Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:10 am

& I asked for anyone
Ratings agency
Media .
Tv Stations
Anyone besides you

Yet nothing .
Fucking hypocrite .

well funny enough, you guys having been spouting a comparison of cumulative ratings for years without the above, so fuck right off yourself

Nope the yearly ratings are spot on ...not for you ..you can't accept al getting beaten
It's printed in the media .........backed up by the weekly ratings .

It's a simple maths equation to add them up then compare

So yes it's been printed in the media ..backed up by the official ratings numbers


So where's you backup ..for Fruitloop 1.5 theory .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:22 am

Nope the yearly ratings are spot on ...not for you ..you can't accept al getting beaten
It's printed in the media .........backed up by the weekly ratings .

It's a simple maths equation to add them up then compare

So yes it's been printed in the media ..backed up by the official ratings numbers


So where's you backup ..for Fruitloop 1.5 theory .

where have any of the TV networks or ratings agencies every ONCE compared cumulative ratings for 2 different programs. In fact I cant think of a single time they've even published cumulative figures.

You guys use them like they're gospel, yet funny enough no one else does. I wonder why?

22% increase in New Zealand for all 8 games per week is great news>

its a market which can only get bigger..

lets not forget that almost 700k watched the 2011 G.F in New Zealand.
515k on SKY SPORTS (CABLE) and 177k On delay on FTA.

NlolRL wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:27 am

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:22 am

Nope the yearly ratings are spot on ...not for you ..you can't accept al getting beaten
It's printed in the media .........backed up by the weekly ratings .

It's a simple maths equation to add them up then compare

So yes it's been printed in the media ..backed up by the official ratings numbers


So where's you backup ..for Fruitloop 1.5 theory .

where have any of the TV networks or ratings agencies every ONCE compared cumulative ratings for 2 different programs. In fact I cant think of a single time they've even published cumulative figures.

You guys use them like they're gospel, yet funny enough no one else does. I wonder why?

Avoiding the question again .

This ones done

NEXT .

Hold on there is no next
No other fumbler has come near this looney theory .

Can't blame them .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 11:16 am

NlolRL wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:27 am

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:22 am

Nope the yearly ratings are spot on ...not for you ..you can't accept al getting beaten
It's printed in the media .........backed up by the weekly ratings .

It's a simple maths equation to add them up then compare

So yes it's been printed in the media ..backed up by the official ratings numbers


So where's you backup ..for Fruitloop 1.5 theory .

where have any of the TV networks or ratings agencies every ONCE compared cumulative ratings for 2 different programs. In fact I cant think of a single time they've even published cumulative figures.

You guys use them like they're gospel, yet funny enough no one else does. I wonder why?

Avoiding the question again .

This ones done

NEXT .

Hold on there is no next
No other fumbler has come near this looney theory .

Can't blame them .

So you can use cumulative ratings despite no ratings agency, media outlet or TV network publishing them, let alone comparing them, yet I cant account for time of the programs?

H Y P O C R I T E

NlolRL wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:27 am

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:22 am

Nope the yearly ratings are spot on ...not for you ..you can't accept al getting beaten
It's printed in the media .........backed up by the weekly ratings .

It's a simple maths equation to add them up then compare

So yes it's been printed in the media ..backed up by the official ratings numbers


So where's you backup ..for Fruitloop 1.5 theory .

where have any of the TV networks or ratings agencies every ONCE compared cumulative ratings for 2 different programs. In fact I cant think of a single time they've even published cumulative figures.

You guys use them like they're gospel, yet funny enough no one else does. I wonder why?

Football games are programs. SMH and the Australian are media outlets. Oz Tam and Nielson are ratings agencies...........get help!

pussycat wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 11:26 am

NlolRL wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:27 am

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 10:22 am

Nope the yearly ratings are spot on ...not for you ..you can't accept al getting beaten
It's printed in the media .........backed up by the weekly ratings .

It's a simple maths equation to add them up then compare

So yes it's been printed in the media ..backed up by the official ratings numbers


So where's you backup ..for Fruitloop 1.5 theory .

where have any of the TV networks or ratings agencies every ONCE compared cumulative ratings for 2 different programs. In fact I cant think of a single time they've even published cumulative figures.

You guys use them like they're gospel, yet funny enough no one else does. I wonder why?

Football games are programs. SMH and the Australian are media outlets. Oz Tam and Nielson are ratings agencies...........get help!

Where have ratings agencies or TV networks released data? Where have they compared different programs?

I suggest you're the one who needs help to find these

How thick are you .
It's reported in the media that Rl wins the ratings for the year .....as per the official ratings .
A simple add up job

So where's the media backing your nutjob theory

No where .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 12:36 pm

How thick are you .
It's reported in the media that Rl wins the ratings for the year .....as per the official ratings .
A simple add up job

So where's the media backing your nutjob theory

No where .

yeah funny that the NRL would calculate the ratings and announce victory

The point is why arent these cumulative ratings and comparisons released by independant sources with no vested interest? Why dont the TV networks spout their products value compared to their opposition using such reports.

I'll tell you why: because cumulative figures are a crock of shit unless the conditions you are comparing are absolutely identical ie, same time of length, same time of telecast etc etc

The nrl didn't calculate them .
What is wrong with your brain

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed May 23, 2018 1:01 pm

The nrl didn't calculate them .
What is wrong with your brain

that's like saying the AFL dont calculate their own Auskick figures when they are published in the media

Jesus h fuck
Unbelievable .
Ratings are done by independent agencies
All the media did was total them

Auskick numbers ..dodgy Auskick numbers are AFL houses figures .

Get help
You have totally lost the plot .

Lol.

Totaling them isnt the issue. Placing any value on the totals compared to other programs is the issue.

I think its you who doesnt get it

the AFL & NRL talk up the "cumulative figures" all the time>

by saying tv ratings are up 5% year on year etc..

Biggest year yet AFL claimed in 2017

CROWDS
SPONSORSHIP
MEDIA DEAL
GATE TAKINGS
TV RATINGS
ETC ETC