Talking Footy

They do, but you merkins don't like the regionals added.

@MediaweekAUS: Sat TV #AFLGF Match metro 2,717,000 (Syd 344k Mel 1.279m Bri 243k Ade 348k Per 503k) @HawthornFC @Fremantle_FC

About 220k down on last year. Sydney was down 265k for obvious reasons. Thats the penalty for playing a day grand final, you get far fewer occasional viewers.

2012 SEVEN’S AFL: GRAND FINAL: HAWTHORN V SYDNEY Seven 2,937,000 609,000 1,331,000 295,000 309,000 393,000

Xman wrote:

pHyR3 wrote:

onya raiderdave.

nrl's having a shit year this year, big whoop. Popular teams are doing shit, Wests, Dragons, Broncos, etc. they removed the biff, removed the shoulder charge and reffing has been abysmal. So TV ratings are down and crowds are slightly down. And NRL crowds will always be below AFL cause nrl is better watched at home, AFL at the ground.

But despite all that, 2 million watching a prelim final. NOT BAD.

Why don't the NRL double the AFL in ratings? .

but but

but but but .....

:_<> :_<> :_<>

whopped
& that's ..with... their dodgy pay ratings .... take out about 200K of these that are double counted in pay & fta
& jesus

it aint a contest

Xman wrote:

@MediaweekAUS: Sat TV #AFLGF Match metro 2,717,000 (Syd 344k Mel 1.279m Bri 243k Ade 348k Per 503k) @HawthornFC @Fremantle_FC

About 220k down on last year. Sydney was down 265k for obvious reasons. Thats the penalty for playing a day grand final, you get far fewer occasional viewers.

2012 SEVEN’S AFL: GRAND FINAL: HAWTHORN V SYDNEY Seven 2,937,000 609,000 1,331,000 295,000 309,000 393,000

Xman no Swans no 4m viewers...........................that is the reason your down stop with the excuses....


SOO 123 all beat the AFL grand final........... =D> =D>

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

@MediaweekAUS: Sat TV #AFLGF Match metro 2,717,000 (Syd 344k Mel 1.279m Bri 243k Ade 348k Per 503k) @HawthornFC @Fremantle_FC

About 220k down on last year. Sydney was down 265k for obvious reasons. Thats the penalty for playing a day grand final, you get far fewer occasional viewers.

2012 SEVEN’S AFL: GRAND FINAL: HAWTHORN V SYDNEY Seven 2,937,000 609,000 1,331,000 295,000 309,000 393,000

Xman no Swans no 4m viewers...........................that is the reason your down stop with the excuses....


SOO 123 all beat the AFL grand final........... =D> =D>

Pretty similar to other recent GFs not involving the swans. The NRL will suffer a similare reduction without the storm, as seen in previous years also.

Xman wrote:

@MediaweekAUS: Sat TV #AFLGF Match metro 2,717,000 (Syd 344k Mel 1.279m Bri 243k Ade 348k Per 503k) @HawthornFC @Fremantle_FC

About 220k down on last year. Sydney was down 265k for obvious reasons. Thats the penalty for playing a day grand final, you get far fewer occasional viewers.

2012 SEVEN’S AFL: GRAND FINAL: HAWTHORN V SYDNEY Seven 2,937,000 609,000 1,331,000 295,000 309,000 393,000

so about 750K regionals
seriously no one in Regional NSW or QLD would have given a shit with Free Ho's involvement.........
& we're at 3.475 to 3.5 Million odd ...... down 600K on 2012


currently the VFL GF sits ............. 4th ....well behind all 3 RL's State Of Origins
with SOO II attracting 3.875 Mill holding down the Bronze medal ATM
so
theres no medal for the fumbles n bumbles in 2013


wow fumblers ............. wow :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

I was told your fumbling bumbling & missing ( & there was plenty of that yesterday ) GF

was the biggest game of footy in the land > ... bar none .... every year
hmmmmmm

yet in 2013
its not the

biggest
or
the 2nd biggest

or 3rd

& quite probably after next sunday night

4th biggest either


in my best Pauline Hanson voice

please explain ?


:_<> :_<> :_<>

Xman wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

@MediaweekAUS: Sat TV #AFLGF Match metro 2,717,000 (Syd 344k Mel 1.279m Bri 243k Ade 348k Per 503k) @HawthornFC @Fremantle_FC

About 220k down on last year. Sydney was down 265k for obvious reasons. Thats the penalty for playing a day grand final, you get far fewer occasional viewers.

2012 SEVEN’S AFL: GRAND FINAL: HAWTHORN V SYDNEY Seven 2,937,000 609,000 1,331,000 295,000 309,000 393,000

Xman no Swans no 4m viewers...........................that is the reason your down stop with the excuses....


SOO 123 all beat the AFL grand final........... =D> =D>

Pretty similar to other recent GFs not involving the swans. The NRL will suffer a similare reduction without the storm, as seen in previous years also.

ahhhhhhh

Wests Tigers V Cowboys in 2005 attracted 4.025 Million
if Souths had of qualified for their first GF in 42 years next week theres absolutely no doubt the NRL GF would have cracked 4 Million again

While the VFL needs the SWines to have a 4 as their starting number for GF TV ratings
the NRL does not necessarily need the Storm to achieve this & with a return to a 7pm kickoff ... certainly won't in coming years

See .. Already arguing about how many regional viewers ??? Best to stick to 5 city metro ... At least there is no conjecture.

Phelpsy wrote:

See .. Already arguing about how many regional viewers ??? Best to stick to 5 city metro ... At least there is no conjecture.

theres no conjecture with regionals


ask Ch 9 cock.b.reath :_<> :_<>


how can a sport that claims to be this nations most popular ... not have the biggest game of the year

or the 2nd

or the 3rd

or maybe even the 4th


how fumblers
how >


:_<> :_<> :_<>

Phelpsy wrote:

See .. Already arguing about how many regional viewers ??? Best to stick to 5 city metro ... At least there is no conjecture.

Oh whats that your want a purple medal for coming fourth or maybe you want a grey medal for 5th, ill get them ready for you.............. :_<> :_<> :_<>

eelofwest wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

See .. Already arguing about how many regional viewers ??? Best to stick to 5 city metro ... At least there is no conjecture.

Oh whats that your want a purple medal for coming fourth or maybe you want a grey medal for 5th, ill get them ready for you.............. :_<> :_<> :_<>

:_<> :_<> :_<>

how bout red eel ?....


to reflect the colour of their faces :_<> :_<>

The AFL grand final has to be in prime time next year

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

The AFL grand final has to be in prime time next year

:_<> :_<> :_<>

You have got 4th position atm, it might be 5th spot by next week..........................you might need a night final to compete with SOO.....

Raiderdave wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

See .. Already arguing about how many regional viewers ??? Best to stick to 5 city metro ... At least there is no conjecture.

Oh whats that your want a purple medal for coming fourth or maybe you want a grey medal for 5th, ill get them ready for you.............. :_<> :_<> :_<>

:_<> :_<> :_<>

how bout red eel ?....


to reflect the colour of their faces :_<> :_<>

Yeah red sounds good, how about brown...............................when the NRL takes a dump from a 2 story building and lands on there faces, thus making the brown medal more suitable don't you think?............. :_<> :_<> :_<>

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

The AFL grand final has to be in prime time next year

oh

but de twadition


TWADITION!!


yuz are all about TWADITION !!

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


4th & it may end up being 5th
yep....
that's were a declining sports biggest game ends up :_<> :_<>