Page 5 of 14
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:57 pm
by Raiderdave
Onions wrote:Leave that out of the equation! You need it to pay your bills! The AFL doesn't!
yeah
not yet ... but if they don't get something else other then this snore inducing comp they have .. & soon
they will
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:58 pm
by Onions
Nope! Never! Don't need it and never will need it, because the AFL is a stronger comp and you just refuse to see it!!
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:12 pm
by Raiderdave
Onions wrote:Nope! Never! Don't need it and never will need it, because the AFL is a stronger comp and you just refuse to see it!!
nope
never
nuh
narrrrh
not
won't
can't
wouldn't
shant
gee
who are you trying to convince
me .... or yourself
:_<>
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:11 pm
by Onions
You, on your terms so that you can understand.
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:19 pm
by Raiderdave
Onions wrote:You, on your terms so that you can understand.
on my terms
you'd need to attend Oxford Yale & Cambridge universities .. simultaneously.... & leave a rhodes scholar .. to make up half the distance in intelligence between you .. down there .. & me .. up here
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:46 pm
by AFL Warrior
Name an NRL Rhodes Shcolar?
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:17 pm
by Beaussie
TLPG wrote:Not one of them individually beat the AFL grand final in live attendance. Fact.
Or tv ratings. Fact
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 8:43 am
by Raiderdave
AFL Warrior wrote:Name an NRL Rhodes Shcolar?
its Scholar
so you're not one , you can't even spell
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 8:55 am
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:TLPG wrote:Not one of them individually beat the AFL grand final in live attendance. Fact.
Or tv ratings. Fact
oh Really
3.8 Million veiwers ... I think that will cover the AFL grand final
blind folded , with one hand behind its back
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:27 am
by TLPG
Roy Morgan research on the TV ratings page on this site says otherwise, Raider.
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:35 am
by Raiderdave
TLPG wrote:Roy Morgan research on the TV ratings page on this site says otherwise, Raider.
does it
I didn't know the AFL Grand Final had been played already ?
which boggerball team won ?
was there another stupid replay .. afterall we need a laugh up here & you blokes provide us with plenty
oh & .... there isn't one game on this site that has rated higher then 3.8 Million
just so you know
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:39 am
by TLPG
Roy Morgan research puts AFL support at more than 6 million. Prove that wrong, Raider, with sources.
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:05 pm
by Beaussie
Raiderdave wrote:Beaussie wrote:TLPG wrote:Not one of them individually beat the AFL grand final in live attendance. Fact.
Or tv ratings. Fact
oh Really
3.8 Million veiwers ... I think that will cover the AFL grand final
blind folded , with one hand behind its back
Where are you getting 3.8 million from?
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:12 pm
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
oh Really
3.8 Million veiwers ... I think that will cover the AFL grand final
blind folded , with one hand behind its back
Where are you getting 3.8 million from?
3.75 Mill ?
from Ratings gathering sites & about 100 articles sprouting the ratings triumph SOO III was
have a look for yourself
won't be headed by anything in 2011
not even our GF
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 6:17 pm
by TLPG
SOO ratings totalled over 2 million, not 3 million.
Besides, you were talking about grand final, not SOO.