Talking Footy

THERE IS NO SUCH LIMITATION, GOOSE!!!!

This thread is about the whole sport. Get used to it, and stop trying to move the goal posts and ignore soccer's superior position. GWS means ZERO to the health of AFL in New South Wales because it's in development. Look to the Swans for a true guide. More importantly look to local numbers and you yourself admitted that!

Why don't you have the ability to qualify your argument dear cwapper.

Ok lesson time.

If you say something like ''numbers mean everything'' and then leave it at that you sound dumb. You need to tell us why, to qualify why this is the case in your post. Unfortunately for you in this argument there is no evidence supporting your claim that numbers in the juniors equates to a threat to professional sporting orgs. Otherwise netball and soccer would've taken over the nrl and AFL yonkers ago.

Now qualify your cwappy argument or piss orrf outta tha thread so intelligent debate and fighting may continue.

Thanks.

Argumentation Lesson © of King-Eliagh inc.

You're only saying all of that because deep down you know I'm right. So you try to argue from another angle to make yourself look clever. Massive fail, goose, massive fail.

Argumentation Lesson (c) of NRLCrap (not inc because that's only for a genuine business)

NRLCrap1 wrote:

You're only saying all of that because deep down you know I'm right. So you try to argue from another angle to make yourself look clever. Massive fail, goose, massive fail.

Argumentation Lesson (c) of NRLCrap (not inc because that's only for a genuine business)

this is bad all the way down to the failed copyright symbol

its © not (c)

King-Eliagh wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

You're only saying all of that because deep down you know I'm right. So you try to argue from another angle to make yourself look clever. Massive fail, goose, massive fail.

Argumentation Lesson (c) of NRLCrap (not inc because that's only for a genuine business)

this is bad all the way down to the failed copyright symbol

its © not (c)

So sue me, goose! On my computer usually when I put (c) it converts it automatically.

Aside from that, again - that's all you've got?

Yes that's all I got. What else can I say but your post is bad?

Actually no I take that back I got more...

It's also amusing I guess. Dumb. Not sensible. It's a lil disturbing. Spam like. Simple. Short. Illegitimate. Invalid. Quite boring at times. It's off topic still... and childlike self absorbed trollop.

I think that sums it up better

King-Eliagh wrote:

Yes I agree, soccer is no threat to RL. The NRL is just far too dominant.

Oh really? Perhaps you could explain why Parramatta Stadium is regularly sold out of Wanderers games but not Eels games and redevelopment of the stadium is due to the Wanderers not the Eels' demands?

Soccer >>> Rugby League in western Sydney.

RL heartland

Which backs up my so called "bad post" that Eliagh can't do anything else with by his own admission!

Beaussie wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Yes I agree, soccer is no threat to RL. The NRL is just far too dominant.

Oh really? Perhaps you could explain why Parramatta Stadium is regularly sold out of Wanderers games but not Eels games and redevelopment of the stadium is due to the Wanderers not the Eels' demands?

Soccer >>> Rugby League in western Sydney.

RL heartland

Only one soccer team in west Sydney and two in the whole city. It's simple marketing principles here beaussie. A whole city has only 2 teams for which to follow their chosen sport. If NRL teams all amalgamated to two Sydney sides you'd see 60k+ at each, each weekend

Oh you wish, Eliagh! How many fans would be lost with such a massive merger?

It's hypothetical dear cwapper but prob lots of fans would be lost but it aint gunna happen now is it. The league is too strong :D

Then why even waste our time with such a comment?

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Then why even waste our time with such a comment?

Oh Sweet jesus
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Then why even waste our time with such a comment?

Oh Sweet jesus
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

On top of the incredible irony, he don't understand the reason for using a hypothetical. It's double bad! :_<>