Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:26 am
Talking Footy
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Page 5 of 8
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:41 am
Temporarily. The Lions haven't updated their numbers for a few days.
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:03 am
NSWAFL wrote:Temporarily. The Lions haven't updated their numbers for a few days.
phhhtttt ...... hundreds behind ... soon to be thousands
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:28 am
Bullsh!t.
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:55 am
is your main language ...... yes we knowNSWAFL wrote:Bullsh!t.
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:37 pm
No it's yours, Dave. You wouldn't the truth if it switched off the lights at Bruce Stadium!
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:41 pm
I wouldn't the truthNSWAFL wrote:No it's yours, Dave. You wouldn't the truth if it switched off the lights at Bruce Stadium!
> ...... 
yes I would
or would I ?
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:44 pm
No you would not. You are a born liar.
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:39 pm
Exactly. The Lions haven't updated their number for over a week now.NSWAFL wrote:Temporarily. The Lions haven't updated their numbers for a few days.
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:56 am
Beaussie wrote:Exactly. The Lions haven't updated their number for over a week now.NSWAFL wrote:Temporarily. The Lions haven't updated their numbers for a few days.
sure they haven't beaussie ...
sure
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:42 am
So how is the search for a major sponsor going for the Raiders, Dave?
"annoucenment imminent"
Sure it is, Dave...
Sure
"annoucenment imminent"
Sure it is, Dave...
Sure
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:50 am
Xman ... I propose a new rule .. that any poster who takes a thread ... " off topic" is warned &NSWAFL wrote:So how is the search for a major sponsor going for the Raiders, Dave?
"annoucenment imminent"
Sure it is, Dave...
Sure
his or her posts attempting to do so
removed from that thread
we've had some debate completely rail roaded recently .... NSWAFL & Cuzzy being the main culprits
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:54 am
It's not off topic, Dave! I was demonstrating how hypocritical your jibe was! You don't believe Beaussie about Lions membership numbers. We don't believe you about the Raider's and their major sponsorship position. Relevance = 100 percent.
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:04 am
NSWAFL wrote:It's not off topic, Dave! I was demonstrating how hypocritical your jibe was! You don't believe Beaussie about Lions membership numbers. We don't believe you about the Raider's and their major sponsorship position. Relevance = 100 percent.
Xman .... ??
theres potential for threads to go off track all ova the place
NSWAFL is trying to disrupt this site again
he needs to be warned
Re: Reds have 26,196 Members / Broncos Just 13,416 Members
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:24 am
Sooky Sooky La La!