Talking Footy

Topper wrote:

You're wrong. Training regime has nothing to do with it. You're either strong or you're not. Ablett is strong. Hayne is strong. They are each other's equal.

you are a wombat .... seriously , a **** of epic proportions

you'd get a more intellectual conversation talking to a boiled egg

How's my new snazzy signature looking Topper me lad?

I'm not as happy with it as my last but it's still pretty good dont you think. Can you tell me whether you think it might be better if I add the ending of the quote also?

Regards,
King :D

It is possible to refine one's strength. That is different to natural strength. Yes, going to the gym is useless if you want to gain strength. You can only work with what God gives you.

Topper wrote:

It is possible to refine one's strength. That is different to natural strength. Yes, going to the gym is useless if you want to gain strength. You can only work with what God gives you.

so they're both naturally strong

if one does specific weight training & I'm talking huge work on the upper body & legs ..& the other does not

who is the stronger ?

Raiderdave wrote:

Topper wrote:

It is possible to refine one's strength. That is different to natural strength. Yes, going to the gym is useless if you want to gain strength. You can only work with what God gives you.

so they're both naturally strong

if one does specific weight training & I'm talking huge work on the upper body & legs ..& the other does not

who is the stronger ?

Raider you bleedin idiot! Didnt you read the mans post. They would both be exactly the same strength as they were no matter how much weight training one does. For f.ucks sake Raider. You need your comprehension sorted. I bet you're the type of fool who thinks weight lifters, body builders, rock climbers, hammer throwers, boxers, etc etc get stronger from going to the gym Raider

I like Toppers new explanation even better so my snazzy new signature will now be changed. :D

So now it's "gain = refine" as well as "article = letter", King-Eliagh? Are you human?

Where did I sy gain = refine topper? Please quote me

Ok here is gain and a bolded section just for you

gain1    /geɪn/ Show Spelled[geyn] Show IPA
verb (used with object)
1. to get (something desired), especially as a result of one's efforts: to gain possession of an object; to gain permission to enter a country.
2. to acquire as an increase or addition: to gain weight; to gain speed.
3. to obtain as a profit: He gained ten dollars by this deal.
4. to win; get in competition: to gain the prize.
5. to win (someone) to one's own side or point of view; persuade (sometimes followed by over ): to gain supporters.

Now read my signature/your quote again

Unfortunately Topper no matter how much I teach you, and anyone else teaches you for that matter, you will not gain intelligence. You can only work with what God has given you Topper me lad, which for you, sadly, has been diddly.

Oh this is too good, its dancin time! :D :D

You are imputing that refine = gain. This is not true at all and demonstrates yet again your poor comprehension, even with the definition of "gain" at your disposal.

Topper wrote:

You are imputing that refine = gain.

Another crappy statement. Again please quote/explain where I "imputed" refine = gain. All i've talked about is gain you silly peabrain. Read my signature a-GAIN!

King-Eliagh wrote:

As the pronunciation of NRL is ENarel, the article AN is appropriate.

That's probably the most bogan statement ever made.
Say hello to Narelle for me.

cos789 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

As the pronunciation of NRL is ENarel, the article AN is appropriate.

That's probably the most bogan statement ever made.
Say hello to Narelle for me.

The shocking truth of Australian people's knowledge of grammar. This time cos I'm not blaming you, its the failure of our education system. But I think you might do well to take heed of my learnings in the future. You obviously need some lessons and as per usual, I'm all too happy to dish them out to you my less educated fellow member

King-Eliagh wrote:

Topper wrote:

You are imputing that refine = gain.

Another crappy statement. Again please quote/explain where I "imputed" refine = gain. All i've talked about is gain you silly peabrain. Read my signature a-GAIN!

I said that you can refine strength. It was after this that you made the imputation by combining the two - by ignoring my refining statement.

Ahh, read my signature a-GAIN chumpo

Comprehend my statement about refinement again.

I never used the word refine, this is a term which you drummed up to divert the situation. I have no interest in it. You said what my signature says. I never confused any 'gain' with 'refinement'.

Read my signature once now and once before bed time and upon awakening each morning for the next few weeks. And please read it to your superior at the gym you're working at also.