Page 5 of 7

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:09 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
when up against the swines
anytime in Sydney


a kooky japanese cooking show .... OWNS the pathetic swines :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Name me a show that doesn't outrated the NRL in Victoria sa or wa! :lol: its not hard to beat 20k or less....

30 years in prime time for the Swines Wions & the VFL in the Nthn States
1 year in prime time for the NRL in the Sthn States

big difference cockhead :wink:
The NRL has been on foxtel for years. People know its on. The ratings are a good indication of how little people care about RL in AFL states. :wink:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:09 pm
by Raiderdave
VickyKicky wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Xman wrote:
Name me a show that doesn't outrated the NRL in Victoria sa or wa! :lol: its not hard to beat 20k or less....
On a few occassions last year, the nRL rating was so low in Adelaide that a total wasn't even recorded, while in Perth only about 2k tuned in. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Stewie, we all know your a wannabe victardian, so please can you use your amazing powers to explain on the
23rd March 2012, a crowd of 15,599 came to watch 2 teams, both of whom were thousands of miles away from their traditional homes, in Perth, yet the midgets can't even break 10k playing against the biggest ALF team Collington and that's a fact :lol:

plus nearly 22,000 watched Manly & the Warriors in Perth later in the year as well

as you say
Collington .... the self annoited .. biggest football team in the country
attracted a fudged crowd of 8,500 against the Midgets on a beautiful sat arvo

the real crowd was about 4,000
& of that

3,000 were toothless drop kicks from Melbourne ... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:12 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Name me a show that doesn't outrated the NRL in Victoria sa or wa! :lol: its not hard to beat 20k or less....

30 years in prime time for the Swines Wions & the VFL in the Nthn States
1 year in prime time for the NRL in the Sthn States

big difference cockhead :wink:
The NRL has been on foxtel for years. People know its on. The ratings are a good indication of how little people care about RL in AFL states. :wink:

lowest uptake of pay tv is in the sthn states

NRL is new ...in primetime on fta in the singlet wearing states ...

& i predict the NRL will attract more veiwers on fta in Vic .. SA & WA

then vicky kicky does in NSW & QLD

by the end of this current TV deal (2017) :wink:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:12 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Xman wrote:
Name me a show that doesn't outrated the NRL in Victoria sa or wa! :lol: its not hard to beat 20k or less....
On a few occassions last year, the nRL rating was so low in Adelaide that a total wasn't even recorded, while in Perth only about 2k tuned in. :lol: :lol: :lol:
1 year of primetime for the NRL in the **** states
1

meanwhile 30 years of fumbling bumbling & missing in the nthn states ....... & it still struggles to get past 50K :lol: :lol: :lol:
Not sure how much longer Gem want to make a loss by showing the nRL into Adelaide and Perth. 1 year on prime time maybe all the nRL ever get here! :lol:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:13 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
VickyKicky wrote:
Stewie wrote:
On a few occassions last year, the nRL rating was so low in Adelaide that a total wasn't even recorded, while in Perth only about 2k tuned in. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Stewie, we all know your a wannabe victardian, so please can you use your amazing powers to explain on the
23rd March 2012, a crowd of 15,599 came to watch 2 teams, both of whom were thousands of miles away from their traditional homes, in Perth, yet the midgets can't even break 10k playing against the biggest ALF team Collington and that's a fact :lol:

plus nearly 22,000 watched Manly & the Warriors in Perth later in the year as well

as you say
Collington .... the self annoited .. biggest football team in the country
attracted a fudged crowd of 8,500 against the Midgets on a beautiful sat arvo

the real crowd was about 4,000
& of that

3,000 were toothless drop kicks from Melbourne ... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
22k from 1.8m.... :lol:

There are 2 AFL teams in Sydney. Together they get over 30k per home game, not just one of games :wink:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:15 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

30 years in prime time for the Swines Wions & the VFL in the Nthn States
1 year in prime time for the NRL in the Sthn States

big difference cockhead :wink:
The NRL has been on foxtel for years. People know its on. The ratings are a good indication of how little people care about RL in AFL states. :wink:

lowest uptake of pay tv is in the sthn states

NRL is new ...in primetime on fta

& i predict the NRL will attract more veiwers on fta in Vic .. SA & WA

then vicky kicky does in NSW & QLD

by the end of this current TV deal (2017) :wink:
:lol: I hope that wink meant that you were joking. People here have no interest whatsoever in the poor man's pommy rugby.

Is there a game in Adelaide this year Raiderdave? Last year we missed out. The fan was devastated. :lol:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:19 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
On a few occassions last year, the nRL rating was so low in Adelaide that a total wasn't even recorded, while in Perth only about 2k tuned in. :lol: :lol: :lol:
1 year of primetime for the NRL in the **** states
1

meanwhile 30 years of fumbling bumbling & missing in the nthn states ....... & it still struggles to get past 50K :lol: :lol: :lol:
Not sure how much longer Gem want to make a loss by showing the nRL into Adelaide and Perth. 1 year on prime time maybe all the nRL ever get here! :lol:
well all TV stations in the nthn states that have covered it.. have been taking it in the butt with VFL ... for 30 years


at least RL has 4 games that attract decent ratings in the sthn states
whilst vicky kicky gives its carriers ... nothing ... zilch ... nada ... in the nthn states
not a sausage :-k

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:21 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
VickyKicky wrote:


Stewie, we all know your a wannabe victardian, so please can you use your amazing powers to explain on the
23rd March 2012, a crowd of 15,599 came to watch 2 teams, both of whom were thousands of miles away from their traditional homes, in Perth, yet the midgets can't even break 10k playing against the biggest ALF team Collington and that's a fact :lol:

plus nearly 22,000 watched Manly & the Warriors in Perth later in the year as well

as you say
Collington .... the self annoited .. biggest football team in the country
attracted a fudged crowd of 8,500 against the Midgets on a beautiful sat arvo

the real crowd was about 4,000
& of that

3,000 were toothless drop kicks from Melbourne ... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
22k from 1.8m.... :lol:

There are 2 AFL teams in Sydney. Together they get over 30k per home game, not just one of games :wink:

4,000 .... from 2.3 Million in Western Sydney alone
& actually

just 1,000 of them from Western Sydney :lol: :lol:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:23 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
The NRL has been on foxtel for years. People know its on. The ratings are a good indication of how little people care about RL in AFL states. :wink:

lowest uptake of pay tv is in the sthn states

NRL is new ...in primetime on fta

& i predict the NRL will attract more veiwers on fta in Vic .. SA & WA

then vicky kicky does in NSW & QLD

by the end of this current TV deal (2017) :wink:
:lol: I hope that wink meant that you were joking. People here have no interest whatsoever in the poor man's pommy rugby.

Is there a game in Adelaide this year Raiderdave? Last year we missed out. The fan was devastated. :lol:

Swines average on fta after 30 years in Sydney ...... 50K
the Storms after 1 year on fta in Melb ..... 30K

yep

i'm deadly serious shit for brains .... :cool:
NRL to make a mockery of the VFL 's astoundingly low ratings in the Nthn states .... in just 5 years :wink:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:30 pm
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

lowest uptake of pay tv is in the sthn states

NRL is new ...in primetime on fta

& i predict the NRL will attract more veiwers on fta in Vic .. SA & WA

then vicky kicky does in NSW & QLD

by the end of this current TV deal (2017) :wink:
:lol: I hope that wink meant that you were joking. People here have no interest whatsoever in the poor man's pommy rugby.

Is there a game in Adelaide this year Raiderdave? Last year we missed out. The fan was devastated. :lol:

Swines average on fta after 30 years in Sydney ...... 50K
the Storms after 1 year on fta in Melb ..... 30K

yep

i'm deadly serious shit for brains .... :cool:
NRL to make a mockery of the VFL 's astoundingly low ratings in the Nthn states .... in just 5 years :wink:
Your average is complete BS, as the Swans also have people watching on Fox Footy. Sydney has the largest uptake of Foxtel subscribers in the nation, so you can add tens of thousands to the total.

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:31 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

plus nearly 22,000 watched Manly & the Warriors in Perth later in the year as well

as you say
Collington .... the self annoited .. biggest football team in the country
attracted a fudged crowd of 8,500 against the Midgets on a beautiful sat arvo

the real crowd was about 4,000
& of that

3,000 were toothless drop kicks from Melbourne ... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
22k from 1.8m.... :lol:

There are 2 AFL teams in Sydney. Together they get over 30k per home game, not just one of games :wink:

4,000 .... from 2.3 Million in Western Sydney alone
& actually

just 1,000 of them from Western Sydney :lol: :lol:
:lol:

So no one in western Sydney supports the swans? :lol:

Fail

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:33 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

lowest uptake of pay tv is in the sthn states

NRL is new ...in primetime on fta

& i predict the NRL will attract more veiwers on fta in Vic .. SA & WA

then vicky kicky does in NSW & QLD

by the end of this current TV deal (2017) :wink:
:lol: I hope that wink meant that you were joking. People here have no interest whatsoever in the poor man's pommy rugby.

Is there a game in Adelaide this year Raiderdave? Last year we missed out. The fan was devastated. :lol:

Swines average on fta after 30 years in Sydney ...... 50K
the Storms after 1 year on fta in Melb ..... 30K

yep

i'm deadly serious shit for brains .... :cool:
NRL to make a mockery of the VFL 's astoundingly low ratings in the Nthn states .... in just 5 years :wink:
wrong! :roll:

We've already gone through this a million times dumbarse! FTA was near 60k with many games on in the arvo. Plus they had 30k or more on foxtel.

The storm had one outlier. The other games were around 20-25k.

So the swans are 4-5 times more popular. Sounds about right
:lol:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:12 pm
by Raiderdave
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:

lowest uptake of pay tv is in the sthn states

NRL is new ...in primetime on fta

& i predict the NRL will attract more veiwers on fta in Vic .. SA & WA

then vicky kicky does in NSW & QLD

by the end of this current TV deal (2017) :wink:
:lol: I hope that wink meant that you were joking. People here have no interest whatsoever in the poor man's pommy rugby.

Is there a game in Adelaide this year Raiderdave? Last year we missed out. The fan was devastated. :lol:

Swines average on fta after 30 years in Sydney ...... 50K
the Storms after 1 year on fta in Melb ..... 30K

yep

i'm deadly serious shit for brains .... :cool:
NRL to make a mockery of the VFL 's astoundingly low ratings in the Nthn states .... in just 5 years :wink:
Your average is complete BS, as the Swans also have people watching on Fox Footy. Sydney has the largest uptake of Foxtel subscribers in the nation, so you can add tens of thousands to the total.[/quote]

if 50K watch on a service that 100% have
how many do you think watch on one that only 33% have tool ? :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'd say about 15K

so
29 less years & the Storm are half way to where the swines are already :wink:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:14 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:

lowest uptake of pay tv is in the sthn states

NRL is new ...in primetime on fta

& i predict the NRL will attract more veiwers on fta in Vic .. SA & WA

then vicky kicky does in NSW & QLD

by the end of this current TV deal (2017) :wink:
:lol: I hope that wink meant that you were joking. People here have no interest whatsoever in the poor man's pommy rugby.

Is there a game in Adelaide this year Raiderdave? Last year we missed out. The fan was devastated. :lol:

Swines average on fta after 30 years in Sydney ...... 50K
the Storms after 1 year on fta in Melb ..... 30K

yep

i'm deadly serious shit for brains .... :cool:
NRL to make a mockery of the VFL 's astoundingly low ratings in the Nthn states .... in just 5 years :wink:
wrong! :roll:

We've already gone through this a million times dumbarse! FTA was near 60k with many games on in the arvo. Plus they had 30k or more on foxtel.

The storm had one outlier. The other games were around 20-25k.

So the swans are 4-5 times more popular. Sounds about right
:lol:[/quote]

yes we have
& you continue to get it wrong

Swines ... 50K on FTA
about 15K on fox


Storm.... 32K on FTA only

wow
in one year they've got to half way ...... in 5 .. they will be in front :wink:

Re: RL losing it's Heartland to AFL

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:46 am
by Stewie
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

lowest uptake of pay tv is in the sthn states

NRL is new ...in primetime on fta

& i predict the NRL will attract more veiwers on fta in Vic .. SA & WA

then vicky kicky does in NSW & QLD

by the end of this current TV deal (2017) :wink:
:lol: I hope that wink meant that you were joking. People here have no interest whatsoever in the poor man's pommy rugby.

Is there a game in Adelaide this year Raiderdave? Last year we missed out. The fan was devastated. :lol:

Swines average on fta after 30 years in Sydney ...... 50K
the Storms after 1 year on fta in Melb ..... 30K

yep

i'm deadly serious shit for brains .... :cool:
NRL to make a mockery of the VFL 's astoundingly low ratings in the Nthn states .... in just 5 years :wink:
Your average is complete BS, as the Swans also have people watching on Fox Footy. Sydney has the largest uptake of Foxtel subscribers in the nation, so you can add tens of thousands to the total.[/quote]

if 50K watch on a service that 100% have
how many do you think watch on one that only 33% have tool ? :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'd say about 15K

so
29 less years & the Storm are half way to where the swines are already :wink:[/quote]
A large portion of the 33% would be sports fans who bought Fox just for that. I'd probably double that 15k at least for the Swans.