Re: 3 Month Search FAILS to Find a Sponsor for Raiders
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:40 pm
If you want to edit anything, it will show, and did not, so he in effect called hackers. This behavior must be worthy of a ban?
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Beaussie wrote:Raider now that you're back, any updates on the Raiders sponsor search? Must be a real ongoing concern now after what... 4-5 months searching with no interest from the corporate community?
Let me guess, your imaginary friend in the Raiders front office told you so?Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Raider now that you're back, any updates on the Raiders sponsor search? Must be a real ongoing concern now after what... 4-5 months searching with no interest from the corporate community?
yes , lots of positive signs
will have something locked in before the seasons starts I am being told ..........
Yes, massive crowds attend each game!Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Raider now that you're back, any updates on the Raiders sponsor search? Must be a real ongoing concern now after what... 4-5 months searching with no interest from the corporate community?
yes , lots of positive signs
will have something locked in before the seasons starts I am being told ..........
strongest sporting brand in the capital .... was never a prob
Beaussie wrote:Let me guess, your imaginary friend in the Raiders front office told you so?Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Raider now that you're back, any updates on the Raiders sponsor search? Must be a real ongoing concern now after what... 4-5 months searching with no interest from the corporate community?
yes , lots of positive signs
will have something locked in before the seasons starts I am being told ..........![]()
![]()
Can't blame Channel 9 or the NRL. Have you ever seen the ratings for the Raiders when their games are broadcast. Disaster.Xman wrote:No wonder no one wants to sponsor the raiders! They never even get a chance to be shown on FTA. Ch9 and the NRL know that if they don't show the Bronco's 80% of the time their ratings will diminish to embarrassing levels, and just before a new TV deal is negotiated too!
Exactly. Their a basket case and TV poison. Ch9 and the NRL can't afford to give them more exposure and they won't get a decent sponsor until they do. Catch 22 that one.Beaussie wrote:Can't blame Channel 9 or the NRL. Have you ever seen the ratings for the Raiders when their games are broadcast. Disaster.Xman wrote:No wonder no one wants to sponsor the raiders! They never even get a chance to be shown on FTA. Ch9 and the NRL know that if they don't show the Bronco's 80% of the time their ratings will diminish to embarrassing levels, and just before a new TV deal is negotiated too!
Beaussie wrote:Can't blame Channel 9 or the NRL. Have you ever seen the ratings for the Raiders when their games are broadcast. Disaster.Xman wrote:No wonder no one wants to sponsor the raiders! They never even get a chance to be shown on FTA. Ch9 and the NRL know that if they don't show the Bronco's 80% of the time their ratings will diminish to embarrassing levels, and just before a new TV deal is negotiated too!
Xman wrote:Exactly. Their a basket case and TV poison. Ch9 and the NRL can't afford to give them more exposure and they won't get a decent sponsor until they do. Catch 22 that one.Beaussie wrote:Can't blame Channel 9 or the NRL. Have you ever seen the ratings for the Raiders when their games are broadcast. Disaster.Xman wrote:No wonder no one wants to sponsor the raiders! They never even get a chance to be shown on FTA. Ch9 and the NRL know that if they don't show the Bronco's 80% of the time their ratings will diminish to embarrassing levels, and just before a new TV deal is negotiated too!
Hang on, 500k for the 7 million who live in the RL heartlands of Sydney, Brisbane and the GC?Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:Can't blame Channel 9 or the NRL. Have you ever seen the ratings for the Raiders when their games are broadcast. Disaster.Xman wrote:No wonder no one wants to sponsor the raiders! They never even get a chance to be shown on FTA. Ch9 and the NRL know that if they don't show the Bronco's 80% of the time their ratings will diminish to embarrassing levels, and just before a new TV deal is negotiated too!
ova half a million in just in Sydney & Brisbane
a million nationally for their rnd 12 game V the Bulldogs
tidy numbers
& considerably more then a lot of Swans games
but of course you couldn't blame Ch 7 or 10 for telecasting the Swans could you
they're forced to ....
The suns and lions rated about 100k in brisbane for most games this year despite being broadcast against the same game or another on payTV. This compares very well against most nRL games in Brisbane which rate in the mid to low 200's and are NOT broadcast against another RL game. Also impressive when you consider the lions and suns are cellar dwellers currently.Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Exactly. Their a basket case and TV poison. Ch9 and the NRL can't afford to give them more exposure and they won't get a decent sponsor until they do. Catch 22 that one.Beaussie wrote:Can't blame Channel 9 or the NRL. Have you ever seen the ratings for the Raiders when their games are broadcast. Disaster.
poision
hmmmmm![]()
gee I wonder what the Lions.... Thuns . & Swans are then![]()
![]()
![]()