Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

Yes just as i predicted this week, the western bulldogs won. And the results now stand as:

GC --- 0
GWS --- 0
Melb --- 0
Bris --- 0
WB --- 1

Four clear basketcases/tanksters and one slight anomaly there. Perhaps it was a mistake for me to include the western bulldogs in this bet. Time will tell. One thing is clear as day though. The AFL competition this year is the most lopsided its ever been with four - 6 sides fronting as uncompetitive. The top half of the comp is fairly even. But all the same, the competition could quite easily be divided into 2 divisions.

HELLO! KE has ALREADY LOST!!

GC --- 0
GWS --- 0
Melb --- 1 <--------- :D :D :D
Bris --- 0
WB --- 1

Needed to be said. Get the avatar, Xman!

TLPG wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Yes just as i predicted this week, the western bulldogs won. And the results now stand as:

GC --- 0
GWS --- 0
Melb --- 0
Bris --- 0
WB --- 1

Four clear basketcases/tanksters and one slight anomaly there. Perhaps it was a mistake for me to include the western bulldogs in this bet. Time will tell. One thing is clear as day though. The AFL competition this year is the most lopsided its ever been with four - 6 sides fronting as uncompetitive. The top half of the comp is fairly even. But all the same, the competition could quite easily be divided into 2 divisions.

HELLO! KE has ALREADY LOST!!

GC --- 0
GWS --- 0
Melb --- 1 <--------- :D :D :D
Bris --- 0
WB --- 1

Needed to be said. Get the avatar, Xman!

No, one of the teams needs to win twice.

Hahaha, the foot fucker trying to weasel out as usual

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Hahaha, the foot fucker trying to weasel out as usual

Funny on 3 counts

1 you think I'm a podiatrist

2 you think a podiatrist molests feet

3 you think you have any idea about this bet!

Looks like the Lions might get up.

Haha go lions! =D>

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Hahaha, the foot fucker trying to weasel out as usual

Funny on 3 counts

1 you think I'm a podiatrist

2 you think a podiatrist molests feet

3 you think you have any idea about this bet!

4 He thought it was you claiming the win when I was the one who made the error!

Hahaha ahh what a kerfuffle we have in here of late. We have TLPG looking an absolute goose on several occasions in here and its clear for all to see the man doesnt read posts preceding his own posts. In essence the man is having a conversation with his own mind.

Hilarious watching beaussie try and claim this bet was continuing till rd 13

And then we have Xman having the biggest virtual premature ejaculation i've seen since cos lettuce's amusing but profoundly shameful acts in the international forum. Lets just look at how we're standing after 10 rounds of footy now shall we.

The scoreboard reads.

GWS ----- 0
Melb ----- 1 (they managed to squeeze 8 goals in and the AFL clan think they're premiership contenders )
WB ---- 1 (back to copping an absolute belting today and looking their normal basketcase selves again after the sun shined out their derriers last week :D )
GC ---- 0 (getting worse and worse each week by the looks of em. Prime contenders for 2012's number 1 tanksters)
Brisbane --- 1 (looks like the sun shined out their derierres today also. As I said the sun shines out of a skunks arse every now and then )

So after 10 whole rounds of footy not one of these 5 teams have been able to pull off two wins against any of the teams considered competitive at the AFL level. Dear god, has there ever been a more lopsided competition where nearly a third of the competition teams simply arent competitive? Serious problems here and with I think only one week remaining Xman must be shaking in his boots.

Xman you forgot to quote this one, which states the bet is completed "by round 12". These were the terms set after we added the fifth tankster remember. I'd have to say that means that we're done and dusted after this weeks play then, which wouldnt really give you that opportunity you keep referring to as your golden egg 'port adelaide v western bulldogs in rd 12 now would it? Oh dear.

King-Eliagh wrote:

For recording purposes we have agreed the bet stands as the Western bulldogs, brissy lions, GWS, Gold Coast, and Melbourne will all not win two games against an opponent other than themselves (in other words other than against other basketcases/tanksters) by Round 12 of the AFL comp.

The wager of the bet has been agreed as a 1 month avatar bet. The winner having free choice of the losers avatar for this said period.

This has clearly been agreed upon (however if Xman loses we know there's a very high chance his smarty size nuts will shrink to 'hundreds and thousands' effectively reducing his testosterone levels to that of a female mouse foetus making him squirm out of honouring himself and the bet he has agreed to).

How you feeling there Xman? :D

But yeah look maybe if you ask me nicely i'll consider extending the bet to --- the Western bulldogs, brissy lions, GWS, Gold Coast, and Melbourne will all not win two games against an opponent other than themselves (in other words other than against other basketcases/tanksters) by Round 13 of the AFL comp. 'By' round 13 clearly not meaning 'after' round 13, that is. Then you'd get a shot at your lil golden egg PA vs WB game Xman!

Now ask me nicely bitch. :<>

Does "by" mean before?? By the end of round 12 would be at the end of round 12 but that was not what you said. You are probabaly correct KE but it is poorly worded. The bet could be moot if the event occured in round 12. Very confusing.

By round 12 means the completion of that round. Otherwise you would have said by round 11

Xman pies can see the point here. Answer me this question. If i was your boss and I asked you to "get that fukkin report on my desk by close of business, by 5pm today Xmouse you snotty dillbrained weener", would you think your boss means for you to get the report to him after 5pm? I'm afraid if you wish for this extension you will need to ask me nicely bitch :<>

I'll help you out. It'll need to begin with "Dear honorable King, I'd like to ask of you, oh righteoous one, that ..." or something along those lines and so on and so forth. Now Xman, ask nicely bitch. :<>

Ah but you didn't specify the beginning of Round 12 or the end of Round 12, did you?

Answer me this on your anology - did you mean by 5:00:00pm or by 5:00:59pm?

See the problem you created for yourself?

Needed to be said.

TLPG your human characteristics seem to be diminishing by the day. Seriously, you think when someone says you must achieve something by 5pm then this could mean after 5pm?

Please continue TLPG. Humour us some more!

In the mean time Xman, you need to be saying your prayers and asking me nicely ya lil biatch. TLPG's clearly not doing you any favours so I'd get your ass in here sooner rather than later. I'll give you 'by' noon tmw to plead your case and ask me nicely. One tick 'after' noon and the bet stands as is. Comprehende? :<>

King-Eliagh wrote:

TLPG your human characteristics seem to be diminishing by the day. Seriously, you think when someone says you must achieve something by 5pm then this could mean after 5pm?

Please continue TLPG. Humour us some more!

In the mean time Xman, you need to be saying your prayers and asking me nicely ya lil biatch. TLPG's clearly not doing you any favours so I'd get your ass in here sooner rather than later. I'll give you 'by' noon tmw to plead your case and ask me nicely. One tick 'after' noon and the bet stands as is. Comprehende? :<>

Gold Coast, Brisbane, GWS and Melbourne will not win more than 1 match each against an opponent other than themselves (i.e GWS GC Bris, Mel) by mid season/after Rd 12 in the AFL comp.

This is part of your original post. So stop your whining you blouse!