Talking Footy

1 live AFL game: @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #AFL #AFLSwansDons Seven 448k (Mel 339k Ade 109k) 7mate 175k (Syd 69k

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Phelpsy wrote:

I think Wookie put this best... Origin does not reflect overall interest in rl. Just as the 100 metre final at the Olympics does not reflect overall interest in athletics. They are marquee events.

When AFL tried this how many did they get??????



























Less than most club games :<> :<> :<>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

1 live AFL game: @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #AFL #AFLSwansDons Seven 448k (Mel 339k Ade 109k) 7mate 175k (Syd 69k

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Plus foxtel, 90-100k on a secondary channel.

Didnt the live NRL only get 347k?

So 1 in 4.5 people watching sport in Sydney last night chose AFL over the NRL

Firstly I never questioned attendances , tha'ts another thread. Its near impossible to find records records going back that far, But we both know what happend - it was a failure, no one wanted to part of it no one cared. If it was successful the AFL would'nt of been so quick to dump it!

pussycat wrote:

Firstly I never questioned attendances , tha'ts another thread. Its near impossible to find records records going back that far, But we both know what happend - it was a failure, no one wanted to part of it no one cared. If it was successful the AFL would'nt of been so quick to dump it!

No, you have NFI what happened.

I think the AFL should have persevered. Surely it could'nt of been any worse than the crap they dish out on a weekly basis.

pussycat wrote:

I think the AFL should have persevered. Surely it could'nt of been any worse than the crap they dish out on a weekly basis.

What they dish out week in week out was preferred but the football community. Soo is a sideshow only. The fact that it is your sports pinnacle says everything

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

I think the AFL should have persevered. Surely it could'nt of been any worse than the crap they dish out on a weekly basis.

What they dish out week in week out was preferred but the football community. Soo is a sideshow only. The fact that it is your sports pinnacle says everything

Spoken like a true insular southerner.
Just because our sport has many facets seems to be a sore point with you poor folk.
We have a domestic comp .
A rep comp.
AN international comp.
& it eats you mob up.

Our apparent Gimmick/sideshow is bigger than anything in Fumbleworld.


How does it feel that a "GIMMICK " beats your biggest game.?

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

I think the AFL should have persevered. Surely it could'nt of been any worse than the crap they dish out on a weekly basis.

What they dish out week in week out was preferred but the football community. Soo is a sideshow only. The fact that it is your sports pinnacle says everything

Spoken like a true insular southerner.
Just because our sport has many facets seems to be a sore point with you poor folk.
We have a domestic comp .
A rep comp.
AN international comp.
& it eats you mob up.

Our apparent Gimmick/sideshow is bigger than anything in Fumbleworld.


How does it feel that a "GIMMICK " beats your biggest game.?

Its bigger on TV only, not necessarily overall, and even then the comparison isnt true given only one is in prime time.

All we here from you lot on here is SOO this, SOO that. When all else fails you repeatedly return to a 3 game series as your only hope

It would be like swimmers pointing to the Olympics and the ratings for swimming there lol.

Sat TV #AFL night Seven 328k (Mel 266k Ade 63k) 7mate 83k (Syd 18k Bri 21k Per 45k)

Sat TV #AFL arvo Seven 186k (Ade 101k Per 85k) 7mate Syd 17k

Wow look at those Sydney numbers!

pussycat wrote:

Sat TV #AFL night Seven 328k (Mel 266k Ade 63k) 7mate 83k (Syd 18k Bri 21k Per 45k)

Sat TV #AFL arvo Seven 186k (Ade 101k Per 85k) 7mate Syd 17k

Wow look at those Sydney numbers!

Add Foxtell and they're ok for non-swans games

Yes, i think a non Sydney game gets good ratings ... Particiarly when you add fox in.

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Sat TV #AFL night Seven 328k (Mel 266k Ade 63k) 7mate 83k (Syd 18k Bri 21k Per 45k)

Sat TV #AFL arvo Seven 186k (Ade 101k Per 85k) 7mate Syd 17k

Wow look at those Sydney numbers!

Add Foxtell and they're ok for non-swans games

the delusion
the outta control


delusion of fumblers

its hysterical



a clue
when will fumblers get one

if 18K people with 100% access to a form of coverage watch something
how many do you think will watch a game when only 33% have access

answer
not many

not many at all

the fumbles & derpies is a joke in Sydney
it never fails to embarrass itself there

The_Wookie wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Sat TV #AFL night Seven 328k (Mel 266k Ade 63k) 7mate 83k (Syd 18k Bri 21k Per 45k)

Sat TV #AFL arvo Seven 186k (Ade 101k Per 85k) 7mate Syd 17k

Wow look at those Sydney numbers!

No Sydney team at all featured on Saturday night, GWS is the arvo broadcast.

so

17K watched the Midgets then in Sydney ?

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


oh but


175K watched on pay in Sydney right ?

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>