Talking Footy

Swans Forever, I hate to bring some reality into your fantasy world but the Swans aren't the biggest club in Sydney - far from it. they are about as insignificant as a gnat that needs stepping on. And there profit of 600k being the largest by a Sydney club is sheer gobildeegook .

So what's the average for the nrl and AFL? Total ratings divided by total games for the week. And year

For Australia

Fred wrote:

So what's the average for the nrl and AFL? Total ratings divided by total games for the week. And year

I don't know for the week - you wouldn't believe me if I did. Im sure though if you ask Wookie politely, she will tell you how far ahead our averages are

Fred wrote:

For Australia

You will still come second.

pussycat wrote:

Swans Forever, I hate to bring some reality into your fantasy world but the Swans aren't the biggest club in Sydney - far from it. they are about as insignificant as a gnat that needs stepping on. And there profit of 600k being the largest by a Sydney club is sheer gobildeegook .

Seriously Pussy are you saying that ONLY tv ratings are the determinative factor to determine how big a club is?????? Answer me this - are the following;
Sponsorship
Crowds
Membership
Total football club football related revenue (I will not consider revenue from leagues clubs because are tipping money into poke machines not because they follow that club)
Merchandising

If you are stupid enough to say that these indicators aren't equal if not more important than TV ratings in order to determine a clubs size - than really your living in a fantasy world!!!!

Additionally if you say they do then the Swans are top in ALL these areas - which proves that are the largest club in Sydney!

Lastly tell me this what is the percentage of the ratings that follow a particular club????? I already know the answer - and you won't be able to tell me - 1st there are two clubs competing AND interested onlookers who support neither clubs! - 2nd if the ratings takers knew who individual households followed it would be open to question the entire ratings system - it can be open to manipulation and these ratings would lose integrity in their product!!!! So therefore ratings are the LEAST reliable indicator of popularity for these very reasons! Hate to burst your bubble but those are the facts - time for you to head back to those hills there pussy!!!!

Swans4ever wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Swans Forever, I hate to bring some reality into your fantasy world but the Swans aren't the biggest club in Sydney - far from it. they are about as insignificant as a gnat that needs stepping on. And there profit of 600k being the largest by a Sydney club is sheer gobildeegook .

Seriously Pussy are you saying that ONLY tv ratings are the determinative factor to determine how big a club is?????? Answer me this - are the following;
Sponsorship
Crowds
Membership
Total football club football related revenue (I will not consider revenue from leagues clubs because are tipping money into poke machines not because they follow that club)
Merchandising

If you are stupid enough to say that these indicators aren't equal if not more important than TV ratings in order to determine a clubs size - than really your living in a fantasy world!!!!

Additionally if you say they do then the Swans are top in ALL these areas - which proves that are the largest club in Sydney!

Lastly tell me this what is the percentage of the ratings that follow a particular club????? I already know the answer - and you won't be able to tell me - 1st there are two clubs competing AND interested onlookers who support neither clubs! - 2nd if the ratings takers knew who individual households followed it would be open to question the entire ratings system - it can be open to manipulation and these ratings would lose integrity in their product!!!! So therefore ratings are the LEAST reliable indicator of popularity for these very reasons! Hate to burst your bubble but those are the facts - time for you to head back to those hills there pussy!!!!

you've had these questions answered before Sgt Rambo
every one

& they all lead to the same end answer

the Swines are jokes in Ol Sydney town
jokes


now don't go all chuck Norris round house kick to the throat on us now will ya

Swans4ever wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Swans Forever, I hate to bring some reality into your fantasy world but the Swans aren't the biggest club in Sydney - far from it. they are about as insignificant as a gnat that needs stepping on. And there profit of 600k being the largest by a Sydney club is sheer gobildeegook .

Seriously Pussy are you saying that ONLY tv ratings are the determinative factor to determine how big a club is?????? Answer me this - are the following;
Sponsorship
Crowds
Membership
Total football club football related revenue (I will not consider revenue from leagues clubs because are tipping money into poke machines not because they follow that club)
Merchandising

If you are stupid enough to say that these indicators aren't equal if not more important than TV ratings in order to determine a clubs size - than really your living in a fantasy world!!!!

Additionally if you say they do then the Swans are top in ALL these areas - which proves that are the largest club in Sydney!

Lastly tell me this what is the percentage of the ratings that follow a particular club????? I already know the answer - and you won't be able to tell me - 1st there are two clubs competing AND interested onlookers who support neither clubs! - 2nd if the ratings takers knew who individual households followed it would be open to question the entire ratings system - it can be open to manipulation and these ratings would lose integrity in their product!!!! So therefore ratings are the LEAST reliable indicator of popularity for these very reasons! Hate to burst your bubble but those are the facts - time for you to head back to those hills there pussy!!!!

Its not so easy to disprove your fantasys about being Sydneys biggest club . But your weird fantasys about biggest profit are.

While the 3 three factors you named maybe a factor in detetermening the biggest club they fall down - alarmingly - in the finances, ratings and on field Success departments. And your claim about sponsership is just that - a clam.

The_Wookie wrote:

As of this morning - on published data only

H&A average = AFL 483k, NRL 441k
All games = NRL 512k, AFL 437k

Total Ratings - H&A - AFL 60,845,000, NRL 50,660,000
Total Ratings - ALL games - NRL 63,474,000, AFL 62,548,000

Note: All ratings and total ratings include published NZ and Regionals for all games, includng preseason, tests and origin.

By territory

Fox - Total AFL - 26.5 million @ 185 ave, NRL - 16.47 million @ 214 ave
FTA - Total NRL - 44.28 million @ 1.006 million ave, AFL 36.048 million @ 316 ave

Syd - NRL 15.757m @ 322. AFL 1.995m @ 33
Melb - AFL 16.823 @300, NRL 1.833m @ 37
Bris - NRL 9.162m @ 187, AFL 1.797m @ 29
Adl - AFL 7.589m @ 119, NRL 0.256m @ 6
Per - AFL 5.754m @ 91, NRL 0.816m @ 17
NZ - NRL - 2.743m @ 74, AFL 0 @ 0
Regional - NRL 16.458m @ 422, AFL 2.183m @ 91

There you go .. AFL out rates nrl

Nurse!

pussycat wrote:

Nurse!

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Swans Forever, I hate to bring some reality into your fantasy world but the Swans aren't the biggest club in Sydney - far from it. they are about as insignificant as a gnat that needs stepping on. And there profit of 600k being the largest by a Sydney club is sheer gobildeegook .

Seriously Pussy are you saying that ONLY tv ratings are the determinative factor to determine how big a club is?????? Answer me this - are the following;
Sponsorship
Crowds
Membership
Total football club football related revenue (I will not consider revenue from leagues clubs because are tipping money into poke machines not because they follow that club)
Merchandising

If you are stupid enough to say that these indicators aren't equal if not more important than TV ratings in order to determine a clubs size - than really your living in a fantasy world!!!!

Additionally if you say they do then the Swans are top in ALL these areas - which proves that are the largest club in Sydney!

Lastly tell me this what is the percentage of the ratings that follow a particular club????? I already know the answer - and you won't be able to tell me - 1st there are two clubs competing AND interested onlookers who support neither clubs! - 2nd if the ratings takers knew who individual households followed it would be open to question the entire ratings system - it can be open to manipulation and these ratings would lose integrity in their product!!!! So therefore ratings are the LEAST reliable indicator of popularity for these very reasons! Hate to burst your bubble but those are the facts - time for you to head back to those hills there pussy!!!!

you've had these questions answered before Sgt Rambo
every one

& they all lead to the same end answer

the Swines are jokes in Ol Sydney town
jokes


now don't go all chuck Norris round house kick to the throat on us now will ya

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

pussycat wrote:

Nurse!

Club Level only; Fox: NRL by a good 10% , FTA: Nrl also win here


Add Rep Football, its no longer close

Add NZ:

Work them out by highest rating matches.

Are you reading wookies figures ?

Fred wrote:

Are you reading wookies figures ?

This is Wookies bottom line on the total amount of ratings.

wookie wrote:

Total Ratings - ALL games - NRL 63,474,000, AFL 62,548,000

A small win to the NRL however the real issue is, these ratings have been achieved with twice as many foxtel games and extra FTA games.

As I said;

Club Level only; Fox: NRL by a good 10% , FTA: Nrl also win here


Add Rep Football, its no longer close

Add NZ:

Work them out by highest rating matches.