ohXman wrote:The stadiums made the mistake. :
so the NRL clubs didn't fudge any crowds then ?

ohXman wrote:The stadiums made the mistake. :
sorta like the VFL & just about every venue they use in NSW & QLD eh cockface ?Stewie wrote:The Melbourne Storm CEO disagrees.Xman wrote:The stadiums made the mistake. They even said that at the time![]()
What's the bet the Storm with their News Limited money paid the stadium owners to lie?
No, the NRL didnt do it. The crowds were wrong and they were NRL crowds!Raiderdave wrote:ohXman wrote:The stadiums made the mistake. :
so the NRL clubs didn't fudge any crowds then ?
Find some real proof you waste of flesh. The Storm CEO admitted fudging crowds was rampant in that dirty sport of rl. For shame.Raiderdave wrote:sorta like the VFL & just about every venue they use in NSW & QLD eh cockface ?Stewie wrote:The Melbourne Storm CEO disagrees.Xman wrote:The stadiums made the mistake. They even said that at the time![]()
What's the bet the Storm with their News Limited money paid the stadium owners to lie?![]()
![]()
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
Stewie wrote:Find some real proof you waste of flesh. The Storm CEO admitted fudging crowds was rampant in that dirty sport of rl. For shame.
Good reason not to believe the ratings!Xman wrote:how do you think the TV ratings system works? About 3000 homes from 23M peopleStriker wrote:What a cry baby when faced with the folly of your argument! Since when does 0.0046 percent of a fan base (and be grateful I didn't include the Victory or the Rebels!!) represent a feasible survey sample?Xman wrote:
There werent 10k who voted idiot!![]()
Probably paid off.......![]()
this is a common theme of yours. Just like Raiderdave and his fudging fudging claims.
Both you two refuse to acknowledge data that doesnt suite your argument yet are perfectly happy to accept data that does!
What a pack of losers!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If 80-90% of a sample size of 50 love the product its decent!
Thats unless the websites are fake and the voters bribed
The nRL clubs paid the stadium owners to fudge the crowds. The Storm CEO was very open about everything... except the brown paper bags.Raiderdave wrote:Stewie wrote:Find some real proof you waste of flesh. The Storm CEO admitted fudging crowds was rampant in that dirty sport of rl. For shame.
oh no
no no no
ask Marcus shirtlifter
apparently the NRL didn't fudge any crowds .... the Stadium made a mistake![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
You mean the only things that NRL fans claim they win?Striker wrote:Good reason not to believe the ratings!Xman wrote:how do you think the TV ratings system works? About 3000 homes from 23M peopleStriker wrote:
What a cry baby when faced with the folly of your argument! Since when does 0.0046 percent of a fan base (and be grateful I didn't include the Victory or the Rebels!!) represent a feasible survey sample?![]()
If 80-90% of a sample size of 50 love the product its decent!
Thats unless the websites are fake and the voters bribed
No. But it means your rebuttal that 150 people is a small sample size is hilarious given youre the only one I have heard of who doesn't like AAMI park.Striker wrote:And that doesn't mean I'm wrong! Hundreds of years ago that sort of sample represented those who believed the world was round (1) against those who thought it was flat (150).
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 10 guests