Page 5 of 852
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:39 pm
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:the NRL Grand Final in 2006 was a ratings monster beating the AFL one quite comfortably
Hahaha, you're hilarious, especially when you're being serious. See the following from the list of top shows since 2001 that I know you hate looking at. Ratings monster = AFL Grand Final
The Tribal Mind: The TV shows Australia loved
This contains charts of the most watched programs of the 20th and 21st centuries, prepared by David Dale for The Sydney Morning Herald and based on data from OzTAM and ACNielsen. Last updated May 31, 2010.
The top shows since 2001
AFL Grand Final 2006 (10) 3.15m
NRL grand final 2006 (9) 2.56m
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:42 pm
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:the NRL Grand Final in 2006 was a ratings monster beating the AFL one quite comfortably
Hahaha, you're hilarious, especially when you're being serious. See the following from the list of top shows since 2001 that I know you hate looking at. Ratings monster = AFL Grand Final
The Tribal Mind: The TV shows Australia loved
This contains charts of the most watched programs of the 20th and 21st centuries, prepared by David Dale for The Sydney Morning Herald and based on data from OzTAM and ACNielsen. Last updated May 31, 2010.
The top shows since 2001
AFL Grand Final 2006 (10) 3.15m
NRL grand final 2006 (9) 2.56m
& the regionals ... where are the regionals
we ran you down
saw you off
whopped you good .. when all Australians were counted , not just those that live in the capitals
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:45 pm
by Beaussie
FFS, how fucking stupid are you? ACNielsen compiles regional ratings and was included in the count listed and linked too previously. My god.
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:19 pm
by TLPG
And again, Raider, sourced evidence to prove your point - or be quiet.
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:25 pm
by Beaussie
The evidence has been posted here numerous times today. Raider has nothing now. Notice he has gone into hiding.
Oh and how about those massive viewer numbers for Friday Night AFL last night and last week. :P
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:19 pm
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:FFS, how ******* stupid are you? ACNielsen compiles regional ratings and was included in the count listed and linked too previously. My god. ](*,)
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:49 pm
by pussycat
pussycat wrote:Beaussie wrote:
AFL Grand Final 2006 (10) 3.15m
NRL grand final 2006 (9) 2.56m
raider wrote:& the regionals ... where are the regionals
Beaussie wrote:FFS, how ******* stupid are you? ACNielsen compiles regional ratings and was included in the count listed and linked too previously. My god.
Monday, 2 October 2006
Media briefs and TV ratings
- Melbourne tunes in for NRL decider, Sydney over the Swans. Even though the AFL Grand Final attracted a larger national audience on Saturday afternoon than last night’s NRL Grand Final, the Rugby League would probably be happier about the result than the AFL. Melbourne audiences were more responsive to its NRL team than Sydney was to its AFL team, a turnaround on the situation in recent years. In fact Melbourne had the biggest audience for both Grand Finals, the first time that has happened. Considerably more people in Melbourne watched the Storm play and lose last night (903,000) than the audience in in Sydney to watch the Swans play and lose on Saturday (762,000).
The NRL Grand Final averaged 2.561 million, well short of the 3.15 million average for the AFL (both figures refer to audiences in the five metro markets).But a look at the make up of those figures shows that Sydney has gone off the AFL but Melbourne was definitely on song for the League due to the presence of the Storm in the Grand Final — it was a record audience for an NRL game in Melbourne and it easily out-ranked Sydney where only 804,000 tuned in (sort of understandable given the lack of a Sydney team). The NRL decider also had a huge 788,000 viewers in Brisbane, which will make the NRL very happy. The AFL had big audiences in both Brisbane (328,000) and Adelaide (325,000), but the big worry for the AFL was that sharp fall in the size of the Sydney audience — a decline of around 25 per cent compared to 2005 when 994,000 watched on average. Perth figures showed a record audience there: the average was 549,000 viewers. And in Melbourne the 1.18 million audience was off slightly from last year when more than 1.2 million people tuned in for the game.
The regional figures for both games will be officially released tomorrow. — Glenn Dyer[/size]
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 8:12 pm
by Beaussie
pussycat wrote:Beaussie wrote:
AFL Grand Final 2006 (10) 3.15m
NRL grand final 2006 (9) 2.56m
raider wrote:& the regionals ... where are the regionals
Beaussie wrote:FFS, how ******* stupid are you? ACNielsen compiles regional ratings and was included in the count listed and linked too previously. My god.
Monday, 2 October 2006
Media briefs and TV ratings
- Melbourne tunes in for NRL decider, Sydney over the Swans. Even though the AFL Grand Final attracted a larger national audience on Saturday afternoon than last night’s NRL Grand Final, the Rugby League would probably be happier about the result than the AFL. Melbourne audiences were more responsive to its NRL team than Sydney was to its AFL team, a turnaround on the situation in recent years. In fact Melbourne had the biggest audience for both Grand Finals, the first time that has happened. Considerably more people in Melbourne watched the Storm play and lose last night (903,000) than the audience in in Sydney to watch the Swans play and lose on Saturday (762,000).
The NRL Grand Final averaged 2.561 million, well short of the 3.15 million average for the AFL (both figures refer to audiences in the five metro markets).But a look at the make up of those figures shows that Sydney has gone off the AFL but Melbourne was definitely on song for the League due to the presence of the Storm in the Grand Final — it was a record audience for an NRL game in Melbourne and it easily out-ranked Sydney where only 804,000 tuned in (sort of understandable given the lack of a Sydney team). The NRL decider also had a huge 788,000 viewers in Brisbane, which will make the NRL very happy. The AFL had big audiences in both Brisbane (328,000) and Adelaide (325,000), but the big worry for the AFL was that sharp fall in the size of the Sydney audience — a decline of around 25 per cent compared to 2005 when 994,000 watched on average. Perth figures showed a record audience there: the average was 549,000 viewers. And in Melbourne the 1.18 million audience was off slightly from last year when more than 1.2 million people tuned in for the game. The regional figures for both games will be officially released tomorrow. — Glenn Dyer[/size]
Who the hell is Glenn Dyer. I'll stick with a reputable source from the Sydney Morning Herald thanks.
BTW, did Glenn or yourself ever find these mysterious regional ratings that apparently the SMH didn't include?
Oh and where did that little rascal Raider go?
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 9:08 pm
by TLPG
Glenn must have gone with RegionalTam, Beau. What does that tell you?
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:01 pm
by pussycat
Beaussie wrote:
Who the hell is Glenn Dyer. I'll stick with a reputable source from the Sydney Morning Herald thanks.
Does it matter who he is? Just some journo who gave the rating figures for both Grand Finals back in 2006.
AFL-315m,
NRL-2561 And, as you can see makes it quiet clear these figures were for the five capital cities only. In your opening post you quote these same figures but claim they are a mixture of metro and regional figures.....When raiderdave queations you:
raider wrote:& the regionals ... where are the regionals
Here is your response:-
Beaussie wrote:FFS, how ******* stupid are you? ACNielsen compiles regional ratings and was included in the count listed and linked too previously. My god.
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:12 pm
by TLPG
Dyer CLAIMED that it was metro only. He is not a reliable source. That's what matters. He is wrong - it was both as proven by Beau's link.
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:38 pm
by pussycat
TLPG wrote:Dyer CLAIMED that it was metro only. He is not a reliable source. That's what matters. He is wrong - it was both as proven by Beau's link.
He writes for a magazine called - Media briefs and TV ratings
Did you notice at the bottom of his article it says :-
The regional figures for both games will be officially released tomorrow.
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 9:05 am
by Beaussie
So again, has he or you provided these so called regional ratings?
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 9:39 am
by TLPG
Including SA, WA, NT and Tasmania?
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:01 am
by Raiderdave
TLPG wrote:Including SA, WA, NT and Tasmania?
for regional figures for the above
SA.. see Adelaide metro, nearly all counted there
WA .. see Perth metro . nearly all counted there
TAS .. see regionaltam .. & just add them on
job done & an accurate figure is what we have