Page 5 of 6
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 6:36 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Censored
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 6:38 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
cos789 wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:So, which clubs would be known more, AFL or NRL clubs?
Imo, NRL clubs easily.
Start proving it, or as usual you are just pissing in the wind.
You should talk sara, I see you have been very very quiet since the BS files started, what's the matter sara, worried you''ll fuck up as usual and get called on it?
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:16 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
xman, here it is, is the bs file that is locked worthy of being opened?
I think it is.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
SL, RFL and NRL clubs are rep teams these days huh?
NSWAFL wrote:
Yes, and they always have been. They are not clubs.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Wigan, Warrington, South Sydney, Leeds and Salford are rep teams?
NSWAFL wrote:
I never said that! Those teams ARE club sides. And only one of them is Australian so you're still four short of Aussie Rules!
Not what you said above huh?
See the bit in Red?
Read the posts in order.
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:34 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
xman is saying NSWAFL did not state that these clubs are rep sides, WTF?, it's there in black and white.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
SL, RFL and NRL clubs are rep teams these days huh?
NSWAFL wrote:
Yes, and they always have been. They are not clubs.
Are you blind, or just biased and looking after your mates?
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:41 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:xman is saying NSWAFL did not state that these clubs are rep sides, WTF?, it's there in black and white.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
SL, RFL and NRL clubs are rep teams these days huh?
NSWAFL wrote:
Yes, and they always have been. They are not clubs.
Are you blind, or just biased and looking after your mates?
This wasn't your challenge!!
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:43 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:I call BS file against NSWAFL again.
Wigan, Warrington, South Sydney, Leeds and Salford are clubs sides, NSWAFL says they are rep sides.
This was your challenge. Find me where NSWAFL says this!!
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:56 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Right frigging here straight after my post, see, after my post.
NSWAFL wrote:
Yes, and they always have been. They are not clubs.
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 9:11 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Right frigging here straight after my post, see, after my post.
NSWAFL wrote:
Yes, and they always have been. They are not clubs.
He was referring to "SL, RFL and NRL clubs are rep teams these days huh?"
Not your claim which was "Wigan, Warrington, South Sydney, Leeds and Salford are rep teams?" which is what you claimed.
Why would he immediately state he never said a claim that he actually made in black and white?
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 9:25 pm
by NSWAFL
It's shame this doesn't qualify as a reverse BS file entry. I wish it did! Talk about abusing the process!
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 9:33 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Fmd you guys are getting pettier by the hour.
See the first 3?
Well do you?
I'll put them in bold to help.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2692&start=45
ParraEelsNRL wrote:So ESL, RFL, NRL, ARL, QLDRL, NSWRL and NZRL which are all fully pro teams don't count?
Hmmmmm.
Very next post from NSWAFL was.
NSWAFL wrote:They are rep teams, not clubs.
Followed by me saying.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:SL, RFL and NRL clubs are rep teams these days huh?
Followed by NSWAFL stating this.
NSWAFL wrote:Yes, and they always have been.They are not clubs.
These posts are all in order, look for yourself.
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 9:37 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:I call BS file against NSWAFL again.
Wigan, Warrington, South Sydney, Leeds and Salford are clubs sides, NSWAFL says they are rep sides!
Yet here is your challenge. He never said this.
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 9:55 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Read what I just put in.
And they are in order, reread the page.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:SL, RFL and NRL clubs are rep teams these days huh?
NSWAFL wrote:Yes, and they always have been.They are not clubs.
SL clubs are not rep, RFL clubs are not rep (pre SL in 1996) and we all know NRL teams are clubs.
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:09 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Read what I just put in.
And they are in order, reread the page.
ParraEelsNRL wrote:SL, RFL and NRL clubs are rep teams these days huh?
NSWAFL wrote:Yes, and they always have been.They are not clubs.
SL clubs are not rep, RFL clubs are not rep (pre SL in 1996) and we all know NRL teams are clubs.
You didn't challenge this before. You challenged something else entirely, as documented above.
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:22 pm
by NSWAFL
I'm going to jump in here and say that I didn't see "clubs" in Parra's quote. I only saw SL, RFL and NRL, hence my comment. Parra should learn to put his questions more clearly if he is going to bait a BS file entry. I believe that was his intention here.
Re: AFL vs NRL clubs known outside Australia
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:31 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I have baited you in one thread only to teach you a lesson, you didn't learn from it though and that thread is about Newcastle and its AFL side.