Page 364 of 852

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 10:54 pm
by pussycat
Your regionals will be no more than 1/3 of your Metro number.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:00 am
by pussycat
Another80% of vic regionals :_<> :_<> That would give you more regionals than NSW . The only vic regionals I could fin was Anzac day 950 metro barely 200 vic regionals - 300 regionals all up

Your total ratings might be close But there is no doubt about what code rates better

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:28 pm
by pussycat
25% of your teams dont rate, and spend most of there time in poor timeslots. thats why they get poor numbers. Though if were making excuses 2/3 of our FTA is delayed - one game by two hours. By not counting NZ home Audience means there game loses about 40% each week .

Just on that AFL link you gave me, it shows 2 Fox gamer getting 400K + in the first week, whats going on there?

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 6:55 pm
by pussycat
We tailor 0 games a week solely into fringe markets.

We show 3 games a week into our main markets. Our Fringe market get to watch these. Because they rate poorly C9 show them on it's secondary channel.

We have 3 games a week - Total. 2 are shown Friday night and It would make no difference to total ratings or Average ratings regardless of whether there treated as a live or Parramatta v St George (half live/half delayed) or Brisbane vs Cronulla (Half live half delayed).

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 12:02 am
by pussycat
Wookie , would you have the AFL average PayTV ratings for 2012 and 2013?

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 12:45 pm
by Fred
So using ratingd,as,a measure ofpopularity for nrl and AFL in Australia the AFL clearly wins.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 3:14 pm
by pussycat
Fred wrote:
So using ratingd,as,a measure ofpopularity for nrl and AFL in Australia the AFL clearly wins.
No Fred , They don't clearly win on total ratings - not even if you restrict it to 90% of the NRL.

Close but not close enough . Enjoy that silver medal.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:11 pm
by Fred
440 nrl 486 AFL and nrl figure includes nz. take,nz out and,it is worse

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:26 pm
by pussycat
The NRL show 3 matches on FTA - Total. Regardless of who watches it is 3 matches. It is what C9 contact says and they average over 800k doing so.

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:29 pm
by Fred
Averages ... Doesn't matter if 3 or 30 its an average.

AFL wins .... As shown

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:21 pm
by pussycat
You'll have to pardon my ignorance here, trying to link the make-up of the audience with the average is not something us folks living North of the Murray are'nt used to :wink:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:13 am
by pussycat
I have no problems as total rating but reflecting Averages [-X

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 2:24 pm
by leagueiscrap
pussycat wrote:
I have no problems as total rating but reflecting Averages [-X
the oveall average will be better for the NRL
the games shown on FTA or fox, are in prime time and never run in conjunction with each other.
the AFL games are shown in all different time slots, early/ mid saturday and sunday afternoon slots as well as evening, many game being played around or at the same time as each other. on FTA and FOX.
so crap on all you want NRL looses
the AFL has crowds, Memberships & sponsorship & revenue to back its popularity up
the NRL does not
only except a SOO state vs gimmick, for 3 games a year people give a crap about NRL because of that factor, out side that, few care about it :lol:

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:44 pm
by Raiderdave
leagueiscrap wrote:
pussycat wrote:
I have no problems as total rating but reflecting Averages [-X
the oveall average will be better for the NRL
the games shown on FTA or fox, are in prime time and never run in conjunction with each other.
the AFL games are shown in all different time slots, early/ mid saturday and sunday afternoon slots as well as evening, many game being played around or at the same time as each other. on FTA and FOX.
so crap on all you want NRL looses
the AFL has crowds, Memberships & sponsorship & revenue to back its popularity up
the NRL does not
only except a SOO state vs gimmick, for 3 games a year people give a crap about NRL because of that factor, out side that, few care about it :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :(/ :(/ :(/ :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

but but but but

RL
10 million more veiwers then the derps & feebles ... even with the bumbles & misses having more games
& more on FTA
embrace RL's dominance you moron :cool:

or as Flipsey would put it
moran 8-[

:lol: :lol: :lol: :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:59 pm
by Fred
pussycat wrote:
Fred wrote:
So using ratingd,as,a measure ofpopularity for nrl and AFL in Australia the AFL clearly wins.
No Fred , They don't clearly win on total ratings - not even if you restrict it to 90% of the NRL.

Close but not close enough . Enjoy that silver medal.

Can you not read ? Go to wookies post and look at total average for home and away