Re: Article from the roar
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:12 pm
Prime time psy3
You should have expanded to Perth long ago and what about Adelaide? And there should have been a second team in Brisbane long ago as well. How long has the AFL had two teams in Adelaide and Perth??pHyR3 wrote:Expanding in what, viewers, money or area covered? Because youre wrong on all fronts. Seem to recall more people watching the NRL GF in melbourne than AFL GF in sydney, neither cities had teams in the other GF and that's DESPITE sydney having an extra 0.7 million people.NRLCrap1 wrote:It's not expanding, Phy! That's how!
Next would obviously be New Zealand, we set up a team there and we are playing NRL nines early next year. Cool 2 million prize money, and also the RLWC which will help expand the game primarily in England but also other nations.
And we will expand to Perth and/or consolidate QLD.
Maybe if you read the whole thing instead of snipping like you did.......oh of course you don't want to face the truth do you? You are only interesting in snippets that you can twist.Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:We expanded into SA and WA with the national competition. That's what I was talking about, demented Dave! Oh and the Swans and the Bears/Lions! The Suns and the Giants are bonus material capitalising on that initial expansion! And what has the NRL done? Brisbane and Canberra, then Melbourne and NZ? Where are Adelaide and Perth huh?Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:It's not expanding, Phy! That's how!
yes
we should all be rushing to pop teams in of the calibre of oxygen thieve clubs like the Thuns & MIdgets![]()
& there
we have our cheese grater back![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
seriously how could you type that without pissing yr pants laughing![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
maybe you did![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
adamj1300 wrote:getting desprite againRaiderdave wrote:wankity wank wank wankPhelpsy wrote:http://m.titans.com.au/news-display/Tit ... tips/83075
Just to show how two codes get on well and it's just the backward hicks that see AFL as the enemy![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the VFL started the code wars & continue to fuel them by constantly send out stories like this one
http://www.foxsports.com.au/AFL/AFL-pre ... 6083220833
this was written at fumbles & bumbles HQ & handed to news ltd to post as one of their stories on foxsports as part of the contra arrangement in the media rights deal
post it .... now !!
said the fat fuck who runs VFL
its a battle according to them
the constant stirring & chest beating of the VFL & its clubs is sickening ... they take every opportunity to lay in the boot
& when we whop them like the Titans have the Thuns since 2011
its all
oh... lets be friends![]()
only a cockhead would believe this wolf in sheeps clothing shit from the VFL
& I present to you ... Phelpsy![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I mean this twat was shooting his load over a school being bribed to pull up RL posts & place feebleball ones in ... so as to deny kids access to an oval to play RL
he was cheerin
& then he wonders why there is hostility toward this bumbling Victorian abortion up this way![]()
how dumb are this lot![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
how dumb
Phelpsy wrote:Gold Coast is evening up psy3
Raiderdave wrote:Phelpsy wrote:Gold Coast is evening up psy3![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
delusion much![]()
![]()
![]()
pHyR3.....the point is we continually hear RL supporters tell us that RL is the national code yet in 3 states there is no representation, there is one team in Victoria - now you can't call yourself national when it's only two states involved - it makes a mockery of international competition - the same applies for the WC when 120 players are representing countries - now Australia didn't take 60 players to the WC - many of the players representing other countries have never been to those countries and are there because their parents did - it's not a true international comp it's an expanded SOO - if AF did the same no AFL fan would see that as international growth in their sport just shuffling deck chairs to make it have the appearance of something it's not. If they had strict entry for sides it may be really only 5 countries Australia, NZ, England, France and PNG - I would have far more interest in that than some manipulated WC. That's always been my point.pHyR3 wrote:Why should we have expanded to Perth and Adelaide? NRL is not popular there, it is popular in NSW, QLD, ACT, the islands and NZ. And Victoria has a big enough population to have an expansion.
Alright mate, i can't use the GF as comparison....I assume that's because any stat that support NRL growth is invalid and then you AFL supporters will immediately resort back to crowds.
No they are NOT! that's only in countries like Italy and the USA. England has NO aussie, neither does NZ, I doubt Fiji has many, same with most islands like PNG, Samoa and Tonga. Maybe a couple, but how does that invalidate the expansion of international league? Oh right, cause again NRL expansion is impossible in your eyes and you will just ignore anything that says otherwise.
Swans4ever wrote:pHyR3.....the point is we continually hear RL supporters tell us that RL is the national code .pHyR3 wrote:Why should we have expanded to Perth and Adelaide? NRL is not popular there, it is popular in NSW, QLD, ACT, the islands and NZ. And Victoria has a big enough population to have an expansion.
Alright mate, i can't use the GF as comparison....I assume that's because any stat that support NRL growth is invalid and then you AFL supporters will immediately resort back to crowds.
No they are NOT! that's only in countries like Italy and the USA. England has NO aussie, neither does NZ, I doubt Fiji has many, same with most islands like PNG, Samoa and Tonga. Maybe a couple, but how does that invalidate the expansion of international league? Oh right, cause again NRL expansion is impossible in your eyes and you will just ignore anything that says otherwise.
I haven't got time to look up your previous posts but you have said it many times - or do you regard NSW as Australia and all other states as it's colony?Raiderdave wrote:Swans4ever wrote:pHyR3.....the point is we continually hear RL supporters tell us that RL is the national code .pHyR3 wrote:Why should we have expanded to Perth and Adelaide? NRL is not popular there, it is popular in NSW, QLD, ACT, the islands and NZ. And Victoria has a big enough population to have an expansion.
Alright mate, i can't use the GF as comparison....I assume that's because any stat that support NRL growth is invalid and then you AFL supporters will immediately resort back to crowds.
No they are NOT! that's only in countries like Italy and the USA. England has NO aussie, neither does NZ, I doubt Fiji has many, same with most islands like PNG, Samoa and Tonga. Maybe a couple, but how does that invalidate the expansion of international league? Oh right, cause again NRL expansion is impossible in your eyes and you will just ignore anything that says otherwise.
who the fuck has ever said that you ********* halfwit>
the only twats who sprout that crap is fumbles & bumbles fans
Australias game
yeah like fuck it is![]()
:_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Do you have an NT team and a tassie team? genuinely curious.NRLCrap1 wrote:Yes it is and you can't stand it. A team in every mainland and games being played in every state and territory.
Australia's Game? Yes AFL is certainly that!
NT is represented in the NEAFL, Tas have state sides in Amos inter league, teal cup, but are next cab off the rank for inclusion in the AFL at next expansion. But not yet in AFL.pHyR3 wrote:Do you have an NT team and a tassie team? genuinely curious.NRLCrap1 wrote:Yes it is and you can't stand it. A team in every mainland and games being played in every state and territory.
Australia's Game? Yes AFL is certainly that!
there are a few games up in NT every year, as for Tasmania, North Melbourne & Hawthorn both play several home games down there every year. The Tasmanian government did try and lobby the AFL a few years ago for a team, but the AFL's decision was that there it wasn't financially viable at the time & low population is vastly spread outpHyR3 wrote:Do you have an NT team and a tassie team? genuinely curious.NRLCrap1 wrote:Yes it is and you can't stand it. A team in every mainland and games being played in every state and territory.
Australia's Game? Yes AFL is certainly that!