Talking Footy

Hahaha you're stooping to new lows here Xman.

We're talking common sense here and you call for a "detailed" explanation. We dont need to give detail here. The footy's were being mass produced by child slavery. It's just about knowing where your product comes from, how they're produced. Or in other words, professionalism.

Xman wrote:

They didnt know

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hahaha you're stooping to new lows here Xman.

We're talking common sense here and you call for a "detailed" explanation. We dont need to give detail here. The footy's were being mass produced by child slavery. It's just about knowing where your product comes from, how they're produced. Or in other words, professionalism.

Xman wrote:

They didnt know

show me any example where, other than due diligence in the setting of a company take over, a company would regularly examine the internal practices of a contracted company ON A REGULAR BASIS....

And stop avoiding the question...

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hahaha you're stooping to new lows here Xman.

We're talking common sense here and you call for a "detailed" explanation. We dont need to give detail here. The footy's were being mass produced by child slavery. It's just about knowing where your product comes from, how they're produced. Or in other words, professionalism.

Xman wrote:

They didnt know

look out E
hes getting walloped here so....
he'll lock the thread .. & then unlock it after a stern response from forum members who won't tollerate his cr@p
claiming it was a mistake & he really didn't mean to lock it in the first place

naughty naughty

internal practices you say now? How about we be clear on this. Sherrin were illegally contracting slave children to make the balls. Balls are basically their entire business not one of their 'detailed internal practices'.

"The official ball of the AFL" and the AFL...?

Xman wrote:

didnt even know about it

Yes he certainly is gettin a wallopin here. Xman? Pickup yer game.

King-Eliagh wrote:

internal practices you say now? How about we be clear on this. Sherrin were illegally contracting slave children to make the balls. Balls are basically their entire business not one of their 'detailed internal practices'.

"The official ball of the AFL" and the AFL...?

Xman wrote:

didnt even know about it

and when the AFL became aware they terminated the contract.

Youve still shown no proof as usual.

You've provided us all the proof we need Xman.

The AFL

Xman wrote:

didnt even know about it

King-Eliagh wrote:

You've provided us all the proof we need Xman.

The AFL

Xman wrote:

didnt even know about it

No, provide SOME, ANY, A LITTLE, ONE BIT of proof that A single company regularly examines the particular details of a contracted companies work practices..

Seriously, your avoidance of this request is getting embarrassing...

Hahahaha nice try dingbat. I work for a company which does this regularly. We have specific committees in which external contractors are a part of to ensure information and communication occurs. Additionally those who are contracted externally must supply reports based on their work. It's basic good practice Xman. And no I'm not going to provide you with my company details. And no I'm not going to go trawling the net for proof of something I know is basic good organisational practice.

Xman wrote:

they (the AFL) didnt even know about it

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hahahaha nice try dingbat. I work for a company which does this regularly. We have specific committees in which external contractors are a part of to ensure information and communication occurs. Additionally those who are contracted externally must supply reports based on their work. It's basic good practice Xman. And no I'm not going to provide you with my company details. And no I'm not going to go trawling the net for proof of something I know is basic good organisational practice.

Xman wrote:

they (the AFL) didnt even know about it

Not the same thing...do you know in detail how these companies operate? How and where they manufacture their goods? I highly doubt it

How and where they manufacture their goods is not 'detailed' info, its basic required information.

King-Eliagh wrote:

How and where they manufacture their goods is not 'detailed' info, its basic required information.

well I work too you know.

And I know for certainty that my employer doesnt know exactly where each of our suppliers manufacture their products, let alone check this repeatedly.

Well you work for a bogus company, like the AFL

Xman wrote:

they (the AFL) didnt even know

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

How and where they manufacture their goods is not 'detailed' info, its basic required information.

well I work too you know.

And I know for certainty that my employer doesnt know exactly where each of our suppliers manufacture their products, let alone check this repeatedly.

Then your employer is not engaging in best business practice. If I find out who it is I'll avoid them if I can until they catch up with 21st century business.

Striker wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

How and where they manufacture their goods is not 'detailed' info, its basic required information.

well I work too you know.

And I know for certainty that my employer doesnt know exactly where each of our suppliers manufacture their products, let alone check this repeatedly.

Then your employer is not engaging in best business practice. If I find out who it is I'll avoid them if I can until they catch up with 21st century business.

good luck with that!

Anyway, a few years ago i worked for a business that was taken over by another. Even their due diligence didnt find out all details about the companies practices. How many businesses would do this annually for every contractor?