Talking Footy

pHyR3 wrote:

shut up swans, how the hell does posting a picture of a child make someone a pedo? you truly must be 14.

How does saying I'm not interested in seeing Australian Islanders playing against New Zealand Islanders in the RL WC make me racist - BUT according to the law if you get pictures of young children from the net with a deviant intent that qualifies as child porn and thus issues of peadophilia! Now RD regularly posts pictures of kids on the next makes regular remarks of a sexual nature and is quick to accuse AFL of harbouring peadophiles so as they say if you live in glass houses!

Excellent ADULT explanation, Swans!

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

shut up swans, how the hell does posting a picture of a child make someone a pedo? you truly must be 14.

How does saying I'm not interested in seeing Australian Islanders playing against New Zealand Islanders in the RL WC make me racist - BUT according to the law if you get pictures of young children from the net with a deviant intent that qualifies as child porn and thus issues of peadophilia! Now RD regularly posts pictures of kids on the next makes regular remarks of a sexual nature and is quick to accuse AFL of harbouring peadophiles so as they say if you live in glass houses!

And this is why i think you're 14. Where did I say you were racist? nice.

Source? so I assume the wiggles could be charged for pedophilia if you could prove 'deviant intent' haha

And regular remarks of a sexual nature ABOUT THE CHILDREN? never saw that, can you link me?

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Ignorance thy name is Dave; again and again and again....

yes you're probably right

the Swines may well get up to ratings on TV that match the Brady bunch in 2014

The SWANS beat the Brady Bunch every time by miles. That's why I called you ignorant, Dave.

:_<> :_<>

sure they did cheese grater

sure :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Don't argue with Dave ... From Canberra he knows all about Sydney ... More so than people who live there lol. And don't ever count pay tv figures into ratings lol.

I hear fox are going to publish state by state ratings next year. Should be interesting. Of course we will wait for the excuses ... Hmmmm it will be all the people on the riverina watching lol.

Phelpsy wrote:

Don't argue with Dave ... From Canberra he knows all about Sydney ... More so than people who live there lol. And don't ever count pay tv figures into ratings lol.

I hear fox are going to publish state by state ratings next year. Should be interesting. Of course we will wait for the excuses ... Hmmmm it will be all the people on the riverina watching lol.

That's right Phelpsy - because no one is interested in AFL north of the Murray - the NEAFL the Sydney AFL leagues, the QAFL etc etc etc - all those people flying up from Melb each weekend from u9's thru to Seniors no wonder all the airlines are offering cheap flights!

pHyR3 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

shut up swans, how the hell does posting a picture of a child make someone a pedo? you truly must be 14.

How does saying I'm not interested in seeing Australian Islanders playing against New Zealand Islanders in the RL WC make me racist - BUT according to the law if you get pictures of young children from the net with a deviant intent that qualifies as child porn and thus issues of peadophilia! Now RD regularly posts pictures of kids on the next makes regular remarks of a sexual nature and is quick to accuse AFL of harbouring peadophiles so as they say if you live in glass houses!

And this is why i think you're 14. Where did I say you were racist? nice.

Source? so I assume the wiggles could be charged for pedophilia if you could prove 'deviant intent' haha

And regular remarks of a sexual nature ABOUT THE CHILDREN? never saw that, can you link me?

He didn't specify you, Phy! He was talking about Dave, and Dave is now in trouble for it as well. Swans is also in trouble for his response, but let me say this. Dave left himself wide open for the remark even if it's not true by constantly posting pictures of little girls. It doesn't prove anything anymore than what Dave thinks Swans meant over "Islanders", which was the whole point of Swans' tactic.

Is this sinking in yet?

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Ignorance thy name is Dave; again and again and again....

yes you're probably right

the Swines may well get up to ratings on TV that match the Brady bunch in 2014

The SWANS beat the Brady Bunch every time by miles. That's why I called you ignorant, Dave.

:_<> :_<>

sure they did cheese grater

sure :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Oh rly? Show me the figures that show the Brady Bunch beat the Swans in TV ratings for a given half hour. Come on then, I'm waiting.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

shut up swans, how the hell does posting a picture of a child make someone a pedo? you truly must be 14.

How does saying I'm not interested in seeing Australian Islanders playing against New Zealand Islanders in the RL WC make me racist - BUT according to the law if you get pictures of young children from the net with a deviant intent that qualifies as child porn and thus issues of peadophilia! Now RD regularly posts pictures of kids on the next makes regular remarks of a sexual nature and is quick to accuse AFL of harbouring peadophiles so as they say if you live in glass houses!

And this is why i think you're 14. Where did I say you were racist? nice.

Source? so I assume the wiggles could be charged for pedophilia if you could prove 'deviant intent' haha

And regular remarks of a sexual nature ABOUT THE CHILDREN? never saw that, can you link me?

He didn't specify you, Phy! He was talking about Dave, and Dave is now in trouble for it as well. Swans is also in trouble for his response, but let me say this. Dave left himself wide open for the remark even if it's not true by constantly posting pictures of little girls. It doesn't prove anything anymore than what Dave thinks Swans meant over "Islanders", which was the whole point of Swans' tactic.

Is this sinking in yet?

He quoted me then in the same paragraph, no, same SENTENCE said something about racism. would seem as though he were adressing me.

pHyR3 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

shut up swans, how the hell does posting a picture of a child make someone a pedo? you truly must be 14.

How does saying I'm not interested in seeing Australian Islanders playing against New Zealand Islanders in the RL WC make me racist - BUT according to the law if you get pictures of young children from the net with a deviant intent that qualifies as child porn and thus issues of peadophilia! Now RD regularly posts pictures of kids on the next makes regular remarks of a sexual nature and is quick to accuse AFL of harbouring peadophiles so as they say if you live in glass houses!

And this is why i think you're 14. Where did I say you were racist? nice.

Source? so I assume the wiggles could be charged for pedophilia if you could prove 'deviant intent' haha

And regular remarks of a sexual nature ABOUT THE CHILDREN? never saw that, can you link me?

He didn't specify you, Phy! He was talking about Dave, and Dave is now in trouble for it as well. Swans is also in trouble for his response, but let me say this. Dave left himself wide open for the remark even if it's not true by constantly posting pictures of little girls. It doesn't prove anything anymore than what Dave thinks Swans meant over "Islanders", which was the whole point of Swans' tactic.

Is this sinking in yet?

He quoted me then in the same paragraph, no, same SENTENCE said something about racism. would seem as though he were adressing me.

I wasn't referring to you I was referring to RD's tactic of calling me a racist, you were responding to something that I'm not sure you knew what started it. Anyway I won't post any more of those slurs if he doesn't!

There you are, Phy. You were being paranoid.

On the topic of 'Buddy' must be a good ploy for this year at least got 5 pages on fight club without raising a sweat!

Swans4ever wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Don't argue with Dave ... From Canberra he knows all about Sydney ... More so than people who live there lol. And don't ever count pay tv figures into ratings lol.

I hear fox are going to publish state by state ratings next year. Should be interesting. Of course we will wait for the excuses ... Hmmmm it will be all the people on the riverina watching lol.

That's right Phelpsy - because no one is interested in AFL north of the Murray - the NEAFL the Sydney AFL leagues, the QAFL etc etc etc - all those people flying up from Melb each weekend from u9's thru to Seniors no wonder all the airlines are offering cheap flights!

RD also told us all about Queensland the other week, how no one is interest in this Victorian abomination of a sport!, that must be why all the clubs are apparently all broke as well as the cheap flights. every on gets flown from Melbourne to all around Queensland & NSW to play amateur matches from juniors all up to the seniors! wow he is such a smart man

Buddy leading the headlines yet again in Sydney. The guy is proving to be massive news in Sydney.

Imagine how much money he is going to put into the Swans/AFL bank accounts.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entert ... 6767424045

Beaussie wrote:

Buddy leading the headlines yet again in Sydney. The guy is proving to be massive news in Sydney.

Imagine how much money he is going to put into the Swans/AFL bank accounts.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entert ... 6767424045

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

yes
huge interest .... maybe if they have a real big year they can finally knock this mob off for popularity



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

the Swines & Barney Frankenfurter
jokes ... side splitting jokes
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>