Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

Rule two of the BS file reads

2. Only challenged claims that are deemed appropriate by the TFC moderator will be entered into the BS file. Examples of inappropriate claims are: i. Predictions, ii. Clear personal opinions, iii. Issues that are impossible to prove, iv. Issues that are too big (eg: which is the bigger code)

Note the bolded area which you wrote yourself Xman. I'm sorry but this claim doesnt even belong here as it was clearly impossible to prove and disprove. TLPG has done a particularly poor job of disproving the claim. Well actually, he's done nothing.

Rubbish it's impossible to prove. They were either given the instruction or they weren't! If they were dave needs to show proof.

That clause is for broader issues of opinion, like which code is has the better looking female fans, or debates where there is no way of measuring quantity.

Dave could well have been privy to inside information and thus we have no proof but his word. Considering he's shown us all up on a number of occasions now i.e. GWS v Swans crowd attendance, closeness comparison of round 1 in both codes, Broncos/Lions memberships - I wouldnt put it past him that he knows what the swans were ordered.

Xman don't feed the troll. He knows he doesn't have a case and yet he persists. I know you're supposed to wait a week, but I'd make the decision now and then lock this thread to stop the trolling.

TLPG, Xman is making a contribution, albeit a silly one. Leave him be.

On the other matter, I'm not really making a case in here, its not even my case. Just helping our mod and TLPG with the complexities of the case. Yes, unfortunately, lock this thread at once. It's been clear that the result would be made without any lateral thinking on the part of AFL competition enthusiasts/obsessives, as per usual. I'd like 10 bs points if you can permit.

Huh? Did someone speak? Oh I must be seeing things.

Tut tut now TLPG, we all know the this type of ignoring behaviour belongs to children between the ages of 7 and 15. Now just be happy that you've won the challenge. You've been awesome at proving absolutely nothing.

Xman, I just checked and it's been more than a week. If you wouldn't mind making it official?

Verdict: bs point for Raider Dave and KE!

Good! Might be an idea to lock this before KE runs in and carries on like the whiner he is.

Xman I asked for 10 bs points, now gimme.

And TLPG you're not top dog in here no more, I still am, so stop ordering Xman around like he's your lil bitch. He's my lil bitch.

Stupid whining troll. Nick off.

What about this weeks North Melbourne 183 - Greater Western Sydney 54 result!

More proof the swans were ordered to run dead.

Xman wrote:

Verdict: bs point for Raider Dave and KE!

Raider now on 10 and KE on 2 BS points. Way to go guys.