Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 6:58 pm
So 1.68 million for Friday night average and 1.7 million for Saturday night for the AFL. Not to bad.
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
i never said they were TV viewers you rampant moron! they were an extra 50k watching the game who would have been counted as TV viewers if they stayed at home. how hard is that to comprehend!?AFLcrap1 wrote:Already showed it .
So let me break it down for the rampantly stupid.ours rated 1.5m too, and from Australia only. add the extra 50k at the game of course too.
It rated 1.5 mill.
You then say ADD the 50K of course Too.
So you want to ADD the 50 K to the 1.5 mill
.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Beep beep.
Are you really that stupid.NlolRL wrote:i never said they were TV viewers you rampant moron! they were an extra 50k watching the game who would have been counted as TV viewers if they stayed at home. how hard is that to comprehend!?AFLcrap1 wrote:Already showed it .
So let me break it down for the rampantly stupid.ours rated 1.5m too, and from Australia only. add the extra 50k at the game of course too.
It rated 1.5 mill.
You then say ADD the 50K of course Too.
So you want to ADD the 50 K to the 1.5 mill
.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Beep beep.
Plain as day .ours rated 1.5m too, and from Australia only. add the extra 50k at the game of course too
old spazza is having a moment again.AFLcrap1 wrote:Are you really that stupid.NlolRL wrote:i never said they were TV viewers you rampant moron! they were an extra 50k watching the game who would have been counted as TV viewers if they stayed at home. how hard is that to comprehend!?AFLcrap1 wrote:Already showed it .
So let me break it down for the rampantly stupid.ours rated 1.5m too, and from Australia only. add the extra 50k at the game of course too.
It rated 1.5 mill.
You then say ADD the 50K of course Too.
So you want to ADD the 50 K to the 1.5 mill
.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Beep beep.
Read what you posted.
Plain as day .ours rated 1.5m too, and from Australia only. add the extra 50k at the game of course too
Beep beep. moron.
But but butThe_Wookie wrote:No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.
Poor old NLOLRL.leagueiscrap wrote:old spazza is having a moment again.AFLcrap1 wrote:Are you really that stupid.NlolRL wrote:i never said they were TV viewers you rampant moron! they were an extra 50k watching the game who would have been counted as TV viewers if they stayed at home. how hard is that to comprehend!?AFLcrap1 wrote:Already showed it .
So let me break it down for the rampantly stupid.ours rated 1.5m too, and from Australia only. add the extra 50k at the game of course too.
It rated 1.5 mill.
You then say ADD the 50K of course Too.
So you want to ADD the 50 K to the 1.5 mill
.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Beep beep.
Read what you posted.
Plain as day .ours rated 1.5m too, and from Australia only. add the extra 50k at the game of course too
Beep beep. moron.
Simular numbers? Wow..Raiderdave wrote:But but butThe_Wookie wrote:No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.
Exactly what were swines up against when they attracted about the same numbers for their final on the main channel In sydney
The only difference is that the swines have had 30 years of prime time exposure in sydney ... to the storms 2 years In melbourne
& the storm already pull similar numbers:_<>
If the storms numbers are poor
The swines are a dead set fucking joke![]()
Wookie AFL on FTA on saturday has free rain......................imagine if there was NRL fta on saturday...................your logic stinks.... :_<> :_<>The_Wookie wrote:No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.
The_Wookie wrote:b]AFL[/b]
Fri TV #AFLfinals @NorthKangaroos v @GeelongCats Seven 768k (Mel 591k Ade 177k) 7mate 233k (Syd 46k Bri 35k Per 152k)
Fri STV #AFLfinals @NorthKangaroos v @GeelongCats #FoxFooty 382k
Regionals: 169
Total: 1552 (Tas/WA still to come)
Sat TV #AFLfinals Seven 727k (Mel 482k Ade 245k) 7mate 275k (Syd 34k Bri 28k Per 213k)
Sat STV #AFLfinals 401k #FoxFooty
Regionals: 116
Total 1519 (Tas/WA still to come)
NRL
Fri TV #NRL QF1 @SSFCRABBITOHS v @SeaEagles Nine 792k (Syd 527k Bri 265k) GEM 77k (Mel 58k Ade 6k Per 14k) 434 reg NZ 49 Total 1353
Sat TV #NRLfinals Nine QF2 717k (Syd 488k Bri 229k) GEM 63k (Mel 40k Ade 4k Per 19k) 530 reg NZ 30 total 1410
Sat TV #NRLfinals Nine EF1 696k (Syd 359k Bri 377k) GEM 51k (Mel 40k Ade 3k Per 8k) 561 reg 47 NZ total 1395
Sun TV #NRLfinals Nine 738k (Syd 398k Mel 114k Bri 226k) GEM 7k (Ade 2k Per 7k) reg next (est 456) week 50 NZ est total 1253
QueenslandISAFL wrote:Simular numbers? Wow..Raiderdave wrote:But but butThe_Wookie wrote:No AFL on the Sunday at all. Up against the VFL (which rated a season high 82) AND on the main channel, not GEM. You'd want to be doing better than normal.
Exactly what were swines up against when they attracted about the same numbers for their final on the main channel In sydney
The only difference is that the swines have had 30 years of prime time exposure in sydney ... to the storms 2 years In melbourne
& the storm already pull similar numbers:_<>
If the storms numbers are poor
The swines are a dead set fucking joke![]()
The swans had over 143k in sydney and that isn't counting the 60k+ from fox footy.