Page 370 of 852

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:41 pm
by leagueiscrap
Organisation Description
OzTAM  Jointly owned and operated by commercial television networks Seven, Nine and Ten.
 Measures audiences across the five metropolitan capital cities: Sydney, Melbourne,
Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth.
 Utilises a panel of approximately 3,000 homes across measured markets.
 An “establishment survey” is performed on a continual basis throughout the year,
utilising telephone interviews to define the population to be represented in the panel.
 A “peoplemeter” is installed onto each household’s television/s which tracks the
usage of the set. Upon television usage, the peoplemeter asks the viewer which
member /s of the household are watching television to enable OzTAM/Regional TAM
to calculate demographic data of the viewership.

Regional TAM  A joint venture comprising of five commercial regional networks: NBN, Prime, Seven
Queensland, South Cross Broadcasting and WIN.
 Measures audiences across the five aggregated markets across the east coast of
Australia: Queensland, Northern NSW, Southern NSW, Victoria and Tasmania.
 Utilises a panel of approximately 2,000 homes across measured markets.
 An establishment survey and peoplemeters are utilised similarly to those discussed
above

page 37


:-k
so 5000 ratings boxes OZTAM use that represents 23 million Australians
and the bumsniffers pin their popularity of their game on that :(/ :(/ :(/
yet are decades behind in every other area when compared to the AFL :)))

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:18 am
by pussycat
leagueiscrap wrote:
Organisation Description
OzTAM  Jointly owned and operated by commercial television networks Seven, Nine and Ten.
 Measures audiences across the five metropolitan capital cities: Sydney, Melbourne,
Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth.
 Utilises a panel of approximately 3,000 homes across measured markets.
 An “establishment survey” is performed on a continual basis throughout the year,
utilising telephone interviews to define the population to be represented in the panel.
 A “peoplemeter” is installed onto each household’s television/s which tracks the
usage of the set. Upon television usage, the peoplemeter asks the viewer which
member /s of the household are watching television to enable OzTAM/Regional TAM
to calculate demographic data of the viewership.

Regional TAM  A joint venture comprising of five commercial regional networks: NBN, Prime, Seven
Queensland, South Cross Broadcasting and WIN.
 Measures audiences across the five aggregated markets across the east coast of
Australia: Queensland, Northern NSW, Southern NSW, Victoria and Tasmania.
 Utilises a panel of approximately 2,000 homes across measured markets.
 An establishment survey and peoplemeters are utilised similarly to those discussed
above

page 37
file:///C:/adam/tv%20ratings/AFL%20vs%20NRL%20rating%20report/02whole.pdf

:-k
so 5000 ratings boxes OZTAM use that represents 23 million Australians
and the bumsniffers pin their popularity of their game on that :(/ :(/ :(/
yet are decades behind in every other area when compared to the AFL :)))
Might not be 100% accurate but plenty of TV networks make billion dollar decision based on its results and have done foryears.

Seems strange your only now questioning it results . Where your questioning there results a few years back?

Did you read the section that said how tv is much more important to a club than anything else. Maybe if the AFL clubs could rate a little higher they wouldn't need to borrow so heavily from the banks.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:33 am
by AFLcrap1
leagueiscrap wrote:
Organisation Description
OzTAM  Jointly owned and operated by commercial television networks Seven, Nine and Ten.
 Measures audiences across the five metropolitan capital cities: Sydney, Melbourne,
Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth.
 Utilises a panel of approximately 3,000 homes across measured markets.
 An “establishment survey” is performed on a continual basis throughout the year,
utilising telephone interviews to define the population to be represented in the panel.
 A “peoplemeter” is installed onto each household’s television/s which tracks the
usage of the set. Upon television usage, the peoplemeter asks the viewer which
member /s of the household are watching television to enable OzTAM/Regional TAM
to calculate demographic data of the viewership.

Regional TAM  A joint venture comprising of five commercial regional networks: NBN, Prime, Seven
Queensland, South Cross Broadcasting and WIN.
 Measures audiences across the five aggregated markets across the east coast of
Australia: Queensland, Northern NSW, Southern NSW, Victoria and Tasmania.
 Utilises a panel of approximately 2,000 homes across measured markets.
 An establishment survey and peoplemeters are utilised similarly to those discussed
above

page 37


:-k
so 5000 ratings boxes OZTAM use that represents 23 million Australians
and the bumsniffers pin their popularity of their game on that :(/ :(/ :(/
yet are decades behind in every other area when compared to the AFL :)))
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh Dumbo you should have been a comedian.

So now Wookie posts something that shows RL going great in the Ratings DEPT.
& as per the AFL Propaganda book....you try to discredit how those ratings are accumulated.
As was said.TV execs make $ 1,000,000,000 + deals using those figures .

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 4:49 pm
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
Organisation Description
OzTAM  Jointly owned and operated by commercial television networks Seven, Nine and Ten.
 Measures audiences across the five metropolitan capital cities: Sydney, Melbourne,
Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth.
 Utilises a panel of approximately 3,000 homes across measured markets.
 An “establishment survey” is performed on a continual basis throughout the year,
utilising telephone interviews to define the population to be represented in the panel.
 A “peoplemeter” is installed onto each household’s television/s which tracks the
usage of the set. Upon television usage, the peoplemeter asks the viewer which
member /s of the household are watching television to enable OzTAM/Regional TAM
to calculate demographic data of the viewership.

Regional TAM  A joint venture comprising of five commercial regional networks: NBN, Prime, Seven
Queensland, South Cross Broadcasting and WIN.
 Measures audiences across the five aggregated markets across the east coast of
Australia: Queensland, Northern NSW, Southern NSW, Victoria and Tasmania.
 Utilises a panel of approximately 2,000 homes across measured markets.
 An establishment survey and peoplemeters are utilised similarly to those discussed
above

page 37


:-k
so 5000 ratings boxes OZTAM use that represents 23 million Australians
and the bumsniffers pin their popularity of their game on that :(/ :(/ :(/
yet are decades behind in every other area when compared to the AFL :)))
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oh Dumbo you should have been a comedian.

So now Wookie posts something that shows RL going great in the Ratings DEPT.
& as per the AFL Propaganda book....you try to discredit how those ratings are accumulated.
As was said.TV execs make $ 1,000,000,000 + deals using those figures .

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
the Television network is worth billions of dollars, & the networks employ thousands people, oztam is jointly owned by networks Seven, Nine and Ten.
the ratings is crap
the networks have set the ratings up to protect their interests and protect the industry
5 thousand rating boxes that represents 23 million people :lol:
if the ratings where so accurate when comparing AFL vs the NRL
why is the NRL so far behind in every other department?
revenue
crowds
sponsorship ( the NRL is the dominate code in the first and 3rd biggest advertising markets & still get flogged by the AFL
participation numbers

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:21 pm
by pussycat
Once upon a time,
leagueiscrap wrote:

Once upon a time.....

the Television network is worth billions of dollars, & the networks employ thousands people, oztam is jointly owned by networks Seven, Nine and Ten.
the ratings is crap
the networks have set the ratings up to protect their interests and protect the industry
5 thousand rating boxes that represents 23 million people :lol:
if the ratings where so accurate when comparing AFL vs the NRL
why is the NRL so far behind in every other department?
revenue
crowds
sponsorship ( the NRL is the dominate code in the first and 3rd biggest advertising markets & still get flogged by the AFL
participation numbers
......they lived happily ever after.
If C7 competitors are 9&10, and C 9 competitors are 7&10, and c10 competitors are 9&7, then who is it there protecting there own interests from?

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:23 pm
by AFLcrap1
pussycat wrote:
Once upon a time,
leagueiscrap wrote:

Once upon a time.....

the Television network is worth billions of dollars, & the networks employ thousands people, oztam is jointly owned by networks Seven, Nine and Ten.
the ratings is crap
the networks have set the ratings up to protect their interests and protect the industry
5 thousand rating boxes that represents 23 million people :lol:
if the ratings where so accurate when comparing AFL vs the NRL
why is the NRL so far behind in every other department?
revenue
crowds
sponsorship ( the NRL is the dominate code in the first and 3rd biggest advertising markets & still get flogged by the AFL
participation numbers
......they lived happily ever after.
If C7 competitors are 9&10, and C 9 competitors are 7&10, and c10 competitors are 9&7, then who is it there protecting there own interests from?
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
He'll be back after a 3 day metho bender & ignore this post & ramble on with the usual shit...Pokes pokes pokes ..RL is dying pokes pokes .

:(/ :lol:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:33 pm
by pussycat
Does anyone know the ratings for last nights AFL game - no mention of it on twitter.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:05 pm
by pussycat
ok, thanks wookie

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 10:39 pm
by leagueiscrap
pussycat wrote:
Once upon a time,
leagueiscrap wrote:

Once upon a time.....

the Television network is worth billions of dollars, & the networks employ thousands people, oztam is jointly owned by networks Seven, Nine and Ten.
the ratings is crap
the networks have set the ratings up to protect their interests and protect the industry
5 thousand rating boxes that represents 23 million people :lol:
if the ratings where so accurate when comparing AFL vs the NRL
why is the NRL so far behind in every other department?
revenue
crowds
sponsorship ( the NRL is the dominate code in the first and 3rd biggest advertising markets & still get flogged by the AFL
participation numbers
......they lived happily ever after.
If C7 competitors are 9&10, and C 9 competitors are 7&10, and c10 competitors are 9&7, then who is it there protecting there own interests from?
they are each protecting their own investments, OZTAM is a joint ownership.
its funny how the NRL is decades behind in every other area :lol:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:26 am
by NlolRL
2 live NRL games:
@MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 572k (Syd 347k Bri 224k) GEM 39k (Mel 25k Per 14k) = 611k

1 live AFL game: @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #AFL #AFLSwansDons Seven 448k (Mel 339k Ade 109k) 7mate 175k (Syd 69k Bri 20k Per 86k) = 623k

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 11:18 am
by pussycat
NlolRL wrote:

Once upon a time time on the Southern side of a great river. There was a magical land called Dee. In this land horses flew with butterfly wings and bumble bees had lost there sting....

2 live NRL games:
@MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 572k (Syd 347k Bri 224k) GEM 39k (Mel 25k Per 14k) = 611k

1 live AFL game: @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #AFL #AFLSwansDons Seven 448k (Mel 339k Ade 109k) 7mate 175k (Syd 69k Bri 20k Per 86k) = 623k

....And they all lived happily ever after
One game is shown to half the NRL heartland and one game shown to the other half of NRL heartland. Opposed to one game shown to the entire AFL heartland.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 11:37 am
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote:
NlolRL wrote:

Once upon a time time on the Southern side of a great river. There was a magical land called Dee. In this land horses flew with butterfly wings and bumble bees had lost there sting....

2 live NRL games:
@MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 572k (Syd 347k Bri 224k) GEM 39k (Mel 25k Per 14k) = 611k

1 live AFL game: @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #AFL #AFLSwansDons Seven 448k (Mel 339k Ade 109k) 7mate 175k (Syd 69k Bri 20k Per 86k) = 623k

....And they all lived happily ever after
One game is shown to half the NRL heartland and one game shown to the other half of NRL heartland. Opposed to one game shown to the entire AFL heartland.
We know, to maximise ratings in each heartland. Yet the single AFL game is still winning most weeks. Ouch

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 11:51 am
by pussycat
NlolRL wrote:
pussycat wrote:
NlolRL wrote:

Once upon a time time on the Southern side of a great river. There was a magical land called Dee. In this land horses flew with butterfly wings and bumble bees had lost there sting....

2 live NRL games:
@MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 572k (Syd 347k Bri 224k) GEM 39k (Mel 25k Per 14k) = 611k

1 live AFL game: @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #AFL #AFLSwansDons Seven 448k (Mel 339k Ade 109k) 7mate 175k (Syd 69k Bri 20k Per 86k) = 623k

....And they all lived happily ever after
One game is shown to half the NRL heartland and one game shown to the other half of NRL heartland. Opposed to one game shown to the entire AFL heartland.
We know, to maximise ratings in each heartland. Yet the single AFL game is still winning most weeks. Ouch
Outsude of the Origin rounds the NRL would win most weeks. during rounds 11-18 the NRL are more concered with getting games that rate 4m. :wink: Those games attract a lager audience in Melbourne than your game last night, and does most weeks ...ouch :cheers:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 12:06 pm
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote:
NlolRL wrote:
pussycat wrote:
NlolRL wrote:

Once upon a time time on the Southern side of a great river. There was a magical land called Dee. In this land horses flew with butterfly wings and bumble bees had lost there sting....

2 live NRL games:
@MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #NRL Nine 572k (Syd 347k Bri 224k) GEM 39k (Mel 25k Per 14k) = 611k

1 live AFL game: @MediaweekAUS: Fri TV #AFL #AFLSwansDons Seven 448k (Mel 339k Ade 109k) 7mate 175k (Syd 69k Bri 20k Per 86k) = 623k

....And they all lived happily ever after
One game is shown to half the NRL heartland and one game shown to the other half of NRL heartland. Opposed to one game shown to the entire AFL heartland.
We know, to maximise ratings in each heartland. Yet the single AFL game is still winning most weeks. Ouch
Outsude of the Origin rounds the NRL would win most weeks. during rounds 11-18 the NRL are more concered with getting games that rate 4m. :wink: Those games attract a lager audience in Melbourne than your game last night, and does most weeks ...ouch :cheers:
Reso again you're left with soo. Hehe

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 12:19 pm
by Phelpsy
I think Wookie put this best... Origin does not reflect overall interest in rl. Just as the 100 metre final at the Olympics does not reflect overall interest in athletics. They are marquee events.