Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

enarelle wrote:

Think you are confusing the NRL with the AFL again. NRL ratings drop per game during SOO because of the focus that SOO brings and top players being unavailable. It is not about the reduced number of games.

But in the end it doesn't matter if the total NRL package is used as reference point.

Oh oh NRL got pants again on Friday night - ememarella is clearly very upset that his widdle NRL is suffering at the TV box - suck it up princess!

Ah right on time ,stupid jumps in .
When the Fri night Regionals are added(av 400K) then we win again.

how about the AFL regionals they are not included as well
NT and regional SA are not even covered in the TV ratings.
so meh AFL wins again, in this flooded system, that you bed wetters cling so dearly on to

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

enarelle wrote:

Think you are confusing the NRL with the AFL again. NRL ratings drop per game during SOO because of the focus that SOO brings and top players being unavailable. It is not about the reduced number of games.

But in the end it doesn't matter if the total NRL package is used as reference point.

Oh oh NRL got pants again on Friday night - ememarella is clearly very upset that his widdle NRL is suffering at the TV box - suck it up princess!

Ah right on time ,stupid jumps in .
When the Fri night Regionals are added(av 400K) then we win again.

Yes yes heard it all again!

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

enarelle wrote:

Think you are confusing the NRL with the AFL again. NRL ratings drop per game during SOO because of the focus that SOO brings and top players being unavailable. It is not about the reduced number of games.

But in the end it doesn't matter if the total NRL package is used as reference point.

Oh oh NRL got pants again on Friday night - ememarella is clearly very upset that his widdle NRL is suffering at the TV box - suck it up princess!

Ah right on time ,stupid jumps in .
When the Fri night Regionals are added(av 400K) then we win again.

how about the AFL regionals they are not included as well
NT and regional SA are not even covered in the TV ratings.

:_<> :_<> :_<>
all regionals are included for the fumbles n feebles you filthy lying *****

The_Wookie wrote:

that does kind of lend credence to the idea that Origin is an event in its own right rather than a part of the season, simply because those ratings arent reflected at any other time.

You mean like your Grand Final Wookie?

Regardless of having ratings much larger than average , aren't these ratings, never the less, the reason that respective networks are paying out big money?

Raiderdave wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

enarelle wrote:

Think you are confusing the NRL with the AFL again. NRL ratings drop per game during SOO because of the focus that SOO brings and top players being unavailable. It is not about the reduced number of games.

But in the end it doesn't matter if the total NRL package is used as reference point.

Oh oh NRL got pants again on Friday night - ememarella is clearly very upset that his widdle NRL is suffering at the TV box - suck it up princess!

Ah right on time ,stupid jumps in .
When the Fri night Regionals are added(av 400K) then we win again.

how about the AFL regionals they are not included as well
NT and regional SA are not even covered in the TV ratings.

:_<> :_<> :_<>
all regionals are included for the fumbles n feebles you filthy lying *****

why is there a seperate colum failed again dave?
"Metro+fox" in one column then "Regional" duh retarrrd.
or is it just the NRL double counting their ratings again

leagueiscrap wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

enarelle wrote:

Think you are confusing the NRL with the AFL again. NRL ratings drop per game during SOO because of the focus that SOO brings and top players being unavailable. It is not about the reduced number of games.

But in the end it doesn't matter if the total NRL package is used as reference point.

Oh oh NRL got pants again on Friday night - ememarella is clearly very upset that his widdle NRL is suffering at the TV box - suck it up princess!

Ah right on time ,stupid jumps in .
When the Fri night Regionals are added(av 400K) then we win again.

how about the AFL regionals they are not included as well
NT and regional SA are not even covered in the TV ratings.

:_<> :_<> :_<>
all regionals are included for the fumbles n feebles you filthy lying *****

why is there a seperate colum failed again dave?
"Metro+fox" in one column then "Regional" duh retarrrd.
or is it just the NRL double counting their ratings again

Why not they double count any one who goes to the game!

The ARLC negotiates everything. Are we now trying to use organisational structures to divert the argument? Perhaps I should have said the rugby league package. They are the same players and match officials.

And pants pulled down? When does the nonsense of the 5 capitals end as being used as a basis for comparing codes?

enarelle wrote:

The ARLC negotiates everything. Are we now trying to use organisational structures to divert the argument? Perhaps I should have said the rugby league package. They are the same players and match officials.

And pants pulled down? When does the nonsense of the 5 capitals end as being used as a basis for comparing codes?

Because this is about AUSTRALIA's number one code you idiot! Not Australia and NZ - emenarella perhaps you should stop believing all the propaganda and be objective!!!!

Dear Swans Forever the issue with the 5 city ratings is they don't include the regionals for NSW/QLD/ACT which have a significant impact on the NRL ratings as the Wookie can attest to. This is because around half the NRL supporter base live in these areas.

Quietly confident that Canberra,Townsville,Newcastle,Cairns etc are part of the Australian islands

Think you need to focus a bit more and don't get too paranoid about the reach of the NRL as clearly it distresses you.

Swans4ever wrote:

Why not they double count any one who goes to the game!

How did Birchgrove Oval work out for you?

Swans4ever wrote:

enarelle wrote:

The ARLC negotiates everything. Are we now trying to use organisational structures to divert the argument? Perhaps I should have said the rugby league package. They are the same players and match officials.

And pants pulled down? When does the nonsense of the 5 capitals end as being used as a basis for comparing codes?

Because this is about AUSTRALIA's number one code you idiot! Not Australia and NZ - emenarella perhaps you should stop believing all the propaganda and be objective!!

I realise you fear for the future of your code... but simply enjoy that silver medal while you can. :_<> :_<>

pussycat wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Why not they double count any one who goes to the game!

How did Birchgrove Oval work out for you?

Wasn't that 5 years ago??? Are you forever going to live in the past? You really delude yourself - aside of which why shouldn't there be a footy field at birch grove after all soccer is a business in this country that relies on juniors to prop up its a-league and international teams - I would think that ANYONE would be opposed to a code profiteering on children - but obviously your not!

pussycat wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

enarelle wrote:

The ARLC negotiates everything. Are we now trying to use organisational structures to divert the argument? Perhaps I should have said the rugby league package. They are the same players and match officials.

And pants pulled down? When does the nonsense of the 5 capitals end as being used as a basis for comparing codes?

Because this is about AUSTRALIA's number one code you idiot! Not Australia and NZ - emenarella perhaps you should stop believing all the propaganda and be objective!!

I realise you fear for the future of your code... but simply enjoy that silver medal while you can. :_<> :_<>

You have a strange way of determining who's number one - even Dave Smith admitted your behind but try and keep up
Crowds - AFL
REVENUE - AFL
MEMBERSHIP - AFL
FOOTBALL CLUB REVENUE - AFL
PARTICIPATION - AFL
TV RATINGS - AFL.

Swans4ever wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

enarelle wrote:

The ARLC negotiates everything. Are we now trying to use organisational structures to divert the argument? Perhaps I should have said the rugby league package. They are the same players and match officials.

And pants pulled down? When does the nonsense of the 5 capitals end as being used as a basis for comparing codes?

Because this is about AUSTRALIA's number one code you idiot! Not Australia and NZ - emenarella perhaps you should stop believing all the propaganda and be objective!!

I realise you fear for the future of your code... but simply enjoy that silver medal while you can. :_<> :_<>

You have a strange way of determining who's number one - even Dave Smith admitted your behind but try and keep up
Crowds - AFL
REVENUE - AFL
MEMBERSHIP - AFL
FOOTBALL CLUB REVENUE - AFL
PARTICIPATION - AFL
TV RATINGS - AFL.

add sponsorship in to that as well
but
you can post all of the facts and figures next to each other, as well even their little codes boss david smith came out and said they are behind. & the little bedwetting basement dwellers, like to keep playing their little game of ignoring reality

Thought this was a TV ratings debate thread. Just another case of change the debate/argument when it is going pear shaped.