Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

The money thing you may be close with there cos but we will see. As far as I've read though crowds are up and tv audiences are up. This pendulum notion you introduce to claim that 2012 will be a bad year is just one big ass assumption.

And Topper me boy! Sheesh read my signature and you might see your foolishness, out of touchness, and under educated self reflected. A liar though not, I havent thought you have lied yet Topper me boy.

E

here is the truth .. gospel .. about how our great game performed in 2011
better then any other sport in the nation

don't be deflected by these excuse making fumbleball nay sayers who stumble around .. stunned by how well the NRL is actually going ... & just keep doing these all day to cope with it

its a great read
100% accurate ... including the " ticketed membership numbers for the last 2 years beaussie ... on page 15

enjoy
http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/nrl/2011_ ... e_game.pdf

This is riveting comical stuff by the NRL

Maybe that's where the NRL will be in five years time, AFL Warrior. On the Comedy Channel.

Raiderdave wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

The money thing you may be close with there cos but we will see. As far as I've read though crowds are up and tv audiences are up. This pendulum notion you introduce to claim that 2012 will be a bad year is just one big ass assumption.

And Topper me boy! Sheesh read my signature and you might see your foolishness, out of touchness, and under educated self reflected. A liar though not, I havent thought you have lied yet Topper me boy.

E

here is the truth .. gospel .. about how our great game performed in 2011
better then any other sport in the nation

don't be deflected by these excuse making fumbleball nay sayers who stumble around .. stunned by how well the NRL is actually going ... & just keep doing these all day to cope with it

its a great read
100% accurate ... including the " ticketed membership numbers for the last 2 years beaussie ... on page 15

enjoy
http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/nrl/2011_ ... e_game.pdf

Gospel eh?

Funny you seem confused over at LU with the NRL's fudged figures.

the NRL needs to explain why the F'ing hell the membership numbers from their state of the game report were different to their own media releases in April .

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showp ... tcount=685

Beaussie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

The money thing you may be close with there cos but we will see. As far as I've read though crowds are up and tv audiences are up. This pendulum notion you introduce to claim that 2012 will be a bad year is just one big ass assumption.

And Topper me boy! Sheesh read my signature and you might see your foolishness, out of touchness, and under educated self reflected. A liar though not, I havent thought you have lied yet Topper me boy.

E

here is the truth .. gospel .. about how our great game performed in 2011
better then any other sport in the nation

don't be deflected by these excuse making fumbleball nay sayers who stumble around .. stunned by how well the NRL is actually going ... & just keep doing these all day to cope with it

its a great read
100% accurate ... including the " ticketed membership numbers for the last 2 years beaussie ... on page 15

enjoy
http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/nrl/2011_ ... e_game.pdf

Gospel eh?

Funny you seem confused over at LU with the NRL's fudged figures.

the NRL needs to explain why the F'ing hell the membership numbers from their state of the game report were different to their own media releases in April .

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showp ... tcount=685

the discrepency in the " total" membership numbers was an " oversight , with some clubs incorrectly reported .. the Raiders being one "
everything else was double checked

gospel .. is the rest

Oh that is a terrific pick up, Beaussie!

Topper wrote:

Oh that is a terrific pick up, Beaussie!

beaussie couldn't pick up if he were the only male at Slut convention

And all we get again is a burp from the burp machine.

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

E

here is the truth .. gospel .. about how our great game performed in 2011
better then any other sport in the nation

don't be deflected by these excuse making fumbleball nay sayers who stumble around .. stunned by how well the NRL is actually going ... & just keep doing these all day to cope with it

its a great read
100% accurate ... including the " ticketed membership numbers for the last 2 years beaussie ... on page 15

enjoy
http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/nrl/2011_ ... e_game.pdf

Gospel eh?

Funny you seem confused over at LU with the NRL's fudged figures.

the NRL needs to explain why the F'ing hell the membership numbers from their state of the game report were different to their own media releases in April .

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showp ... tcount=685

the discrepency in the " total" membership numbers was an " oversight , with some clubs incorrectly reported .. the Raiders being one "
everything else was double checked

gospel .. is the rest

Hahaha, an "oversight" eh? One of your best Raider.

Oversight = burp.

Dear AFL boys how is it going explaining the vast difference between claimed AFL membership eg Richmond 42k, and somewhat lower average home crowds like 40% and thats assuming no one from the opposition shows up.

Nationwide support for the club is the explanation.

So the Topper "theory" is that people buy Richmond membership for games that they will never go to. That makes perfect sense.

Yes it does, because that is true support. Something that NRL clubs don't have a clue about. I'm not surprised you do not understand this concept.

Dear Topper you are dead right as there is no way I will understand why someone would pay for something they had no intention of using. Of course I dont believe it either. Why cant the AFL crew simply acknowledge that the definition of AFL membership" is a pretty broad one and relates to more than fully ticketed members.