Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

So the Swans being the most popular team in NSW isn't a success, :

yes .. a team that the telle tubbies round up on TV is the most popular team in NSW



cockhead

Biggest crowds, biggest sponsorship deals, biggest membership etc. Swans > anyone else in NSW.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

So the Swans being the most popular team in NSW isn't a success, :

yes .. a team that the telle tubbies round up on TV is the most popular team in NSW



cockhead

Biggest crowds, biggest sponsorship deals, biggest membership etc. Swans > anyone else in NSW.

least actual interest though

the Sharks n Penrith could get 5 times the number of sets of eyes watching them .. then watch the swines in sydney
its just hilarious to suggest they are popular , when its obvious most people in our nations largest city ....really couldn't give a fuck about them

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

yes .. a team that the telle tubbies round up on TV is the most popular team in NSW



cockhead

Biggest crowds, biggest sponsorship deals, biggest membership etc. Swans > anyone else in NSW.

least actual interest though

the Sharks n Penrith could get 5 times the number of sets of eyes watching them .. then watch the swines in sydney
its just hilarious to suggest they are popular , when its obvious most people in our nations largest city ....really couldn't give a fuck about them

Bull shite. They get RL fans eyes, not shark fans! Fans of a club turn up at their games, and we know the sharks have crowds 1/3 the size of the swans

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

yes .. a team that the telle tubbies round up on TV is the most popular team in NSW



cockhead

Biggest crowds, biggest sponsorship deals, biggest membership etc. Swans > anyone else in NSW.

least actual interest though

So going to games and buying memberships doesn't equal "actual interest"?

What a minda!

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Biggest crowds, biggest sponsorship deals, biggest membership etc. Swans > anyone else in NSW.

least actual interest though

So going to games and buying memberships doesn't equal "actual interest"?

What a minda!

actual means ..... depth of interest
for the swines


there is pretty much actually ........ none

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

least actual interest though

So going to games and buying memberships doesn't equal "actual interest"?

What a minda!

actual means ..... depth of interest
for the swines


there is pretty much actually ........ none

33k, isnt that more than ANY nRL team?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

So going to games and buying memberships doesn't equal "actual interest"?

What a minda!

actual means ..... depth of interest
for the swines


there is pretty much actually ........ none

33k, isnt that more than ANY nRL team?

& yet they can barely get many more then that to watch them on tv
I mean
a Holden cup match can do better on pay tv then the swines can on FTA
meaning that

actually
the interest is quite low ....

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

least actual interest though

So going to games and buying memberships doesn't equal "actual interest"?

What a minda!

actual means ..... depth of interest
for the swines


there is pretty much actually ........ none

Shit, if he thinks 33k members means no interest, I'd hate to see what he thinks about Penrif's membership tally!

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

So going to games and buying memberships doesn't equal "actual interest"?

What a minda!

actual means ..... depth of interest
for the swines


there is pretty much actually ........ none

Shit, if he thinks 33k members means no interest, I'd hate to see what he thinks about Penrif's membership tally!

penrith 6K members & 250K veiwers on TV
256K interested parties in the panthers

swines 33K members & 40K veiwers on TV
73K interested parties in the swines

So 250k in Sydney support Penrith? Interesting how only 6k are interested enough to become a member or to to their games. Wow, what support!

Xman wrote:

So 250k in Sydney support Penrith? Interesting how only 6k are interested enough to become a member or to to their games. Wow, what support!

He doesn't understand that not everyone watching an nRL game goes for whoever is playing in it. Who knows, only 40k of the 250k watching a Penrif game might be Panfers fans.

It's free and enjoyable to watch on the box so why wouldn't those 250k be great supporters. Marngrook on the other hand, despite the billions spent on fancy cameras, still isn't quite there as something the masses enjoy on tv in sydney. Why? Because they really don't understand nor like the game, that's why and that's the diff in support for the swans and penny panthers.

Oh and stewie. Maybe only half the folk watching the swans game are swans supporters.

Another absolute thrashing in the NRL with yet again one team failing to score any points. Is this the most lopsided competition of any sport in the world? Serious question. KE, thoughts?

Beaussie wrote:

Another absolute thrashing in the NRL with yet again one team failing to score any points. Is this the most lopsided competition of any sport in the world? Serious question. KE, thoughts?

FMD another 0? What a joke!

Beaussie wrote:

Another absolute thrashing in the NRL with yet again one team failing to score any points. Is this the most lopsided competition of any sport in the world? Serious question. KE, thoughts?

but it was a hard frought win buy the roosters!
a 38 to 0 win in thugby terms would easily be a 100plus point win win in an AFL game.
this season in the NRL there have been, quite a few teams failing to even score point in a game.