Talking Footy

Titans still had a higher crowd avg than suns last year, goes to show what a wankfest these memberships are for AFL.....

Phelpsy wrote:

Wow Adam I never cease to be amazed that people think Dave cares about what is true or not

nawwwwwww
tissue twat ?

pHyR3 wrote:

Titans still had a higher crowd avg than suns last year, goes to show what a wankfest these memberships are for AFL.....

sssssshhhhh
that's not the truth according to fumblers as it doesn't have fumblebumbleball in front .... so it can't be right ...it just can't be
K buddy !!

pHyR3 wrote:

Titans still had a higher crowd avg than suns last year, goes to show what a wankfest these memberships are for AFL.....

Memberships don't correlate exactly with crowds because people who aren't members are allowed to attend.....

Phelpsy wrote:

Wow Adam I never cease to be amazed that people think Dave cares about what is true or not

Wow Phelpsy I never cease to be amazed that people think Adam,crapper ,or Cos cares about what is true or not

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Titans still had a higher crowd avg than suns last year, goes to show what a wankfest these memberships are for AFL.....

Memberships don't correlate exactly with crowds because people who aren't members are allowed to attend.....

Memberships don't correlate exactly with crowds because Pets who aren't members are allowed to attend.....

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Titans still had a higher crowd avg than suns last year, goes to show what a wankfest these memberships are for AFL.....

Memberships don't correlate exactly with crowds because people who aren't members are allowed to attend.....

Memberships don't correlate exactly with crowds because Pets who aren't members are allowed to attend.....

Yet memberships are an indication of support,and generally follow crowds. The AFL has over double the members the NRL does, and over double the crowds too.

pHyR3 wrote:

Titans still had a higher crowd avg than suns last year, goes to show what a wankfest these memberships are for AFL.....

But who's getting the all important money out of it, Fyiar?? Here's a clue. It AIN'T the Titans!!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Titans still had a higher crowd avg than suns last year, goes to show what a wankfest these memberships are for AFL.....

But who's getting the all important money out of it, Fyiar?? Here's a clue. It AIN'T the Titans!!

Errrr, who the fuck gets it then?

The SUNS!!! Look at the membership numbers, goose!!!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

The SUNS!!! Look at the membership numbers, goose!!!

& the monies for attendance on match day .. which are more expensive for patrons then memberships goes to whom dickhead ?


14K to a Titans match with 5K members ....
13K to a Thuns match with 10K members

who gets more coin per game twat ?
the Titans .. that's who
another Victory to RL

Wrong. The memberships overhaul the difference, so the Suns win the overall "coin" battle. The Titans would have to be at least 3K ahead on crowds to make up the 5K difference in memberships.

Victory to AFL in the real world.

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

The SUNS!!! Look at the membership numbers, goose!!!

& the monies for attendance on match day .. which are more expensive for patrons then memberships goes to whom dickhead ?


14K to a Titans match with 5K members ....
13K to a Thuns match with 10K members

who gets more coin per game twat ?
the Titans .. that's who
another Victory to RL

The suns because they have a far better stadium deal

That as well!

A three game membership to suns costs about the same as entry to three games. Also, for the longer membershiPS many don't go ti every game