Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

hmmmm..... you may have a point

interesting an AFL don't belong in the same sentence
what eva could he have been talking about

Even that sentence doesn't make sense!

I thought you said people from Melbourne were the dumbest in the country! You're living proof to the contrary!

Where is your proof by the way? After all you said you had lots!

oh they're utter deadshits
we have continual proof here ... every time you ... or NSWAFL or intestines .. or ol tipsy place their fingers on the keyboard & start typing

So your proof for Melbourne being full of people with low intelligence is a sample of 3people out of 4million.

Nice and scientific I see.

I live in Sydney. Bang goes your theory, Dave.

NSWAFL wrote:

I live in Sydney. Bang goes your theory, Dave.

you're a **** from victardia or some other retarted singletball state ... who's moved there
no self respecting born n raised Sydneysider .. would have anything to do with Vicky Kicky

K

Faced with a fact, we get a burp in reply.

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

I live in Sydney. Bang goes your theory, Dave.

you're a **** from victardia or some other retarted singletball state ... who's moved there
no self respecting born n raised Sydneysider .. would have anything to do with Vicky Kicky

K

I live in Sydney because I was born here. So shove that up your jumper and knit it, troll.

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

I live in Sydney. Bang goes your theory, Dave.

you're a **** from victardia or some other retarted singletball state ... who's moved there
no self respecting born n raised Sydneysider .. would have anything to do with Vicky Kicky

K

I live in Sydney because I was born here. So shove that up your jumper and knit it, troll.

sure you were .......

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

you're a **** from victardia or some other retarted singletball state ... who's moved there
no self respecting born n raised Sydneysider .. would have anything to do with Vicky Kicky

K

I live in Sydney because I was born here. So shove that up your jumper and knit it, troll.

sure you were .......

Lol

It doesn't compute to this dope that there are people who live in NSW who like ARs

But its hardly surprising. Remember, although 100k might be low figures for TV, 100k is still a decent number of people who turn the TV on and watch the swans. 30k at the games is also a decent number. There are AFL fans in Sydney no matter how much you deny it.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

I live in Sydney because I was born here. So shove that up your jumper and knit it, troll.

sure you were .......

Lol

It doesn't compute to this dope that there are people who live in NSW who like ARs

But its hardly surprising. Remember, although 100k might be low figures for TV, 100k is still a decent number of people who turn the TV on and watch the swans. 30k at the games is also a decent number. There are AFL fans in Sydney no matter how much you deny it.

I said Sydney ... not NSW
they're are some **** who live inside NSW just north of the Murray that the rest of the state is quite embarrased about

100K .. .... its 55K
& out of near 5 million people .... thats woeful
its just a tad more then 1 in 100 Sydneysiders who have even the slighest interest in giggleball ... that 1 being an expat ******* **** .. more then likely

there are fumbleball fans in Sydney ..... just not very many

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

sure you were .......

Lol

It doesn't compute to this dope that there are people who live in NSW who like ARs

But its hardly surprising. Remember, although 100k might be low figures for TV, 100k is still a decent number of people who turn the TV on and watch the swans. 30k at the games is also a decent number. There are AFL fans in Sydney no matter how much you deny it.

I said Sydney ... not NSW
they're are some **** who live inside NSW just north of the Murray that the rest of the state is quite embarrased about

100K .. .... its 55K
& out of near 5 million people .... thats woeful
its just a tad more then 1 in 100 Sydneysiders who have even the slighest interest in giggleball ... that 1 being an expat ******* **** .. more then likely

there are fumbleball fans in Sydney ..... just not very many

55k plus foxtel, which often shows the same game at the same time ad free.

Again, whether those ratings are good or bad for TV is irrelevant. Fact is there are still plenty of people living in Sydney who follow ARs. Far more than following RL in all states other than NSW and QLD.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Lol

It doesn't compute to this dope that there are people who live in NSW who like ARs

But its hardly surprising. Remember, although 100k might be low figures for TV, 100k is still a decent number of people who turn the TV on and watch the swans. 30k at the games is also a decent number. There are AFL fans in Sydney no matter how much you deny it.

I said Sydney ... not NSW
they're are some **** who live inside NSW just north of the Murray that the rest of the state is quite embarrased about

100K .. .... its 55K
& out of near 5 million people .... thats woeful
its just a tad more then 1 in 100 Sydneysiders who have even the slighest interest in giggleball ... that 1 being an expat ******* **** .. more then likely

there are fumbleball fans in Sydney ..... just not very many

55k plus foxtel, which often shows the same game at the same time ad free.

Again, whether those ratings are good or bad for TV is irrelevant. Fact is there are still plenty of people living in Sydney who follow ARs. Far more than following RL in all states other than NSW and QLD.

plenty .... the where the F are they then ?

25K at games
55K on TV

thats not plenty in anyones terminology unless you're a demented gimp... thats 1 in 60 people in Sydney
the game is quite .. unpopular .. in Sydney & thats not an unreasonable assessment at all.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

I said Sydney ... not NSW
they're are some **** who live inside NSW just north of the Murray that the rest of the state is quite embarrased about

100K .. .... its 55K
& out of near 5 million people .... thats woeful
its just a tad more then 1 in 100 Sydneysiders who have even the slighest interest in giggleball ... that 1 being an expat ******* **** .. more then likely

there are fumbleball fans in Sydney ..... just not very many

55k plus foxtel, which often shows the same game at the same time ad free.

Again, whether those ratings are good or bad for TV is irrelevant. Fact is there are still plenty of people living in Sydney who follow ARs. Far more than following RL in all states other than NSW and QLD.

plenty .... the where the F are they then ?

25K at games
55K on TV

thats not plenty in anyones terminology unless you're a demented gimp... thats 1 in 60 people in Sydney
the game is quite .. unpopular .. in Sydney & thats not an unreasonable assessment at all.

I noticed you have ignored the simultaneous foxtel and FTA coverage the swans get. Therefore their ratings are close to 100k or sometimes higher.

Going by your logic the number of fans is limited to the people who watch the game on TV and attend the game. So the swans get 26k plus 100k on TV (foxtel included) per home game. That's 1 in 40 people who follow AFL.

The NRL get 400k on TV per home and away game, plus 17k average attendance. That's 1 in 12 people who follow NRL in Sydney.

So therefore there are 3.3 NRL fans for every AFL fan in Sydney. Nice logic.

Hardly a small following wouldn't you say?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

55k plus foxtel, which often shows the same game at the same time ad free.

Again, whether those ratings are good or bad for TV is irrelevant. Fact is there are still plenty of people living in Sydney who follow ARs. Far more than following RL in all states other than NSW and QLD.

plenty .... the where the F are they then ?

25K at games
55K on TV

thats not plenty in anyones terminology unless you're a demented gimp... thats 1 in 60 people in Sydney
the game is quite .. unpopular .. in Sydney & thats not an unreasonable assessment at all.

I noticed you have ignored the simultaneous foxtel and FTA coverage the swans get. Therefore their ratings are close to 100k or sometimes higher.

Going by your logic the number of fans is limited to the people who watch the game on TV and attend the game. So the swans get 26k plus 100k on TV (foxtel included) per home game. That's 1 in 40 people who follow AFL.

The NRL get 400k on TV per home and away game, plus 17k average attendance. That's 1 in 12 people who follow NRL in Sydney.

So therefore there are 3.3 NRL fans for every AFL fan in Sydney. Nice logic.

Hardly a small following wouldn't you say?

45K ... on pay .........
if its 55K on FTA ... & pay reaches only 1/3 of Sydneysiders .. then I'd say 18K to 20K on average is a fairer pay audience wouldn't you

afterall 175K was the " total " national rating for one pay game for the Swans ... metro n regional
to suggest a game that is as popular as a fart in an elevator in sydney could attract nearly a third of the national audience ... is hilarious

so we're back to about 75K on the box ... & 25K odd at the game ... a nice round 100,000 all up out of 5 Million ish who have interest in the Swans to some degree
1 in 50
appalling at best

oh & your lame attempt at working out that the NRL ( the entire code ) have just 3.3 times the number of fans in Sydney as the Swans ...
so just 330,000 all up ..needs some correcting don't you think

400K on TV ... thats either 200K per Sydney club ... or 200K for 1 & a mixture of fans of the other 7.5 sydney clubs watching the non Sydney club
remember thats an average for any NRL game ... an all Sydney games attracts more then that ..

so we have .... 200K on TV .. per club & 17K at games .... per club
217K X ... 8.5

thats 1.8 Million who are interested in League to some degree in Sydney
18 times the swans figure

K

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

plenty .... the where the F are they then ?

25K at games
55K on TV

thats not plenty in anyones terminology unless you're a demented gimp... thats 1 in 60 people in Sydney
the game is quite .. unpopular .. in Sydney & thats not an unreasonable assessment at all.

I noticed you have ignored the simultaneous foxtel and FTA coverage the swans get. Therefore their ratings are close to 100k or sometimes higher.

Going by your logic the number of fans is limited to the people who watch the game on TV and attend the game. So the swans get 26k plus 100k on TV (foxtel included) per home game. That's 1 in 40 people who follow AFL.

The NRL get 400k on TV per home and away game, plus 17k average attendance. That's 1 in 12 people who follow NRL in Sydney.

So therefore there are 3.3 NRL fans for every AFL fan in Sydney. Nice logic.

Hardly a small following wouldn't you say?

45K ... on pay .........
if its 55K on FTA ... & pay reaches only 1/3 of Sydneysiders .. then I'd say 18K to 20K on average is a fairer pay audience wouldn't you

afterall 175K was the " total " national rating for one pay game for the Swans ... metro n regional
to suggest a game that is as popular as a fart in an elevator in sydney could attract nearly a third of the national audience ... is hilarious

so we're back to about 75K on the box ... & 25K odd at the game ... a nice round 100,000 all up out of 5 Million ish who have interest in the Swans to some degree
1 in 50
appalling at best

oh & your lame attempt at working out that the NRL ( the entire code ) have just 3.3 times the number of fans in Sydney as the Swans ...
so just 330,000 all up ..needs some correcting don't you think

400K on TV ... thats either 200K per Sydney club ... or 200K for 1 & a mixture of fans of the other 7.5 sydney clubs watching the non Sydney club
remember thats an average for any NRL game ... an all Sydney games attracts more then that ..

so we have .... 200K on TV .. per club & 17K at games .... per club
217K X ... 8.5

thats 1.8 Million who are interested in League to some degree in Sydney
18 times the swans figure

K

I only replied with that ridiculous example to show how farcical your logic is. You cannot simply add the tv ratings and crowd figures together to calculate the number of fans!!

A popular game of RL will rate 450k in Sydney. To say that only fans of these two teams watch the game is insane.

Proof is when a game is shown that does not involve a team from that city. Are the ratings zero? Of course not!

Therefore a fn game of RL in Sydney will be watched by many fans of different clubs. The same group will probably watch a number of games that weekend. You cannot just add the ratings for each game and say there are that many fans.

You also cannot simply add the ratings and crowds together and say that is the total number of fans. People have more things to do in their lives than watch tv, yet still support the game and a team.

You're a very simple guy aren't you.

See why he's nothing more than a burp machine, Xman?

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

you're a **** from victardia or some other retarted singletball state ... who's moved there
no self respecting born n raised Sydneysider .. would have anything to do with Vicky Kicky

K

I live in Sydney because I was born here. So shove that up your jumper and knit it, troll.

sure you were .......

February 25, 1979 in Campbelltown, bub! Want me to scan my birth certificate and show you? If you repeat that allegation again the post gets reported.