Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Barely surviving...

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
ah geez you fumblers let your rampant jealousy get in the way..

It hurts you mob that we can play internationals.
We have OS bids to join the NRL comp..

But carry on with your delusions they are very amusing

liar liar, you lied. all these lies.
oh yeah really like who?
over half of the players in the RLWC are Australian who once holidayed in a country which gives them the right to represent an international team. & still Australia dominated
real international game

adamj1300 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Barely surviving...

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
ah geez you fumblers let your rampant jealousy get in the way..

It hurts you mob that we can play internationals.
We have OS bids to join the NRL comp..

But carry on with your delusions they are very amusing

liar liar, you lied. all these lies.
oh yeah really like who?
over half of the players in the RLWC are Australian who once holidayed in a country which gives them the right to represent an international team. & still Australia dominated
real international game

Yes it is ..
Hows the All Victardian 4 n 20 Sausage rollers going? :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

They got a heavy rep season this yr? :_<> :_<> :_<>

I hear they are undefeated , :_<> :_<>
NO team stands under a Pie banner like they can.

Your jealousy is quite entertaining..
Please go on..

It seems OS is the answer to the zero interest in SA .

Keep South Australia you dopey flog, we'll place either PNG or NZ into one of our Leagues and either will have SA population covered, when we do ........ oops, already got 3 different teams playing in our competitions. Hahahahahahaha.

Rugby League, the biggest game in all of Australasia.

Sa is not a problem just jettison it eh para

It's a dying city full of old people.

Swans4ever wrote:

So what AFL has played games in NZ, London, Sth Africa, Canada, USA and Japan but we don't claim it as an international comp - those games are nothing more than exhibition matches for points there is NO National RL!!!!

Excuse me, but until last year the AFL never played any matches for premiership points outside of Australia. So such an effort is not relevant. And yet in Great Britain there is a club competition that is nearly the equal of the NRL.

So let's go back to what constitutes "national" and then accept that NRL has home bases in three states and one territory and the AFL has home bases in five states and no territories. This is close enough to equal. Going further is arguing semantics. They are either both national, or neither is national.

Cracker wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

So what AFL has played games in NZ, London, Sth Africa, Canada, USA and Japan but we don't claim it as an international comp - those games are nothing more than exhibition matches for points there is NO National RL!!!!

Excuse me, but until last year the AFL never played any matches for premiership points outside of Australia. So such an effort is not relevant. And yet in Great Britain there is a club competition that is nearly the equal of the NRL.

So let's go back to what constitutes "national" and then accept that NRL has home bases in three states and one territory and the AFL has home bases in five states and no territories. This is close enough to equal. Going further is arguing semantics. They are either both national, or neither is national.

No cracker I won't agree with that assessment teams playing a home match in a territory like NT/Act or another state is not the same as their home ground - it is an exhibition match in reality - but per capita AFL has got every populous state covered on a permenant basis - just saying we play there once or twice a year is not significant enough to say we represent that region - AFL is a National competition - NRL is an eastern seaboard competition denying that is denying the existence of the sun!!!

Swans4ever wrote:

So what AFL has played games in NZ, London, Sth Africa, Canada, USA and Japan but we don't claim it as an international comp - those games are nothing more than exhibition matches for points there is NO National RL!!!!

So much stupid in One post..
I love how the fact that AFL has an international profile on a par with Cheese rolling really eats at you simpletons..
It gets you so bad you resort to lying..

Exhibit #1.
The ONLY GAME that has been played for points outside AUS was the game in NZ last yr..(& by the looks of this yrs non sales it will be a dead duck soon)...Cos will be on Suicide watch..

Exhibit #2,
An international comp has to have some competition for the home country to play..so you cant claim an exhibition game as INTERNATIONAL.Poor Cos will be in the fetal position.

And where does it say the host nation has to play - the Olympics are often held in Nations who didn't even compete in a particular sport until the host was awarded the games
http://www.sailing.org/olympics/london2 ... /26396.php

Cracker wrote:

So let's go back to what constitutes "national" and then accept that NRL has home bases in three states and one territory and the AFL has home bases in five states and no territories. This is close enough to equal. Going further is arguing semantics. They are either both national, or neither is national.

The nrl is an east coast league with representation in three states and one territory all on the east coast.- not national.
The AFL has representation in all states, one territory with second tier competitions in all states and mainland territories. - national.

Which Territory again plays AFL?

Swans4ever wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

So what AFL has played games in NZ, London, Sth Africa, Canada, USA and Japan but we don't claim it as an international comp - those games are nothing more than exhibition matches for points there is NO National RL!!!!

Excuse me, but until last year the AFL never played any matches for premiership points outside of Australia. So such an effort is not relevant. And yet in Great Britain there is a club competition that is nearly the equal of the NRL.

So let's go back to what constitutes "national" and then accept that NRL has home bases in three states and one territory and the AFL has home bases in five states and no territories. This is close enough to equal. Going further is arguing semantics. They are either both national, or neither is national.

No cracker I won't agree with that assessment teams playing a home match in a territory like NT/Act or another state is not the same as their home ground - it is an exhibition match in reality - but per capita AFL has got every populous state covered on a permenant basis - just saying we play there once or twice a year is not significant enough to say we represent that region - AFL is a National competition - NRL is an eastern seaboard competition denying that is denying the existence of the sun!!!

So name the AFL teams that are based in Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory.

This is the reality. You have to compare oranges with oranges, not oranges with apples. If you are going to call the NRL an eastern seaboard competition you have to call the AFL a non territorial mainland competition.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Keep South Australia you dopey flog, we'll place either PNG or NZ into one of our Leagues and either will have SA population covered, when we do ........ oops, already got 3 different teams playing in our competitions. Hahahahahahaha.

Rugby League, the biggest game in all of Australasia.

delusional flog

AFLcrap1 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Barely surviving...

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
ah geez you fumblers let your rampant jealousy get in the way..

It hurts you mob that we can play internationals.
We have OS bids to join the NRL comp..

But carry on with your delusions they are very amusing

liar liar, you lied. all these lies.
oh yeah really like who?
over half of the players in the RLWC are Australian who once holidayed in a country which gives them the right to represent an international team. & still Australia dominated
real international game

Yes it is ..
Hows the All Victardian 4 n 20 Sausage rollers going? :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

They got a heavy rep season this yr? :_<> :_<> :_<>

I hear they are undefeated , :_<> :_<>
NO team stands under a Pie banner like they can.

Your jealousy is quite entertaining..
Please go on..

lol RL rep.
what soo such interest. everything else RL no interest
why is that. state vs state gimmick