what do you think a fridge magnet membership costs for the 8K non NSW members ....Xman wrote:Last I checked they didn't offer single game memberships too!Raiderdave wrote:Broncos 25,175 .... about 22,000 in QldXman wrote:They have more members than the broncos!
Swans 22,000.... about 14,000 in NSW
not even close
what a few hundred to a few games ?Xman wrote:What? The Melbourne based Sydney members go to the games they play in Melbourne, not just a single game or unticketted!
How the hell would you know?Raiderdave wrote:what a few hundred to a few games ?Xman wrote:What? The Melbourne based Sydney members go to the games they play in Melbourne, not just a single game or unticketted!
well how the hell would you ?Xman wrote:How the hell would you know?Raiderdave wrote:what a few hundred to a few games ?Xman wrote:What? The Melbourne based Sydney members go to the games they play in Melbourne, not just a single game or unticketted!
I see the games down in Melbourne. I have been to the games. There are many Melbourne base swans fans. They are ticketed for games in Melbourne.Raiderdave wrote:well how the hell would you ?Xman wrote:How the hell would you know?Raiderdave wrote:what a few hundred to a few games ?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Beaussie wrote:I have a bet already in place with Raider. Not interested in anything you have to offer KE. Sorry
The tsunami has definitely passed.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
You're just as stupid as dave. The Sydney media use the term tsunami the AFL did not. Yet now use the term against the AFL and it's supporters as if they used it, and to show the club is not meeting expectation. Yet these expectations were falsely introduced by the Sydney media.King-Eliagh wrote:Beaussie wrote:I have a bet already in place with Raider. Not interested in anything you have to offer KE. Sorry
But Raider I'm predicting the crowd to be close to 50k for this one if the weather is fine and balmy. Our footy club has only recently sent the message out to all players to head to the game. So I'm thinking a lot of others will be buying up tiks in the next week. And as I said, if its fine weather the token sydney siders will roll on out in force. Although it is at homebush, which token supporters tend to shy away from... Still i stand by my bet. 50k if fine, 36k if rainy.
Good luck to the both of you punks in putting your hide on the line...although beaussie should count himself very lucky indeed with the bet he's got.
Xman hows about you shut yo lilly ass yappin pie eater. You and beaussie whole heartedly follow and eat up the propaganda of the media in relation to the tsunami. Time and time again the pair of you make foolish comments based on the hype of innacurate media sensationalising. So, I'll associate the tsunami with the pair of you, and cos, who believes the tsunami is spreading across the world at a rapid and unfathomable rateXman wrote:You're just as stupid as dave. The Sydney media use the term tsunami the AFL did not. Yet now use the term against the AFL and it's supporters as if they used it, and to show the club is not meeting expectation. Yet these expectations were falsely introduced by the Sydney media.King-Eliagh wrote:Beaussie wrote:I have a bet already in place with Raider. Not interested in anything you have to offer KE. Sorry
But Raider I'm predicting the crowd to be close to 50k for this one if the weather is fine and balmy. Our footy club has only recently sent the message out to all players to head to the game. So I'm thinking a lot of others will be buying up tiks in the next week. And as I said, if its fine weather the token sydney siders will roll on out in force. Although it is at homebush, which token supporters tend to shy away from... Still i stand by my bet. 50k if fine, 36k if rainy.
Good luck to the both of you punks in putting your hide on the line...although beaussie should count himself very lucky indeed with the bet he's got.
, whenever I want...because... its valid to do so.xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
I have said all along that the giants will probably average around 15k attendance and 10k members in their first year, which is hardly a tsunami!King-Eliagh wrote:Xman hows about you shut yo lilly ass yappin pie eater. You and beaussie whole heartedly follow and eat up the propaganda of the media in relation to the tsunami. Time and time again the pair of you make foolish comments based on the hype of innacurate media sensationalising. So, I'll associate the tsunami with the pair of you, and cos, who believes the tsunami is spreading across the world at a rapid and unfathomable rateXman wrote:You're just as stupid as dave. The Sydney media use the term tsunami the AFL did not. Yet now use the term against the AFL and it's supporters as if they used it, and to show the club is not meeting expectation. Yet these expectations were falsely introduced by the Sydney media.King-Eliagh wrote:
But Raider I'm predicting the crowd to be close to 50k for this one if the weather is fine and balmy. Our footy club has only recently sent the message out to all players to head to the game. So I'm thinking a lot of others will be buying up tiks in the next week. And as I said, if its fine weather the token sydney siders will roll on out in force. Although it is at homebush, which token supporters tend to shy away from... Still i stand by my bet. 50k if fine, 36k if rainy.
Good luck to the both of you punks in putting your hide on the line...although beaussie should count himself very lucky indeed with the bet he's got.
You got that biatch?
What do you think? Sounds about right? Agree. Well done to the AFL for securing the future of the game by introducing clubs in new markets to drive up the TV rights deal.pussycat wrote:$20m will buy a lot of tickets. =D> =D> =D> well done AFL for looking after all your clubs =D> =D> =D>
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests