Talking Footy

Judge J wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Judge J wrote:

Raider Dave I am referring to the 250 instances you claimed, not the 4 that have been verified.

And you will moderate your language when addressing me.

hmmm
maybe you can translate this into English then ?

Judge J wrote:. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

FMD
how dumb

How is my statement "dumb"? It was you who claimed that there were 250 instances of racism in the AFL. You have 246 to go.

247 the goodes v hawthorn one was not racist.

At present I want to see what Raider Dave has to offer. We should leave arguing the details until after that.

Phelpsy wrote:

A narcissist like yourself would love that power ... Your profile is so typical of supposed superiority , desperate to prove it and to have power over to do so. Powers important to you isn't KE ... What other avenue do you to pursue to exert power over people , to feel superior???

Gold Phelpsy!

Yes I am quite powerful aren't I

What else do I do? Ummm I dunno, some weekends I catch neighbourhood cats and microwave em.

I have the RSPCA on speed dial, King Eliagh.

shhhhhh Judy, I'm just playing to Phelpy's incorrect judgement that im a power crazed psychopath. Mums the word though ok.

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Judge J wrote:

That also requires verification, King Eliagh. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

what the F are you talking about you blithering tool

the 4 I have cited
Goodes 2 V Collinsdildo
Goodes I V Whoresareusathorne
Daw V ...... ahhhh another pack of bumbling clowns

all reported
all verified

give youself an uppercut dickhead

Nice try. Goodes V hawthorn? Surely you read don't you? Oh that's right your a troll I forgot for a minute.

you blithering cock
NewsletterRSSShare.288171-tlsnewslandscape


The Swans approached the AFL just two weeks ago after Goodes was abused at the same venue in his side's 37-point loss to Hawthorn in round seven

You really can't read can you. I've never seen so much fail in one thread. It's like I just gave you a hard core slap... Wammm and then you have come back for seconds...
Maybe three times a charm. Maybe you will read it this time. Notice the words "There was no suggestion of racial vilification".



http://www.AFL.com.au/news/2013-05-14/g ... ppropriate

what was he havin a go at his haircut then f wit
he was abused because he was black
maybe no racial terms were used ... on this occasion

but we all know what the motivations for this racist scum was don't we

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Judge J wrote:

That also requires verification, King Eliagh. At present, the number proven lies at 4 and only 4.

what the F are you talking about you blithering tool

the 4 I have cited
Goodes 2 V Collinsdildo
Goodes I V Whoresareusathorne
Daw V ...... ahhhh another pack of bumbling clowns

all reported
all verified

give youself an uppercut dickhead

Nice try. Goodes V hawthorn? Surely you read don't you? Oh that's right your a troll I forgot for a minute.

you blithering cock
NewsletterRSSShare.288171-tlsnewslandscape


The Swans approached the AFL just two weeks ago after Goodes was abused at the same venue in his side's 37-point loss to Hawthorn in round seven

You really can't read can you. I've never seen so much fail in one thread. It's like I just gave you a hard core slap... Wammm and then you have come back for seconds...
Maybe three times a charm. Maybe you will read it this time. Notice the words "There was no suggestion of racial vilification".



http://www.AFL.com.au/news/2013-05-14/g ... ppropriate

what was he havin a go at his haircut then f wit
he was abused because he was black
maybe no racial terms were used ... on this occasion

but we all know what the motivations for this racist scum was don't we

What so the only reason you would have a go at someone from an indigenous background would be because they were a different colour then you. There is no possible other reason. Damn your a sad one.
Who knows what was said. They could have called him fat, ugly, old, a hack or said something about his mum. All that we do know it that it upset him and that it wasn't race related or the article would have said so rather then totally the opposite. If it had been race related we would have certainly heard a lot more about it down here. That's why I questioned it in the first place because it didn't really make the news like it should have if it is was a racist comment.
Keep spinning out those fairy tale stories if you keep making them up maybe one day you might finally stumble onto the truth .........one day.

Again, Raider Dave, 246 instances of racial abuse in the AFL please.