Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Sad thing is you probably believe that you mob dont lie .
Even after it is posted in front of you .
Even after you make claims that you cant back up..

& you say i need help..
I think the compulsive liars need help more than i do.
Here is an example of a lie .
The suns have bigger home crowd average than the Titans last yr.



Even a simpleton can see that it is .

You ..i dont think have the brains to work it out..

Are you generalising there a bit?

Are you claiming RL supporters on here don't also make claims that are untrue? Would you like me to point some out for you so you can generalise about RL too?

fumblers just display traits that are inherent within their sport
lying & half truths comes naturally to them

they are sad & pathetic much like their sport

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Sad thing is you probably believe that you mob dont lie .
Even after it is posted in front of you .
Even after you make claims that you cant back up..

& you say i need help..
I think the compulsive liars need help more than i do.
Here is an example of a lie .
The suns have bigger home crowd average than the Titans last yr.



Even a simpleton can see that it is .

You ..i dont think have the brains to work it out..

Are you generalising there a bit?

Are you claiming RL supporters on here don't also make claims that are untrue? Would you like me to point some out for you so you can generalise about RL too?

Well show them up if they do.

But i have continually caught out cos,Adumb,Crapper & swines..It seems to be a major problem with Fumble fans ...COMPULSIVE LYING

MarkZZZ wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Nice deflection attempt once again.
Doesnt alter the fact
YOU WERE CAUGHT OUT LYING .

deflecting what spazza, how the titans are stuffed. like the rest of the NRL=decline

Now your making yourself look even more stupid.

You made this statement

adamj1300 wrote:

the suns beat the titans last year for crowds.

That was a lie. Admit it. You can't deny it. It's there for everyone to see. Are you that stupid?

Don't answer. We all know the answer already.

Yes we do. Adamj1300 was referring to total crowd average, and not home average. On total crowd average the Suns did do better than the Titans.

Best not to ignore that fact.

Cracker wrote:

MarkZZZ wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Nice deflection attempt once again.
Doesnt alter the fact
YOU WERE CAUGHT OUT LYING .

deflecting what spazza, how the titans are stuffed. like the rest of the NRL=decline

Now your making yourself look even more stupid.

You made this statement

adamj1300 wrote:

the suns beat the titans last year for crowds.

That was a lie. Admit it. You can't deny it. It's there for everyone to see. Are you that stupid?

Don't answer. We all know the answer already.

Yes we do. Adamj1300 was referring to total crowd average, and not home average. On total crowd average the Suns did do better than the Titans.

Best not to ignore that fact.

We can ignore it because you are an idiot.

On any forum i go on when discussing the popularity of a team V another team ,it is always about home crowds or home state/area ratings.That goes for either side of the debate
You are the ONLY person I have ever seen try to bring up away crowds as a sign of how popular the SUNS are on the GC.

IT is a moronic argument.

& in the context of adumbs post/lie ,we are talking about the GC.


Tell me if the suns play Freemantle in WA ,how does that show how popular the Suns are on the GC

You sir are an idiot.

You are ignoring an important consideration in the future of elite sport, AFLcrap1. In such a small country as Australia, away supporters are essential for survival. This is not a "moronic" argument. It is recognition of the national nature of the AFL and how the NRL should be going in the same direction for the purposes of competition.

Cracker wrote:

You are ignoring an important consideration in the future of elite sport, AFLcrap1. In such a small country as Australia, away supporters are essential for survival. This is not a "moronic" argument. It is recognition of the national nature of the AFL and how the NRL should be going in the same direction for the purposes of competition.

Of course away supporters are important but they vary too greatly to be used as an indication of support for the away team

Cracker wrote:

You are ignoring an important consideration in the future of elite sport, AFLcrap1. In such a small country as Australia, away supporters are essential for survival. This is not a "moronic" argument. It is recognition of the national nature of the AFL and how the NRL should be going in the same direction for the purposes of competition.

& how does that relate to a teams popularity in their home town/area.
Nothing wrong with having fans outside your area,but it does not relate at all to the teams home town popularity.

My potplant is smarter than you.

What Xman said!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

What Xman said!

The dirt in my pot plant is smarter than you.

MarkZZZ wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

What Xman said!

The dirt in my pot plant is smarter than you.

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

You are ignoring an important consideration in the future of elite sport, AFLcrap1. In such a small country as Australia, away supporters are essential for survival. This is not a "moronic" argument. It is recognition of the national nature of the AFL and how the NRL should be going in the same direction for the purposes of competition.

Of course away supporters are important but they vary too greatly to be used as an indication of support for the away team

But that variable is not enough to just ignore it completely. That's bad business.

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

You are ignoring an important consideration in the future of elite sport, AFLcrap1. In such a small country as Australia, away supporters are essential for survival. This is not a "moronic" argument. It is recognition of the national nature of the AFL and how the NRL should be going in the same direction for the purposes of competition.

Of course away supporters are important but they vary too greatly to be used as an indication of support for the away team

But that variable is not enough to just ignore it completely. That's bad business.

Nobody's ignoring away supporters it's just that home attendances are more important in most instances.

Oh dear, are reports of a 9k crowd for the Titans last night true?

RL heartland apparently.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Sad thing is you probably believe that you mob dont lie .
Even after it is posted in front of you .
Even after you make claims that you cant back up..

& you say i need help..
I think the compulsive liars need help more than i do.
Here is an example of a lie .
The suns have bigger home crowd average than the Titans last yr.



Even a simpleton can see that it is .

You ..i dont think have the brains to work it out..

Are you generalising there a bit?

Are you claiming RL supporters on here don't also make claims that are untrue? Would you like me to point some out for you so you can generalise about RL too?

Well show them up if they do.

But i have continually caught out cos,Adumb,Crapper & swines..It seems to be a major problem with Fumble fans ...COMPULSIVE LYING

You have not caught me out, I don't need to accuse people of lying to make my argument seem stronger!