Talking Footy

cos789 wrote:

Fremantle Dockers turned over $50 million this year.

wow is that all
the Canberra Raiders PTY LTD turned over ............ over 65 Million all up in 2013

NRLCrap1 wrote:

A balance sheet shows ASSETS! That's not cash money

>

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>



a balance sheet shows both you ********* fuckhead


OMG

you are obviously an ignoramus .. a .. know nothing
read
research
learn

then
you actually might know something about ... something ... anything
then

you can join the debate without embarrassing yourself :_<> :_<>

That's right it does show both, and the Broncos ASSETS show whatever the figure you gave (can't be bothered looking back for it).

And there's no way the Raiders turned over 65 mill! Evidence!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

That's right it does show both, and the Broncos ASSETS show whatever the figure you gave (can't be bothered looking back for it).

:_<> :_<>

tell me
did the article say ........... 15 million in cash

or


15 million in cash & assets ?


& captain .. never gets anything right ...... strikes again


first it was cash isn't shown on balance sheets
then

well ummmm ... yes it is


then its the figure quoted is cash & assets
when


quite clearly it isn't


& then he wants to challenge me on the Raiders turnover

that'd 3/3
totally wrong on everything

the lot >


:_<> :_<> :_<>
I have never seen anyone who can post mistake after inaccuracy after simply incorrect ... time after time after time

like this fuckwit

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

That's right it does show both, and the Broncos ASSETS show whatever the figure you gave (can't be bothered looking back for it).

:_<> :_<>

tell me
did the article say ........... 15 million in cash

or


15 million in cash & assets ?

Cash IS assets!

The Raiders football dept loses money on a $10m budget.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

That's right it does show both, and the Broncos ASSETS show whatever the figure you gave (can't be bothered looking back for it).

:_<> :_<>

tell me
did the article say ........... 15 million in cash

or


15 million in cash & assets ?

Cash IS assets!

:_<> :_<>
assets are reported as your facilities .... your buildings & equipment etc
the ovals you hold leases to or own outright


cash is reported on balance sheets as CASH ....you utter fuckwit
as your bank balance
if you have any that is

like poor ol poort poopsalot

their bank balance is
18,698,458 DEBIT

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Stewie wrote:

The Raiders football dept loses money on a $10m budget.

its actually 15 million this year **********
we got extra dough from the media rights deal ... 3 million & the figure for the raiders was always 12 million .... not 10
and the clubs other interests raked in another 52 Million

& overall we popped a tidy 3.5 Million in the bank

while your fuckhead club lost another ..................... 3.5 million :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

That's right it does show both, and the Broncos ASSETS show whatever the figure you gave (can't be bothered looking back for it).

:_<> :_<>

tell me
did the article say ........... 15 million in cash

or


15 million in cash & assets ?

Cash IS assets!

:_<> :_<>
assets are reported as your facilities .... your buildings & equipment etc
the ovals you hold leases to or own outright


cash is reported on balance sheets as CASH ....you utter fuckwit
as your bank balance
if you have any that is

like poor ol poort poopsalot

their bank balance is
18,698,458 DEBIT

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Total assets on a balance sheet includes cash you brain dead cactus!

The Broncos can't hold that much in the bank. So I don't believe you. The amount you quoted has to be total assets. It can't be anything else.

You show me the balance sheet in detail, or admit that you're lying.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

That's right it does show both, and the Broncos ASSETS show whatever the figure you gave (can't be bothered looking back for it).

:_<> :_<>

tell me
did the article say ........... 15 million in cash

or


15 million in cash & assets ?

Cash IS assets!

:_<> :_<>
assets are reported as your facilities .... your buildings & equipment etc
the ovals you hold leases to or own outright


cash is reported on balance sheets as CASH ....you utter fuckwit
as your bank balance
if you have any that is

like poor ol poort poopsalot

their bank balance is
18,698,458 DEBIT

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Total assets on a balance sheet includes cash you brain dead cactus!

The Broncos can't hold that much in the bank. So I don't believe you. The amount you quoted has to be total assets. It can't be anything else.

You show me the balance sheet in detail, or admit that you're lying.

you are a special ***** aren't you ?

the Broncos financial report half yearly 2013
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130808/p ... j6b05v.pdf

football operation ....
turnover for the half year .. of $19.2 Million
total cash on hand at June 30th this year
$15,190,111

total assets including cash & property $34,213,120
total liabilities $7,184,550

total equity of $26,802,673


now
make a fist with your tiny girly hands ... & proceed to rain uppercut style blows on yr dribble covered chin

K fwit ?

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

The Raiders football dept loses money on a $10m budget.

its actually 15 million this year **********

And not one source will be provided.

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

That's right it does show both, and the Broncos ASSETS show whatever the figure you gave (can't be bothered looking back for it).

:_<> :_<>

tell me
did the article say ........... 15 million in cash

or


15 million in cash & assets ?

Cash IS assets!

:_<> :_<>
assets are reported as your facilities .... your buildings & equipment etc
the ovals you hold leases to or own outright


cash is reported on balance sheets as CASH ....you utter fuckwit
as your bank balance
if you have any that is

like poor ol poort poopsalot

their bank balance is
18,698,458 DEBIT

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Total assets on a balance sheet includes cash you brain dead cactus!

The Broncos can't hold that much in the bank. So I don't believe you. The amount you quoted has to be total assets. It can't be anything else.

You show me the balance sheet in detail, or admit that you're lying.

you are a special ***** aren't you ?

the Broncos financial report half yearly 2013
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130808/p ... j6b05v.pdf

football operation ....
turnover for the half year .. of $19.2 Million
total cash on hand at June 30th this year
$15,190,111

total assets including cash & property $34,213,120
total liabilities $7,184,550

total equity of $26,802,673


now
make a fist with your tiny girly hands ... & proceed to rain uppercut style blows on yr dribble covered chin

K fwit ?

Well, well, well! For the first time in his life, Dave actually provides tangible evidence!! Who would have thunk it?

One problem though. Page 2. Total profit only $2.7 million. Makes the figures you're quoting from page 11 (I think from memory) seem almost fake.

As for the fist, the only fist I would make would be one heading for your glass chin. If I wanted to waste it that way.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

That's right it does show both, and the Broncos ASSETS show whatever the figure you gave (can't be bothered looking back for it).

:_<> :_<>

tell me
did the article say ........... 15 million in cash

or


15 million in cash & assets ?

Cash IS assets!

:_<> :_<>
assets are reported as your facilities .... your buildings & equipment etc
the ovals you hold leases to or own outright


cash is reported on balance sheets as CASH ....you utter fuckwit
as your bank balance
if you have any that is

like poor ol poort poopsalot

their bank balance is
18,698,458 DEBIT

:_<> :_<> :_<>

Total assets on a balance sheet includes cash you brain dead cactus!

The Broncos can't hold that much in the bank. So I don't believe you. The amount you quoted has to be total assets. It can't be anything else.

You show me the balance sheet in detail, or admit that you're lying.

you are a special ***** aren't you ?

the Broncos financial report half yearly 2013
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130808/p ... j6b05v.pdf

football operation ....
turnover for the half year .. of $19.2 Million
total cash on hand at June 30th this year
$15,190,111

total assets including cash & property $34,213,120
total liabilities $7,184,550

total equity of $26,802,673


now
make a fist with your tiny girly hands ... & proceed to rain uppercut style blows on yr dribble covered chin

K fwit ?

Well, well, well! For the first time in his life, Dave actually provides tangible evidence!! Who would have thunk it?

One problem though. Page 2. Total profit only $2.7 million. Makes the figures you're quoting from page 11 (I think from memory) seem almost fake.

As for the fist, the only fist I would make would be one heading for your glass chin. If I wanted to waste it that way.

I post these all the time


fumblers just can't seem to read them through their tears & feet stamping

& what the holy fuck are you talking about dipshit
every thing I have quoted matches these figures ....... to the near cent


& if you attempted to throw some heat at me
you'd be regretting the day yr mumma allowed yr poppa the 16 seconds of fumbling bumbling around her private parts that resulted in the biggest disappointment in their lives

you ......

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

The Raiders football dept loses money on a $10m budget.

its actually 15 million this year **********

And not one source will be provided.

12 million in 2012
&


the NRL grant increasing by 3 million this year equals


oh yeah
I forgot
that'd require some mathematical ability

& neither the fans ......... or the finance personel of your shit stain club have any :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

The Raiders football dept loses money on a $10m budget.

its actually 15 million this year **********

And not one source will be provided.

12 million in 2012
&


the NRL grant increasing by 3 million this year equals


oh yeah
I forgot
that'd require some mathematical ability

& neither the fans ......... or the finance personel of your shit stain club have any :_<> :_<>

The Raiders football team has generated around $12-$13 million of revenue in recent years, making it one of the poorest-performing in the competition. This effectively means the football club is uneconomic and demands several million dollars from the leagues club and property trust for support each year. With no competition for funds in the nation's capital, this should stand the football club in good stead for some years to come.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z2hmE7OAZ5
so just because just because the raiders receive a hand out from the NRL, you claim that the clubs operating revenue has grown >