Page 5 of 6
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 2:06 pm
by Topper
That is not up front because that is not about NRL Club Memberships. That is about Leagues Club memberships. You are being fooled.
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 2:09 pm
by cooee
It says NRL Club Memberships right at the top.
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 2:11 pm
by Topper
And it's a lie. You are being fooled. That is the culture of RL.
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:11 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
And 4 years ago the NRL would've been lucky to have 4k across the board, so why put shit on the code for finally doing something about it and growing it from such a small number to 20k under 200,000 in a few years?
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:17 pm
by cooee
eels fan wrote:And 4 years ago the NRL would've been lucky to have 4k across the board, so why put **** on the code for finally doing something about it and growing it from such a small number to 20k under 200,000 in a few years?
It's fear.
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:22 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Of course it is because they know that if the growth continues like it has for the first 4 years, we'll be up around 400,000 within 4 more years and they'll be looking at it and shitting themselves knowing the NRL is closing in.
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:40 pm
by Topper
It's not happening. There is no independant evidence that it is.
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:15 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
180,000 last year would suggest otherwise don't you think dumbarse?
Damn Tipsey, you haven't improved at all in the last month.
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:30 pm
by Topper
Prove it.
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:38 am
by Raiderdave
cooee wrote:eels fan wrote:And 4 years ago the NRL would've been lucky to have 4k across the board, so why put **** on the code for finally doing something about it and growing it from such a small number to 20k under 200,000 in a few years?
It's fear.
this
these derpball fans are stunned
thinking we still had the numbers of members we had 5 years ago .... 25% growth year on year for the last 5 years has been a wonderful result for the NRL & its clubs with 220K members for 2012 .. from about 60K in 2005
so their reaction is complete denial ...
nup .... can't be .. nope .. no way
they are soooooooo delusional .. they simply think its all made up
what utter wombats they are .... its hilarious to watch them squirm with fear
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:15 am
by Beaussie
It's like your average NRL crowd numbers. You lot can try all you like to make things look spectacular when coming off such a pitiful small base figure. Fact remains, the membership numbers like the average NRL crowd numbers remain embarrassingly low for a code that likes to think of itself as Number 2 in this country. I'd suggest the A-League is doing just as well if not better on both counts when compared to the NRL. Oh the shame. lol
Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:31 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:It's like your average NRL crowd numbers. You lot can try all you like to make things look spectacular when coming off such a pitiful small base figure. Fact remains, the membership numbers like the average NRL crowd numbers remain embarrassingly low for a code that likes to think of itself as Number 2 in this country. I'd suggest the A-League is doing just as well if not better on both counts when compared to the NRL. Oh the shame. lol
whilst AFL KI's are all heading south
it is truly a sport in decline
the NRL's in difficult economic times ... everything associated with this code continue to head North
it will be THE sporting comp of the next 2 decades
nothing surer

Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:35 am
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:It's like your average NRL crowd numbers. You lot can try all you like to make things look spectacular when coming off such a pitiful small base figure. Fact remains, the membership numbers like the average NRL crowd numbers remain embarrassingly low for a code that likes to think of itself as Number 2 in this country. I'd suggest the A-League is doing just as well if not better on both counts when compared to the NRL. Oh the shame. lol
whilst AFL KI's are all heading south
it is truly a sport in decline
May I remind you of something.
Raiderdave wrote:things like memberships & attendances .. sponsorships merchandising etc are big players too & we are well behind the AFL on most of these KI's
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2334
Raiderdave wrote:the NRL's in difficult economic times ... everything associated with this code continue to head North
it will be THE sporting comp of the next 2 decades
nothing surer

Dream on

Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:55 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:It's like your average NRL crowd numbers. You lot can try all you like to make things look spectacular when coming off such a pitiful small base figure. Fact remains, the membership numbers like the average NRL crowd numbers remain embarrassingly low for a code that likes to think of itself as Number 2 in this country. I'd suggest the A-League is doing just as well if not better on both counts when compared to the NRL. Oh the shame. lol
whilst AFL KI's are all heading south
it is truly a sport in decline
May I remind you of something.
Raiderdave wrote:things like memberships & attendances .. sponsorships merchandising etc are big players too & we are well behind the AFL on most of these KI's
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2334
Raiderdave wrote:the NRL's in difficult economic times ... everything associated with this code continue to head North
it will be THE sporting comp of the next 2 decades
nothing surer

Dream on

the AFL is a dinosaur
simply nothing going for it ...........a boring lopsided domestic comp , failed expansion
no representative program domestic or otherwise
no international presence at all .... zero
geez
what a nightmare .... for you that is

Re: Brumbies 6,000 Members / Raiders 2,000 Members
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:58 am
by Beaussie
Haha, our expansion clubs are already doing better than long established NRL clubs in so called RL heartland. You're an idiot Raider.
