Talking Footy

Phelpsy wrote:

Does that include fox?

Add your Fox and Piss small regionals and you still loose and you know it all to well.....

Phelpsy wrote:

Who has the highest average viewers per game ? Who has the biggest TV rights deal?

Per game, it's the NRL, can't you read?

Parramatta on TV rate better than all the AFL teams, fact.

Hellava smashing lat night.

The_Wookie wrote:

yep. No question it was a towelling.

But but but but ,Queensland is AFL told me the AFL win EVERY WEEK.

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Whats this talk i hear of Fridays only rate for NRL........

Thu TV #NRL #NRLSOUBRI Nine 629k (Syd 395k Bri 234k) GEM 27k (Mel 17k Per 11k) 656k + regional's over 1m easy.

NRL rates more on FTA and Pay TV peroid. =D> =D> =D>

Theyre two completely different arrangements. Taking the FTA or PTv ratings only excludes some of the AFLs audience since they show all FTA games on PTv symmaltaneously

When you take the FULL audience into account the AFL win. No surprise you guys don't want to do that [-o<

win >
you lot haven't won anything in the last 5 years even with 198 simulcast on 2 forms of coverage for the last 3 years
you ****** :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Really?

You obviously ignore the ratings every Friday, Saturday and Sunday

:_<> :_<> :_<>
& you've obviously ignored that actual total ratings for each year for the last 5 you stupid *****

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

eelofwest wrote:

Whats this talk i hear of Fridays only rate for NRL........

Thu TV #NRL #NRLSOUBRI Nine 629k (Syd 395k Bri 234k) GEM 27k (Mel 17k Per 11k) 656k + regional's over 1m easy.

NRL rates more on FTA and Pay TV peroid. =D> =D> =D>

Theyre two completely different arrangements. Taking the FTA or PTv ratings only excludes some of the AFLs audience since they show all FTA games on PTv symmaltaneously

When you take the FULL audience into account the AFL win. No surprise you guys don't want to do that [-o<

win >
you lot haven't won anything in the last 5 years even with 198 simulcast on 2 forms of coverage for the last 3 years
you ****** :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Really?

You obviously ignore the ratings every Friday, Saturday and Sunday

:_<> :_<> :_<>
& you've obviously ignored that actual total ratings for each year for the last 5 you stupid *****

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/b ... 6719615473

Read it and weep derpman

We live in the real word, One Were all Australians are counted, not just the ones the AFL want to count. And yes, some of our figures were down last year as we tried different things - but still well above yours.

pussycat wrote:

We live in the real word, One Were all Australians are counted, not just the ones the AFL want to count. And yes, some of our figures were down last year as we tried different things - but still well above yours.

That's why this Independant article said the AFL is on top :_<>

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

We live in the real word, One Were all Australians are counted, not just the ones the AFL want to count. And yes, some of our figures were down last year as we tried different things - but still well above yours.

That's why this Independant article said the AFL is on top :_<>

Nowhere in that article does it say the AFL is on top or anything like that. What is it with you brainwashed mushrooms? Swans likes to pretend he served you like to Pretend the AFL are on top - delusional >

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

We live in the real word, One Were all Australians are counted, not just the ones the AFL want to count. And yes, some of our figures were down last year as we tried different things - but still well above yours.

That's why this Independant article said the AFL is on top :_<>

Nowhere in that article does it say the AFL is on top or anything like that. What is it with you brainwashed mushrooms? Swans likes to pretend he served you like to Pretend the AFL are on top - delusional >

Hmm, what does supreme mean? >

This is one of many articles showing the AFL win the overall ratings race

pussycat wrote:

We live in the real word, One Were all Australians are counted, not just the ones the AFL want to count. And yes, some of our figures were down last year as we tried different things - but still well above yours.

in the NRL fan's version of the real world.
ignore all stats and figures, how the NRL is behind the AFL in all areas
and keep trying to convince every one that the NRL is ahead
the NRL fans are far from the real world

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

We live in the real word, One Were all Australians are counted, not just the ones the AFL want to count. And yes, some of our figures were down last year as we tried different things - but still well above yours.

That's why this Independant article said the AFL is on top :_<>

Nowhere in that article does it say the AFL is on top or anything like that. What is it with you brainwashed mushrooms? Swans likes to pretend he served you like to Pretend the AFL are on top - delusional >

Hahaha what are you an RD wanna be??? You like to pretend the NRL is on top when in fact it ain't even in the race!!! Pussy don't care how many dole bludgers will sit and watch RL on FTA - because that's all you get people too tight to reach in their pocket and buy a membership or a ticket to a game hell or just a scarf!!!!! Bunch of free loaders NRL fans!!!!!!!!

That's why RL sells the most out of all the local codes and rates higher.

It doesn't rate higher. You can keep telling yourself it does if it gets you off but overall AFL has higher average rating per game then nrl.

AFL is by far and away bigger then nrl ....