Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 1:30 pm
Saturday = 659k
So far this round 2.82m
So far this round 2.82m
3.7m for the round.
no more than 3.5m for them - another complete smashing.
Talking Footy
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
2018 - NRL - Rugby League TV Ratings
Page 37 of 52
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 1:48 pm
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 1:56 pm
but when considering our game goes for 50% more time the AFL was EASILY the most watched sport of the weekendpussycat wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 1:48 pm3.8m for the round.
no more than 3.5m for them - another complete smashing.
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 2:52 pm
Oh dear!!!! This poor dill is descending into total delusion. He must be drinking the same cool aid as the Shanghai & Spotless stadium crowd counters lolololololololol.
Sad really!!!!!
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 3:01 pm
Wow!!!!! If they only got 3.5M that's 600k down on R9 2017!!!!!! It's amazing no media are reporting on this. The AFL is leaking 100k's viewers per week. In fact in week 1 of the Comm games they lost over 1M & nearly 2M in the 2nd week.pussycat wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 1:48 pm3.8m for the round.
no more than 3.5m for them - another complete smashing.
They have literally lost multi millions of viewers in only 9 weeks. Surely someone in the mainstream media is going to pick up on this. #AFLcrisis.
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 3:17 pm
Most watched Terry. 27 hrs of AFL watched by a similar sized audience as the 16 hours of NRL. Most watched by FARTerry wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 2:52 pmOh dear!!!! This poor dill is descending into total delusion. He must be drinking the same cool aid as the Shanghai & Spotless stadium crowd counters lolololololololol.
Sad really!!!!!
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 3:44 pm
Oh dear.....your delusion has reached such depths it's pointless even responding to it. You'd better set up your own ratings agency.....good luck with that lolololololololololol.NlolRL wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 3:17 pmMost watched Terry. 27 hrs of AFL watched by a similar sized audience as the 16 hours of NRL. Most watched by FARTerry wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 2:52 pmOh dear!!!! This poor dill is descending into total delusion. He must be drinking the same cool aid as the Shanghai & Spotless stadium crowd counters lolololololololol.NlolRL wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 1:56 pm
but when considering our game goes for 50% more time the AFL was EASILY the most watched sport of the weekend
Sad really!!!!!
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 3:57 pm
it's pure logic Terry. 3m people watching a sport for 27 hours compared to only 16. The AFL is most watched by a massive marginTerry wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 3:44 pmOh dear.....your delusion has reached such depths it's pointless even responding to it. You'd better set up your own ratings agency.....good luck with that lolololololololololol.NlolRL wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 3:17 pmMost watched Terry. 27 hrs of AFL watched by a similar sized audience as the 16 hours of NRL. Most watched by FARTerry wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 2:52 pm
Oh dear!!!! This poor dill is descending into total delusion. He must be drinking the same cool aid as the Shanghai & Spotless stadium crowd counters lolololololololol.
Sad really!!!!!
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 4:14 pm
do you think if the NRL decided to install 2 extra breaks and increase its half time by a further 10minsNlolRL wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 3:57 pmit's pure logic Terry. 3m people watching a sport for 27 hours compared to only 16. The AFL is most watched by a massive marginTerry wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 3:44 pmOh dear.....your delusion has reached such depths it's pointless even responding to it. You'd better set up your own ratings agency.....good luck with that lolololololololololol.NlolRL wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 3:17 pm
Most watched Terry. 27 hrs of AFL watched by a similar sized audience as the 16 hours of NRL. Most watched by FAR
we all those extra advertisements into every game like the AFL have
the NRL would double AFL tv rights deal...
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 6:16 pm
if you lengthen your telecast with ads or padding your average ratings will drop. People dont tune in for the adsleeroy*NRL* wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 4:14 pmdo you think if the NRL decided to install 2 extra breaks and increase its half time by a further 10minsNlolRL wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 3:57 pmit's pure logic Terry. 3m people watching a sport for 27 hours compared to only 16. The AFL is most watched by a massive marginTerry wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 3:44 pm
Oh dear.....your delusion has reached such depths it's pointless even responding to it. You'd better set up your own ratings agency.....good luck with that lolololololololololol.
we all those extra advertisements into every game like the AFL have
the NRL would double AFL tv rights deal...
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 7:36 pm
I dunno pal.....where does one start? I'll take it easy on ya because in your brief moments of clarity you seem like a decent enough chap........but of course hopelessly deluded by Gilligan & the gang.
Ok: The ratings announced are the average over the time of a particular telecast. If a show goes for 30 mins, 1 hour, 2 hours or 3 hours the premise is the same. i.e. the average over the time of the telecast is the rating number. It does not and cannot multiply by any valuation, either up or down, due to it's length. Understand? No. Didn't think so loololololol.
Bottom line: just because a particular program goes for longer than another does not and cannot mean it automatically has higher ratings. It is the same ppl watching the same program a little longer. Simple yes? Didn't think so lololololololol.
For your delusion to be correct it would mean one group of ppl watch the first half of a game, then turn off or watch something else, and another totally different set of ppl watch the 2nd half. That is of course ludicrous.
The only thing of consequence a longer telecast brings AFL should be a much bigger broadcast deal compared to the NRL......but that didn't happen either. So it's a lose lose for the longer telecast pal lololololo.
OK: understand all that????? No. Well I've done my best. In future I'll be bringing out the old goldfish bowl lolololololol.
Ok: The ratings announced are the average over the time of a particular telecast. If a show goes for 30 mins, 1 hour, 2 hours or 3 hours the premise is the same. i.e. the average over the time of the telecast is the rating number. It does not and cannot multiply by any valuation, either up or down, due to it's length. Understand? No. Didn't think so loololololol.
Bottom line: just because a particular program goes for longer than another does not and cannot mean it automatically has higher ratings. It is the same ppl watching the same program a little longer. Simple yes? Didn't think so lololololololol.
For your delusion to be correct it would mean one group of ppl watch the first half of a game, then turn off or watch something else, and another totally different set of ppl watch the 2nd half. That is of course ludicrous.
The only thing of consequence a longer telecast brings AFL should be a much bigger broadcast deal compared to the NRL......but that didn't happen either. So it's a lose lose for the longer telecast pal lololololo.
OK: understand all that????? No. Well I've done my best. In future I'll be bringing out the old goldfish bowl lolololololol.
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 9:13 pm
I totally understand what average ratings mean. However, the length of time must come into consideration when considering multiple 'sessions'. Why? Well I support 1 team and will watch them on TV or attend their games most weeks. However, I do not have time to watch another 24 hours of footy in one weekend. Where as you only need to watch another 14 hours to have watched every game, and 2 of those hours are on Thursday night. If we both spent those 14 hours watching our sport you are counted as watching 7 more games, while Im counted as watching less than 5.Terry wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 7:36 pmI dunno pal.....where does one start? I'll take it easy on ya because in your brief moments of clarity you seem like a decent enough chap........but of course hopelessly deluded by Gilligan & the gang.
Ok: The ratings announced are the average over the time of a particular telecast. If a show goes for 30 mins, 1 hour, 2 hours or 3 hours the premise is the same. i.e. the average over the time of the telecast is the rating number. It does not and cannot multiply by any valuation, either up or down, due to it's length. Understand? No. Didn't think so loololololol.
Bottom line: just because a particular program goes for longer than another does not and cannot mean it automatically has higher ratings. It is the same ppl watching the same program a little longer. Simple yes? Didn't think so lololololololol.
For your delusion to be correct it would mean one group of ppl watch the first half of a game, then turn off or watch something else, and another totally different set of ppl watch the 2nd half. That is of course ludicrous.
The only thing of consequence a longer telecast brings AFL should be a much bigger broadcast deal compared to the NRL......but that didn't happen either. So it's a lose lose for the longer telecast pal lololololo.
OK: understand all that????? No. Well I've done my best. In future I'll be bringing out the old goldfish bowl lolololololol.
You laugh at the AFL's foxtel ratings on Saturday, and many are low compared to the 3 NRL games. But who the hell watches 15-18 hours of sport in one day. You only have 6 hours to watch every game, which is far more feasible than 15 hours.
Length of time makes a massive difference to ratings when considering multiple games.
Will you understand or acknowledge this? Of course not!
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Mon May 21, 2018 11:03 pm
Yet there's not one person out there who agrees with your bizarro theory .
No ratings company .
No media
Nobody .
You're delusional .
No ratings company .
No media
Nobody .
You're delusional .
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Tue May 22, 2018 10:15 am
Sorry pal, it's just nonsensical rubbish. A longer program does not and cannot mean bigger ratings. It is the average over the time of the program whether it is 1h, 2hr's, 3hr's. If 10 ppl watch a 3 hour program you just cannot say it's actually 15 ppl because of the length of the program......because it's not!! It's still 10 ppl.
And your Saturday ratings are a scheduling problem. The AFL schedules the less attractive games for the worse spots which are Saturdays. They offset this by having FTA TV into all home markets. If you want to change this get Gilligan to change the scheduling - simple. You just cannot say because of the scheduling we should multiply the ratings we get ........because it's not the real number. It's a manufactured fantasy number that does not in reality exist.
And your Saturday ratings are a scheduling problem. The AFL schedules the less attractive games for the worse spots which are Saturdays. They offset this by having FTA TV into all home markets. If you want to change this get Gilligan to change the scheduling - simple. You just cannot say because of the scheduling we should multiply the ratings we get ........because it's not the real number. It's a manufactured fantasy number that does not in reality exist.
Re: 2018 - Rugby League TV Ratings - NRL etc
Posted: Tue May 22, 2018 4:55 pm
show me a ratings company, media company, or network that compares cumulative ratings for different programs......AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon May 21, 2018 11:03 pmYet there's not one person out there who agrees with your bizarro theory .
No ratings company .
No media
Nobody .
You're delusional .