Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Are you really that dumb..
I was talking about Adumb,Swines & co on here starting threads & laughing at a fringe RL player working a 2nd job.

& your highlighted part does not state anything like what you claim.
I repeat..SHOW me where I claimed that AFL players will have NOTHING when they retire..

There is a difference between a direct claim (which you are denying) and an insinuation (which I am claiming you did).

Once we establish that difference the situation will be clear as glass. You insinuated through the underlined comment that the NRL situation being laughed at is better than the AFL's full time no need for a second job arrangement. That is what you were called on - putting the NRL situation ahead of the AFL's. Which means you insinuated in effect that AFL players will have nothing when they retire. That's why my first comment in reply was "The NRL should follow the AFL's lead" (quoted verbatim).

Do I have to show you a flow chart to demonstrate this? Are you truly that unintelligent?

Cracker wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Are you really that dumb..
I was talking about Adumb,Swines & co on here starting threads & laughing at a fringe RL player working a 2nd job.

& your highlighted part does not state anything like what you claim.
I repeat..SHOW me where I claimed that AFL players will have NOTHING when they retire..

There is a difference between a direct claim (which you are denying) and an insinuation (which I am claiming you did).

Once we establish that difference the situation will be clear as glass. You insinuated through the underlined comment that the NRL situation being laughed at is better than the AFL's full time no need for a second job arrangement. That is what you were called on - putting the NRL situation ahead of the AFL's. Which means you insinuated in effect that AFL players will have nothing when they retire. That's why my first comment in reply was "The NRL should follow the AFL's lead" (quoted verbatim).

Do I have to show you a flow chart to demonstrate this? Are you truly that unintelligent?

Here's his comment:

Young players who are not yet in 1st grade or on the fringe(as is the case with the player in the media),are encouraged by the NRL to learn a trade ,or have ajob to go to if they don't make the grade or when life in footy is over or if an injury ends their sporting career.
Yet you fumbleidiots laugh at someone who is covering all bases.

You're completely incorrect. He never said ANYTHING about the AFL, their structure, their players, their policies and procedures, anything. He only referenced the AFL fans on this site and how they are incorrect to laugh at the NRL encouraging young players to learn other skills outside their sporting profession. He wasn't claiming the NRL were better, he was defending accusations by people on here that they were worse off because they weren't paid as well.

You need to man up and apologise

Read it again, please, and this time recognise that he was taking a crack at the AFL. He was indeed claiming that the NRL were better.

I will not apologise for something I have not done.

Cracker wrote:

Read it again, please, and this time recognise that he was taking a crack at the AFL. He was indeed claiming that the NRL were better.

I will not apologise for something I have not done.

No, he was having a go at AFL fans when he said "you fumbleidiots". He never said anything about the AFLs model or that the NRLs model was superior. Add to that its his comment and he understands what he meant.

But he doesn't understand what he insinuated, and it looks like neither do you. It was a veiled crack at the AFL pay structure.

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

I Can hear AFLCRAPPER back pedaling!

Would you like to show me where I stated that AFL players will have nothing..

I'll wait,but then again you have serious comprehension issues..

You & Cwackhead have a lot in common..
The IQ of a turnip.

Maybe I should challenge him to get into the ring..
That's what the true internet warriors do.
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

I think Crapper is now singing Queen "Bicycle, bicycle, bicycle, I want to ride my bicycle!"

You should have stopped at I THINK..


& just for you,who got caught lying just like Cwackhead.

I think you pair are insular braindead derpers.
Who resort to lying because that's the derpball way.

.

Oh oh he's back to liar liar again!!! Maybe he didn't take his mood stablizers!!!

Hope my mood never gets that bad that I resort to turning into "INTERNET TOUGH GUY HERO" & start wanting to fight anyone..

WHO needs Mood stabilizers ??

Cracker wrote:

But he doesn't understand what he insinuated, and it looks like neither do you. It was a veiled crack at the AFL pay structure.

Look you simpleton..
I don't make insinuations..
I will say straight out what I think.

You were 100% wrong & cant admit it.
& I know exactly what I meant.
All I did was explain (after the fumbleidiots on here made jokes) why a player would be working a 2nd job..

Your paranoia is clouding what little rational thinking you have.

You made an insinuation whether you meant to or not. Take responsibility for it.

what "insinuation" ??

That NRL players are better off taking on a second job than AFL players who are full time.

Cracker wrote:

That NRL players are better off taking on a second job than AFL players who are full time.

Which he never said or insinuated.

He has already clarified his comments which is far more relevant than your incorrect assertion of his comments. So apologise for accusing him of something he never said or meant

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Insinuation requires an intention, which he stated from the outset he never had. He was defending his own code against people on this forum, not accusing the AFL of anything. Therefore you misinterpreted his intention and should admit it and apologise.

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

.

You are deluded ,stupid & have some some strange superiority complex,where you think you know what other posters "REALLY MEAN" when they post something..You see things that are not there ,& then argue about them ...

You are strange ,very strange..
& that is no fucking insinuation ..
YOU ARE WEIRD.

I read an article the other dat that stated that the AFL ranked 13th in the world for highest paying leagues. This was an average per player playing ... So high paying leagues such as in baseball in States had guys on big pay cheques but at the other end was not so high ... Something like that.