Page 5 of 9

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 5:15 pm
by Cracker
I would expect this from a person who does not know how to be polite when required to.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 5:50 pm
by King-Eliagh
Cracker wrote:
I would expect this from a person who does not know how to be polite when required to.
I would expect someone who realises their mistake not to respond to questioning.

And please, point to where I lied?

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 6:46 pm
by cos789
King-Eliagh wrote:
And please, point to where I lied?
there there there
there there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there there there
there there there there there
there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there
there there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there
there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there there there
there there there there there
there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there there there there there there
there there there

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:26 pm
by Cracker
King-Eliagh wrote:
Cracker wrote:
I would expect this from a person who does not know how to be polite when required to.
I would expect someone who realises their mistake not to respond to questioning.

And please, point to where I lied?
That's better. Now I'll respond to your question and point to your constantly changing story about your experience in central Australia. That is a lie. Your claimed poor memory is very convenient - or you are in the early stages of Alzheimer's (which I doubt very seriously). Either that or your experience wasn't important enough to remember. There are too many unanswered questions relating to that entire story which is why at present I believe that you lied about it.

That's the one that I am aware of. If anyone can add any please do. And be specific unlike Cos789.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:47 pm
by King-Eliagh
Jesus, looks like I've made quite the impression on our resident nutter from the west cos lettuce. :lol:

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 10:53 pm
by Swans4ever
King-Eliagh wrote:
Jesus, looks like I've made quite the impression on our resident nutter from the west cos lettuce. :lol:
Why is it every one with a different opinion to you is regarded as a nutter? KE opinions are noses everyone's got one and they all smell! (Polite version otherwise RD will read some weird sexual insinuation into it!)

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:00 pm
by King-Eliagh
"Opinions are noses"! Swines you really say the darnedest things :lol:

Even funnier is the fact that I was referring to cos lettuces dumb post which was actually not in the form of an opinion :lol:

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:04 pm
by cos789
Cracker wrote:
And be specific unlike Cos789.
Specifics ? Every time KE opens his mouth

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:07 pm
by King-Eliagh
Comon cos you're gettin lazy man. At least contribute man.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:12 pm
by cos789
King-Eliagh wrote:
Jesus, looks like I've made quite the impression
Yes, I realised you were full of crap a long time ago.

This is supposed to be a fight club not a full of crap club.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:15 pm
by King-Eliagh
Cracker wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Cracker wrote:
I would expect this from a person who does not know how to be polite when required to.
I would expect someone who realises their mistake not to respond to questioning.

And please, point to where I lied?
That's better. Now I'll respond to your question and point to your constantly changing story about your experience in central Australia. That is a lie. Your claimed poor memory is very convenient - or you are in the early stages of Alzheimer's (which I doubt very seriously). Either that or your experience wasn't important enough to remember. There are too many unanswered questions relating to that entire story which is why at present I believe that you lied about it.

That's the one that I am aware of. If anyone can add any please do. And be specific unlike Cos789.
^^^ dipshit

Constantly changing story? That's factually wrong, you've just made that shit up ;)

And I apologise but I don't have a photographic memory of the many and varied places I've travelled. And you, my dipshit, clearly don't understand how memory works in the brain of a human.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:17 pm
by King-Eliagh
cos789 wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Jesus, looks like I've made quite the impression
Yes, I realised you were full of crap a long time ago.

This is supposed to be a fight club not a full of crap club.

You're just jealous.

Chin up matey, I'm sure you've achieved some things in life. Share them with us :)

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:06 am
by AFLcrap1
cos789 wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Jesus, looks like I've made quite the impression
Yes, I realised you were full of crap a long time ago.

This is supposed to be a fight club not a full of crap club.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Yet you post outright lies.

:(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/
AFL France .
You claimed 700 players.
The bloke running it said 200..
As with nearly all Inter :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> national Or lack of, AFL ,zealots like you resort to lying

Who is full of crap now?

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:34 am
by King-Eliagh
Yes the contradiction is interesting isn't it AFLcrap. I've not lied about my previous experiences once on this site. Yet the folk who seem to scream liar the loudest have been the ones who've been caught out lying like there's no tmw.

Personally I think its got to do with an inferiority complex. I mean cos lettuce for example. Harks on about how he has a friend over in france who knows about how AFL has been going over in europe. Then I come in and talk about how ive played in the netherlands against paris and that the game's quite small but full of expats. It must be quite intimidating for some of these guys to hear from someone with real lived experience.

I cant help it though. Its not my fault. :lol:

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:49 am
by Swans4ever
King-Eliagh wrote:
Yes the contradiction is interesting isn't it AFLcrap. I've not lied about my previous experiences once on this site. Yet the folk who seem to scream liar the loudest have been the ones who've been caught out lying like there's no tmw.

Personally I think its got to do with an inferiority complex. I mean cos lettuce for example. Harks on about how he has a friend over in france who knows about how AFL has been going over in europe. Then I come in and talk about how ive played in the netherlands against paris and that the game's quite small but full of expats. It must be quite intimidating for some of these guys to hear from someone with real lived experience.

I cant help it though. Its not my fault. :lol:
Well when did you play there? Can't be in the last 12 months - so how would you know it's still the same. Things don't stand still for the convenience of your argument since 2011 when France attended the IC things may have gone ahead - yet you tell us based on your personal experience it isn't - that's my point you never qualify your statements you just make a claim and expect us to accept it! That's why we think your full of BS because people can check your claims and you know this!