Talking Footy

pussycat wrote:

You seem to conveniently forget that 2/3 of our matches are shown on delay, some arent shown to after 10'oclock on two hour delay a much geater Cross to bear than your overlapping matches excuse that you whinge incessantly about.

Your complaining about the very nature of the game now! I cant help it that your game is long winded - drawn out and boring as hell


Both sides have there contacts and there problems associated with them But, your living in a dreamworld! the NRL ratings on PTV are better, on FTA are better - live with it.

A delayed telecast may reduce the audience by 30-40%, which only affects two of your games. All but one of our games is shown against another game which affectively halves the ratings for each game.

I'm not complaining about our game, I'm merely showing that both codes have disadvantages in the way they're scheduled. Yet you seem to think the only reason the NRL lost so badly is because they're hard done by.

pussycat wrote:

gem to come THURSDAY NIGHT NRL LIVE Network 9 760,000 510,000 0 249,000 0 0 Wow

Farkin ell...

40k on gem
500k in the regionals

1.3 million on a thursday

Another 1.1 million tonight with no sydney sides playing
The NRL .. flexing its muscles

Raiderdave wrote:

pussycat wrote:

gem to come THURSDAY NIGHT NRL LIVE Network 9 760,000 510,000 0 249,000 0 0 Wow

Farkin ell...

40k on gem
500k in the regionals

1.3 million on a thursday

Another 1.1 million tonight with no sydney sides playing
The NRL .. flexing its muscles

500k regionals, i think you are being modest.................this game easily past 1.3m.

pussycat wrote:

gem to come THURSDAY NIGHT NRL LIVE Network 9 760,000 510,000 0 249,000 0 0 Wow

Its does not matter what night you put NRL, if its Live it will rate its socks off plain and simple.

NRL coverage is inferior to AFL and the AFL still lags behind with 2 mediums FOX/7...................9 live on Fox 3 live on FTA 1 delay compared to NRL with 5Live Fox and 1 Live FTA 1 delayed till 11pm and the other delayed for 2 hours on a sunday arvo.

NRL with some many broadcasting options in the future its not funny.

Cheers

NRL 135-145 Live Broadcasts Fox/FTA 80m - SOO1,2,3, Test match 67m
AFL 270-280 Live broadcasts Fox/FTA 80m 207 games a year

NRL Ave 67m/145 = 462k per game Broadcast 1 round left also....
AFL ave 80m/280 = 285k per Broadcast
AFL ave 80m/207 games = 386k ave per game

The NRL will pull even further away as it improves the broadcasting arrangements in years to come. =D> =D>

Now the figures might not be 100% spot on but i think you understand what i am getting at.......NRL is king...

eelofwest wrote:

NRL 135-145 Live Broadcasts Fox/FTA 80m - SOO1,2,3, Test match 67m
AFL 270-280 Live broadcasts Fox/FTA 80m 207 games a year

NRL Ave 67m/145 = 462k per game Broadcast
AFL ave 80m/280 = 285k per Broadcast
AFL ave 80m/207 games = 386k ave per game

The NRL will pull even further away as it improves the broadcasting arrangements in years to come. =D> =D>

Now the figures might not be 100% spot on but i think you understand what i am getting at.......NRL is king...

Stop your BS. The AFL doesn't show every game into every market, nor are they shown in isolation. Fact is they are still only 208 games on TV with only about 100-120 games being available to each viewer because as has been said 100 times, you can't be counted watching two games at the same time.

Strong ratings for the NRL last night, must be one of their best. Not even close to Coll v ess in rnd 6 which got around 1.6m

Everything in their favour and still struggling, can't wait till the next round of media rights to be sold

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

You seem to conveniently forget that 2/3 of our matches are shown on delay, some arent shown to after 10'oclock on two hour delay a much geater Cross to bear than your overlapping matches excuse that you whinge incessantly about.

Your complaining about the very nature of the game now! I cant help it that your game is long winded - drawn out and boring as hell


Both sides have there contacts and there problems associated with them But, your living in a dreamworld! the NRL ratings on PTV are better, on FTA are better - live with it.

A delayed telecast may reduce the audience by 30-40%, which only affects two of your games. All but one of our games is shown against another game which affectively halves the ratings for each game.

I'm not complaining about our game, I'm merely showing that both codes have disadvantages in the way they're scheduled. Yet you seem to think the only reason the NRL lost so badly is because they're hard done by.

Our ratings for the Friday nigt delayed game are down 50-60% on the live game - Sunday, at least 30% on the live game. Certainly has considerably more affect than simulcasting has on your FTA matches plus you have near about 30 extra matches on FTA. So naturally, through sheer weight of possession your going to get more viewers at club level. But this is no achievement, and olny a very desperate - success starved person would consider it to be . Unlike achieving higher averages in both FTA and PTV.

Some pretty ordinary batsman have accumulated more runs than Bradman in there careers but they'll always live in the shadow of the man that averaged almost 100. .

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

You seem to conveniently forget that 2/3 of our matches are shown on delay, some arent shown to after 10'oclock on two hour delay a much geater Cross to bear than your overlapping matches excuse that you whinge incessantly about.

Your complaining about the very nature of the game now! I cant help it that your game is long winded - drawn out and boring as hell


Both sides have there contacts and there problems associated with them But, your living in a dreamworld! the NRL ratings on PTV are better, on FTA are better - live with it.

A delayed telecast may reduce the audience by 30-40%, which only affects two of your games. All but one of our games is shown against another game which affectively halves the ratings for each game.

I'm not complaining about our game, I'm merely showing that both codes have disadvantages in the way they're scheduled. Yet you seem to think the only reason the NRL lost so badly is because they're hard done by.

Our ratings for the Friday nigt delayed game are down 50-60% on the live game - Sunday, at least 30% on the live game. Certainly has considerably more affect than simulcasting has on your FTA matches plus you have near about 30 extra matches on FTA. So naturally, through sheer weight of possession your going to get more viewers at club level. But this is no achievement, and olny a very desperate - success starved person would consider it to be . Unlike achieving higher averages in both FTA and PTV.

Some pretty ordinary batsman have accumulated more runs than Bradman in there careers but they'll always live in the shadow of the man that averaged almost 100. .

your average FN games have rated 600-700 for metro FTA and your delayed about 300-400, so that's a reduction of 30-40% as I've said. Certainly nothing on 50%. Where as showing two games at the same time MUST cut your audience into two. There is no way with that arrangement that the AFL would ever win the highest average because multiple games per week just can't be watched by every AFL fan.

You only have to look at the highest FTA and foxtel ratings games for every year. This year the AFL will win both, as it did last year, and it will win the GF as it does almost every year.

So theAFl has the highest rating games and the highest accumulative ratings. It is the biggest game on TV

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

You seem to conveniently forget that 2/3 of our matches are shown on delay, some arent shown to after 10'oclock on two hour delay a much geater Cross to bear than your overlapping matches excuse that you whinge incessantly about.

Your complaining about the very nature of the game now! I cant help it that your game is long winded - drawn out and boring as hell


Both sides have there contacts and there problems associated with them But, your living in a dreamworld! the NRL ratings on PTV are better, on FTA are better - live with it.

A delayed telecast may reduce the audience by 30-40%, which only affects two of your games. All but one of our games is shown against another game which affectively halves the ratings for each game.

I'm not complaining about our game, I'm merely showing that both codes have disadvantages in the way they're scheduled. Yet you seem to think the only reason the NRL lost so badly is because they're hard done by.

Our ratings for the Friday nigt delayed game are down 50-60% on the live game - Sunday, at least 30% on the live game. Certainly has considerably more affect than simulcasting has on your FTA matches plus you have near about 30 extra matches on FTA. So naturally, through sheer weight of possession your going to get more viewers at club level. But this is no achievement, and olny a very desperate - success starved person would consider it to be . Unlike achieving higher averages in both FTA and PTV.

Some pretty ordinary batsman have accumulated more runs than Bradman in there careers but they'll always live in the shadow of the man that averaged almost 100. .

your average FN games have rated 600-700 for metro FTA and your delayed about 300-400, so that's a reduction of 30-40% as I've said. Certainly nothing on 50%. Where as showing two games at the same time MUST cut your audience into two. There is no way with that arrangement that the AFL would ever win the highest average because multiple games per week just can't be watched by every AFL fan.

You only have to look at the highest FTA and foxtel ratings games for every year. This year the AFL will win both, as it did last year, and it will win the GF as it does almost every year.

So theAFl has the highest rating games and the highest accumulative ratings. It is the biggest game on TV

:_<> :_<> :_<>

tripe
from the first word
til the last

2 forms of coverage combined & yet they can barely beat the NRL with 1 form
more games
more on fta
more shown into more markets then then NRL

& their domestic comp scrapes in over the NRL by a few million in Australia
we add our reps
& sport v sport we win easily

we add our other veiwers in this region
& the NRL wins easily

no my bumbling little derpster
Rugby League is the biggest game on TV

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

You seem to conveniently forget that 2/3 of our matches are shown on delay, some arent shown to after 10'oclock on two hour delay a much geater Cross to bear than your overlapping matches excuse that you whinge incessantly about.

Your complaining about the very nature of the game now! I cant help it that your game is long winded - drawn out and boring as hell


Both sides have there contacts and there problems associated with them But, your living in a dreamworld! the NRL ratings on PTV are better, on FTA are better - live with it.

A delayed telecast may reduce the audience by 30-40%, which only affects two of your games. All but one of our games is shown against another game which affectively halves the ratings for each game.

I'm not complaining about our game, I'm merely showing that both codes have disadvantages in the way they're scheduled. Yet you seem to think the only reason the NRL lost so badly is because they're hard done by.

Our ratings for the Friday nigt delayed game are down 50-60% on the live game - Sunday, at least 30% on the live game. Certainly has considerably more affect than simulcasting has on your FTA matches plus you have near about 30 extra matches on FTA. So naturally, through sheer weight of possession your going to get more viewers at club level. But this is no achievement, and olny a very desperate - success starved person would consider it to be . Unlike achieving higher averages in both FTA and PTV.

Some pretty ordinary batsman have accumulated more runs than Bradman in there careers but they'll always live in the shadow of the man that averaged almost 100. .

your average FN games have rated 600-700 for metro FTA and your delayed about 300-400, so that's a reduction of 30-40% as I've said. Certainly nothing on 50%. Where as showing two games at the same time MUST cut your audience into two. There is no way with that arrangement that the AFL would ever win the highest average because multiple games per week just can't be watched by every AFL fan.

You only have to look at the highest FTA and foxtel ratings games for every year. This year the AFL will win both, as it did last year, and it will win the GF as it does almost every year.

So theAFl has the highest rating games and the highest accumulative ratings. It is the biggest game on TV

:_<> :_<> :_<>

tripe
from the first word
til the last

2 forms of coverage combined & yet they can barely beat the NRL with 1 form
more games
more on fta
more shown into more markets then then NRL

& their domestic comp scrapes in over the NRL by a few million in Australia
we add our reps
& sport v sport we win easily

we add our other veiwers in this region
& the NRL wins easily

no my bumbling little derpster
Rugby League is the biggest game on TV

yeah nah, wookies figures include rep games and nz and you're still well behind.

How does showing a game on FTA and fox help exactly? >

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

You seem to conveniently forget that 2/3 of our matches are shown on delay, some arent shown to after 10'oclock on two hour delay a much geater Cross to bear than your overlapping matches excuse that you whinge incessantly about.

Your complaining about the very nature of the game now! I cant help it that your game is long winded - drawn out and boring as hell


Both sides have there contacts and there problems associated with them But, your living in a dreamworld! the NRL ratings on PTV are better, on FTA are better - live with it.

A delayed telecast may reduce the audience by 30-40%, which only affects two of your games. All but one of our games is shown against another game which affectively halves the ratings for each game.

I'm not complaining about our game, I'm merely showing that both codes have disadvantages in the way they're scheduled. Yet you seem to think the only reason the NRL lost so badly is because they're hard done by.

Our ratings for the Friday nigt delayed game are down 50-60% on the live game - Sunday, at least 30% on the live game. Certainly has considerably more affect than simulcasting has on your FTA matches plus you have near about 30 extra matches on FTA. So naturally, through sheer weight of possession your going to get more viewers at club level. But this is no achievement, and olny a very desperate - success starved person would consider it to be . Unlike achieving higher averages in both FTA and PTV.

Some pretty ordinary batsman have accumulated more runs than Bradman in there careers but they'll always live in the shadow of the man that averaged almost 100. .

your average FN games have rated 600-700 for metro FTA and your delayed about 300-400, so that's a reduction of 30-40% as I've said. Certainly nothing on 50%. Where as showing two games at the same time MUST cut your audience into two. There is no way with that arrangement that the AFL would ever win the highest average because multiple games per week just can't be watched by every AFL fan.

You only have to look at the highest FTA and foxtel ratings games for every year. This year the AFL will win both, as it did last year, and it will win the GF as it does almost every year.

So theAFl has the highest rating games and the highest accumulative ratings. It is the biggest game on TV

:_<> :_<> :_<>

tripe
from the first word
til the last

2 forms of coverage combined & yet they can barely beat the NRL with 1 form
more games
more on fta
more shown into more markets then then NRL

& their domestic comp scrapes in over the NRL by a few million in Australia
we add our reps
& sport v sport we win easily

we add our other veiwers in this region
& the NRL wins easily

no my bumbling little derpster
Rugby League is the biggest game on TV

yeah nah, wookies figures include rep games and nz and you're still well behind.

:_<> :_<>
NRL Australian ratings total 114 Million approx
NZ ratings 15 Million approx
RL rep games 18 Million approx.

since when has the VFL rated over 147 Million you blithering cockheads ? :_<> :_<> :_<>

Got a source for these figures or did you count them on your fingers and toes?

NlolRL wrote:

Got a source for these figures or did you count them on your fingers and toes?

those very same figures have been posted with links on this thread 100 times
if you'd care to open your pasted on eyes & look dickhead