Page 5 of 6
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:28 am
by Swans4ever
Xman wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Would save a shitload of time if any claim on here had a credible source.
I would guess that it wont happen ,as the majority of TLPG,Cwapper & ADAMS CLAIMS would disappear.
Ok, why don't we put it to a vote?
I can create a thread with a poll. People who want to head down this path can give their vote. If enough people agree I'll run it past beaussie.
I'll ask for another mod to help though. I can't trawl every single thread looking for claims to be deleted.
I'll vote yes
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:41 am
by Cracker
I'll vote no because it vetoes opinion and personal experience. Both TLPG and King Eliagh have claimed personal experience that is next to impossible to source. All one can do is look for consistency in the story told and on that TLPG has shown a distinct advantage in the instance to which I refer.
I am sure there will be other examples from both codes.
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:29 am
by AFLcrap1
adamj1300 wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Would save a shitload of time if any claim on here had a credible source.
I would guess that it wont happen ,as the majority of TLPG,Cwapper & ADAMS CLAIMS would disappear.
how about your self always crying fowl when some one out does you in some pointless issue you start?
or how about RD who has never backed up a claim, with any evidence what so ever
like a true braindead NRL fan sit there on their high horse beating chest about your abortion of a game, but throw a few facts about your your claims, you are off changing topics

Ok ****** (seems the word can be used again),show me where I have started a thread ,with no source to back up my claim..
I can show plenty from Fumblers ,Like you.(remember your classic RD username thread,or your RL players are far worse behaved than any other sportsman..i slaughtered you on the First page)
AS for RD ,he has already agreed.
If he posts something that is BS then fine delete it..ban him for a week ,I don't care ...but I think we will be less a few more fumble posters than RL posters.
& I didn't cry to the mods.
I have asked as it has been said on here many times ,Threads just degenerate into Liar ,liar liar.
how can you have anything resembling a debate when posters can post any lie they want & after that ,the thread is fucked .
Me thinks you wont like the idea ...
I am all for it.
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:37 pm
by NRLCrap1
I'll vote yes because it won't affect opinion and as far as facts go we on this side have a far better record for providing sources than the NRL crowd!
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:41 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:I'll vote yes because it won't affect opinion and as far as facts go we on this side have a far better record for providing sources than the NRL crowd!
There we have it folks .
The Village idiot .
Never posts a source except WIKI.
Yet when I post a source ,he claims ..that's bad reporting

Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:06 pm
by NRLCrap1
Souerces within Wikipedia, goose!!
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:20 pm
by King-Eliagh
Swans4ever wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:A very abstract way of "venturing advice" there cwacker. I'd suggest you provide advice more clearly from now on. In any case the thread caN get back on topic.
How many wins this year for GWS?
My prediction. 2
Don't agree my feeling is between 4-6 games, Mumford, Josh Hunt, Shaw, Jed Lamb, Dillion Addison Boyd are all big inclusions with a lot of there list approaching 50 games the improvement should there - I think a more competitive year with less blow outs!
One would hope...I'm not so sure though.
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:31 pm
by King-Eliagh
Cracker wrote:I'll vote no because it vetoes opinion and personal experience. Both TLPG and King Eliagh have claimed personal experience that is next to impossible to source. All one can do is look for consistency in the story told and on that TLPG has shown a distinct advantage in the instance to which I refer.
I am sure there will be other examples from both codes.
Beaussie has already backed up my claims of living and playing in Mparntwe dipshit. Why would he make this up? I'm sorry for the name calling but anyone who sides with LG on this one is, quite simply, a dipshit.
People did the same about me playing in Amsterdam and came on all tough like saying rubbish like "oh yeah well what are the colours of the team". I recalled what I remembered from my one game and got half the colours right instead of bothering to trawl the net for the correct answer, which btw cwacker anyone could do if they were lying. They all jumped to high hell thinking they had finally 'got me', just like LG has embarrassingly done in the other thread which I'll address in a min.
It's quite amusing to watch and anyone who feels the naysayers have an advantage shall be termed dipshits from now on.
Back on topic I think we should have a moderator who can show consistency in ruling and some leadership. Xman's lack of action, consistency and foresight has clearly affected the site. The whole sharing of ip address and LG's posting of it was a complete and utter disgrace. But it is good to see him trying here, albeit without much conviction. The poor bugger is clearly struggling and has exasperatedly called for help on several occasions. He could prob do with a few months rest from the job so he could return with a clear vision of how he wants to, and should, do his job.
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:37 pm
by Cracker
I think you need to present yourself better and more credibly. I am not siding with anyone at this point because I am new and I am still feeling my way around the characters on this forum. First impressions count for a lot, and you have a made a very poor impression. TLPG has made a reasonable one, although his credibility will be lowered if it is proved that he is wrong about the Storm's free to air presentations on GEM.
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:00 pm
by King-Eliagh
Oh common now, while you've tried to be objective you've also been giving ol LG some undue credit my dear cwacker. And don't come at me with the old lollypop excuse "you've been rude" rubbish. This is the fight club.
In future I urge you to think before you suggest TLPG is correct in any argument he has with me. You see, there's quite some history between me and ol LG. He's extremely bitter for the part I played in having his mod status taken away from him. When given power, he was, quite simply, a dictator in the mould of Pinochet. I saved these forums by leading a rebellion against him

. Since then he's been eager to bring me down through whatever means he can. He lies, and lies and lies. He has signed up alternative accounts and tried to have me banned on his new found imaginary friend's religious beliefs!

Remember that one LG??

And he tries to make others, like you dear cwacker, believe things that simply aren't true. This is why I urged beaussie to, somewhat against his will, confess to his knowledge that I've played the game in various locales around Australia.
The fact I play marngrook must really sting our AFL supporters on this site. But...what can I say. Its the truth, and im quite good at it

. The NRL supporters could be extremely disturbed by my playing the sport they despise. At times I've actually argued for the skill that is required to play it. But to their eternal credit, not one of them have had a problem with it, proving once more the superior character of the NRL supporters to the AFL supporters on this site.
Yours Sincerely,
KE - The bringer of truth and justice on TF since '04

Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:03 pm
by Raiderdave
Cracker wrote:. First impressions count for a lot, and you have a made a very poor impression. TLPG has made a reasonable one.
well heres mine of you
based on the above

>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:06 pm
by King-Eliagh
Raiderdave wrote:Cracker wrote:. First impressions count for a lot, and you have a made a very poor impression. TLPG has made a reasonable one.
well heres mine of you
based on the above

>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

There's only a small window of opportunity left for ya cwacker. I'd take heed of my words or forever be seen and proven as .... dipshit

Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:22 pm
by Cracker
See you think I'll listen to you with a snap of your fingers. I'm not a child so don't treat me like one. You accuse TLPG of being a dictator and yet here you are behaving like one towards me. If you are trying to gain my respect you are doing a very poor job of it. TLPG is far better at it, and you will have to provide something more substantial than just your word to prove your statements. A good start would be to refer me to links that show TLPG behaving in the manner you describe from the period you claim.
It also does you no credit to state "I urged beaussie to, somewhat against his will, confess to his knowledge that I've played the game in various locales around Australia" - a statement that appears to indicate that you bullied him into saying it. Now I don't know if you actually did or didn't, but again (and this is something I have said to you before) it presents a poor impression and is open to attack.
I know perfectly well that this is a Fight Club. My pointing out of your rudeness was not a call for you to stop, but rather a reminder of what can happen when you are - especially to someone who is new like myself.
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:34 pm
by TLPG
Cracker, KE just told a pack of lies and here are the highlights.
1. My mod status was NOT taken away from me. I voluntarily gave it up. Look at this from the owner of this website;
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4304&p=90041#p90041
2. I have ONE account on this forum and one ONLY! It's up to KE to prove otherwise and all he can say (without back up from the owner of this website) that the owner told him so! That stupidity is the reason why I have reported the post in question by the way.
3. It's all very well to state that one has played the game (you haven't played "marngrook", KE, you've played "Australian football" - they are not the same thing) but every time aspects of it are mentioned KE demonstrates that he doesn't understand the game! Just because one can kick and handpass and maybe kick a goal or two doesn't make one an expert! And at a low level as well - Sydney lower grades and if we believe KE the Netherlands at the local level. I seriously doubt he played in the Central Australian FL. He might have played socially there (plenty of chances to do so in the communities) but he wouldn't have made the reserves of any of the town clubs in Alice Springs!
Cracker, you are a good judge of character and your call outs on KE's errors in consistency are spot on. You're right - he leaves himself wide open for this stuff and even though I stated I woud not be a particpant on this section of the forum, it's hard to resist factual corrections of his nonsense if I see it when I'm not logged in.
Your calling KE an "arrogant politician" is accurate and then some. He was accused of being on a power trip, and this is proof of it. He fears my genuine knowledge of the game, garnered from over 20 years as an umpire and over 40 years as a spectator in way too many different places to count and at different levels. I doubt anyone can boast the variety of football I've seen in so many different locations.
Re: Giant Farce
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 7:38 am
by Cracker
You confess to "boasting", TLPG, and that doesn't help your credibility. Laying that aside however, umpiring gives a different perspective on the game to playing so stating that you have genuine knowledge of the game in some ways can be rather empty. What I mean is, it's like comparing apples and oranges as the old saying goes.
But you did give proof, unlike King-Eliagh, of the truth of the moderator story. It is now up to him to provide a contradicting link. If he can't or won't then you have the advantage there. You are also correct that it's up to King Eliagh to prove that you have had multiple accounts. I do know that you are correct about the strength of the CAFL even in the reserves having seen it for myself.