Talking Footy

eelofwest wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

b]AFL[/b]

Fri TV #AFLfinals @NorthKangaroos v @GeelongCats Seven 768k (Mel 591k Ade 177k) 7mate 233k (Syd 46k Bri 35k Per 152k)
Fri STV #AFLfinals @NorthKangaroos v @GeelongCats #FoxFooty 382k
Regionals: 169
Total: 1552 (Tas/WA still to come)

Sat TV #AFLfinals Seven 727k (Mel 482k Ade 245k) 7mate 275k (Syd 34k Bri 28k Per 213k)
Sat STV #AFLfinals 401k #FoxFooty
Regionals: 116
Total 1519 (Tas/WA still to come)

NRL

Fri TV #NRL QF1 @SSFCRABBITOHS v @SeaEagles Nine 792k (Syd 527k Bri 265k) GEM 77k (Mel 58k Ade 6k Per 14k) 434 reg NZ 49 Total 1353
Sat TV #NRLfinals Nine QF2 717k (Syd 488k Bri 229k) GEM 63k (Mel 40k Ade 4k Per 19k) 530 reg NZ 30 total 1410
Sat TV #NRLfinals Nine EF1 696k (Syd 359k Bri 377k) GEM 51k (Mel 40k Ade 3k Per 8k) 561 reg 47 NZ total 1395
Sun TV #NRLfinals Nine 738k (Syd 398k Mel 114k Bri 226k) GEM 7k (Ade 2k Per 7k) reg next (est 456) week 50 NZ est total 1253

Wookie you have made some errors here and you are not comparing apples with apples...............lets compare to last week since the NRL is a week behind in our finals.

Week 1
Fri TV #NRL QF1 @SSFCRABBITOHS v @SeaEagles Nine 792k (Syd 527k Bri 265k) GEM 77k (Mel 58k Ade 6k Per 14k) 530reg NZ 49 Total 1448
Sat TV #NRLfinals Nine QF2 717k (Syd 488k Bri 229k) GEM 63k (Mel 40k Ade 4k Per 19k) 434 reg NZ 30 total 1244m
Sat TV #NRLfinals Nine EF1 696k (Syd 359k Bri 377k) GEM 51k (Mel 40k Ade 3k Per 8k) 561 reg 47 NZ total 1395m
Sun TV #NRLfinals Nine 738k (Syd 398k Mel 114k Bri 226k) GEM 9k (Ade 2k Per 7k) reg next (est 500) week 50 NZ est total 1297m
Week 1
Fri TV #AFL #AFLFinals Seven 699k (Mel 539k Ade 160k) 7mate 190k (Syd 43k Bri 27k Per 121k) +regionals 148k+ Fox 327 = 1364m
Sat TV #AFLfinals arvo Seven 712k (Syd 147k Mel 236k Bri 52k Ade 69k Per 209k) + regionals 160k + Fox 318k = 1190m
Sat TV #AFLFinals night Seven 654k (Mel 532k Ade 122k) 7mate 202k (Syd 41k Bri 38k Per 123k) + (regionals Est 160) + Fox 299k = 1315m
Sun TV #AFLfinals Seven Port v Tigers 673k (Mel 388 Ade 193k Per 92k) 7mate 70k (Syd 45k Bri 25k) + (regionals est 150k) + Fox 329k = 1222m

THE NRL like for like is KING...... and even with 2 mediums of broadcasts you still loose...=D> =D> =D> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.

But but but
Exactly what were swines up against when they attracted about the same numbers for their final on the main channel In sydney

The only difference is that the swines have had 30 years of prime time exposure in sydney ... to the storms 2 years In melbourne

& the storm already pull similar numbers :_<>


If the storms numbers are poor
The swines are a dead set fucking joke

Simular numbers? Wow..

The swans had over 143k in sydney and that isn't counting the 60k+ from fox footy.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
60K from fox footy

try 12K you dribbling ******

30 years of being jammed down sydneysiders throats
& the Storm have need just 2 years to all but catch these over rated wankers .. aka .. the swines ratings in Melbourne

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.

But but but
Exactly what were swines up against when they attracted about the same numbers for their final on the main channel In sydney

The only difference is that the swines have had 30 years of prime time exposure in sydney ... to the storms 2 years In melbourne

& the storm already pull similar numbers :_<>


If the storms numbers are poor
The swines are a dead set fucking joke

Simular numbers? Wow..

The swans had over 143k in sydney and that isn't counting the 60k+ from fox footy.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
60K from fox footy

try 12K you dribbling ******

30 years of being jammed down sydneysiders throats
& the Storm have need just 2 years to all but catch these over rated wankers .. aka .. the swines ratings in Melbourne

318 thousand fox footy viewers.

Only 236k melbournites watched the game on free to air, so let's say 100k

Where the fuck do you think the other figures came from? Brisbane? rated 52k (free to air), or adelaide? rated 69k (Free to air)
202 thousand perthians watched the game on free to air and even if you say another 100 thousand watched that game on fox footy, you'll still have 118k to split between adelaide, brisbane and sydney


Plus, sydney has the biggest pay tv subscription rate, so, if you think 12k is actually watching that means you think more adelaide people were watching that game on fox footy than on free to air, even though that's never happened

Once again, i have made you look like a moron

Have a nice night virgin

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.

But but but
Exactly what were swines up against when they attracted about the same numbers for their final on the main channel In sydney

The only difference is that the swines have had 30 years of prime time exposure in sydney ... to the storms 2 years In melbourne

& the storm already pull similar numbers :_<>


If the storms numbers are poor
The swines are a dead set fucking joke

Simular numbers? Wow..

The swans had over 143k in sydney and that isn't counting the 60k+ from fox footy.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
60K from fox footy

try 12K you dribbling ******

30 years of being jammed down sydneysiders throats
& the Storm have need just 2 years to all but catch these over rated wankers .. aka .. the swines ratings in Melbourne

318 thousand fox footy viewers.

Only 236k melbournites watched the game on free to air, so let's say 100k

Where the fuck do you think the other figures came from? Brisbane? rated 52k (free to air), or adelaide? rated 69k (Free to air)
202 thousand perthians watched the game on free to air and even if you say another 100 thousand watched that game on fox footy, you'll still have 118k to split between adelaide, brisbane and sydney


Plus, sydney has the biggest pay tv subscription rate, so, if you think 12k is actually watching that means you think more adelaide people were watching that game on fox footy than on free to air, even though that's never happened

Once again, i have made you look like a moron

Have a nice night virgin

sydneysiders have no time for that victardian crap fucktard :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
there'd of been more watching in Shepparton then Sydney you deluded ******

let go of yr willy son
give it a rest for just one day

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.

But but but
Exactly what were swines up against when they attracted about the same numbers for their final on the main channel In sydney

The only difference is that the swines have had 30 years of prime time exposure in sydney ... to the storms 2 years In melbourne

& the storm already pull similar numbers :_<>


If the storms numbers are poor
The swines are a dead set fucking joke

Simular numbers? Wow..

The swans had over 143k in sydney and that isn't counting the 60k+ from fox footy.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
60K from fox footy

try 12K you dribbling ******

30 years of being jammed down sydneysiders throats
& the Storm have need just 2 years to all but catch these over rated wankers .. aka .. the swines ratings in Melbourne

318 thousand fox footy viewers.

Only 236k melbournites watched the game on free to air, so let's say 100k

Where the fuck do you think the other figures came from? Brisbane? rated 52k (free to air), or adelaide? rated 69k (Free to air)
202 thousand perthians watched the game on free to air and even if you say another 100 thousand watched that game on fox footy, you'll still have 118k to split between adelaide, brisbane and sydney


Plus, sydney has the biggest pay tv subscription rate, so, if you think 12k is actually watching that means you think more adelaide people were watching that game on fox footy than on free to air, even though that's never happened

Once again, i have made you look like a moron

Have a nice night virgin

sydneysiders have no time for that victardian crap fucktard :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
there'd of been more watching in Shepparton then Sydney you deluded ******

let go of yr willy son
give it a rest for just one day

Really.. Are you saying 147 thousand people in shepparton were watching the game? :

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

QueenslandISAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.

But but but
Exactly what were swines up against when they attracted about the same numbers for their final on the main channel In sydney

The only difference is that the swines have had 30 years of prime time exposure in sydney ... to the storms 2 years In melbourne

& the storm already pull similar numbers :_<>


If the storms numbers are poor
The swines are a dead set fucking joke

Simular numbers? Wow..

The swans had over 143k in sydney and that isn't counting the 60k+ from fox footy.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
60K from fox footy

try 12K you dribbling ******

30 years of being jammed down sydneysiders throats
& the Storm have need just 2 years to all but catch these over rated wankers .. aka .. the swines ratings in Melbourne

318 thousand fox footy viewers.

Only 236k melbournites watched the game on free to air, so let's say 100k

Where the fuck do you think the other figures came from? Brisbane? rated 52k (free to air), or adelaide? rated 69k (Free to air)
202 thousand perthians watched the game on free to air and even if you say another 100 thousand watched that game on fox footy, you'll still have 118k to split between adelaide, brisbane and sydney


Plus, sydney has the biggest pay tv subscription rate, so, if you think 12k is actually watching that means you think more adelaide people were watching that game on fox footy than on free to air, even though that's never happened

Once again, i have made you look like a moron

Have a nice night virgin

sydneysiders have no time for that victardian crap fucktard :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
there'd of been more watching in Shepparton then Sydney you deluded ******

let go of yr willy son
give it a rest for just one day

Really.. Are you saying 147 thousand people in shepparton were watching the game? :

on foxtel not FTA you ******** gimp

fuckin ell
just when you think fumblers couldn't get any dumber
they amaze you

The_Wookie wrote:

more than comparing Origin to regular matches? Fuck off.

The_Wookie wrote:

Well actually no. The AFL finals were up against the final round of NRL matches, half the NRL finals in week 1 were clear of any professional football - this is reflected in the ratings for saturday and sunday afternoon.

The_Wookie wrote:

Well actually no. The AFL finals were up against the final round of NRL matches, half the NRL finals in week 1 were clear of any professional football - this is reflected in the ratings for saturday and sunday afternoon.