Page 347 of 852
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 5:39 pm
by AFLcrap1
Xman wrote:The_Wookie wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Say whatever you like.
That is not proof.
Now off you go & show some proof that SOO is an exhibition game.
Origin is not an exhibition game. Exhibition games are like soccer friendlies, pointless and with nothing hanging on the result. Origin is linked to state and national selection, and is part of the representative calendar.
Whether its part of the NRL is another question. Origin was previously run by the ARL, now the ARLC and is budgeted separately according to the annual report for the NRL. However the TV rights sold to the ARLC are all inclusive and are not sold to the NRL, and thus origin cant be excluded from tv rights or ratings discussion.
Which is eactly my point. NRL fans claim SOO is NRL. If it is then why doesnt it affect the NRL competition? By definition it must be an NRL exhibition game then, since this is what exhibition games are
So Wookie has said that SOO is NOT an Exhibition game.
Yet you are still trying to spin it as true.
YOu lied ,You failed to post any proof.
& now you fail to admit it.
I would expect lies are now allowed .
Or is that just a rule for you.
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 6:23 pm
by Xman
AFLcrap1 wrote:Xman wrote:The_Wookie wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Say whatever you like.
That is not proof.
Now off you go & show some proof that SOO is an exhibition game.
Origin is not an exhibition game. Exhibition games are like soccer friendlies, pointless and with nothing hanging on the result. Origin is linked to state and national selection, and is part of the representative calendar.
Whether its part of the NRL is another question. Origin was previously run by the ARL, now the ARLC and is budgeted separately according to the annual report for the NRL. However the TV rights sold to the ARLC are all inclusive and are not sold to the NRL, and thus origin cant be excluded from tv rights or ratings discussion.
Which is eactly my point. NRL fans claim SOO is NRL. If it is then why doesnt it affect the NRL competition? By definition it must be an NRL exhibition game then, since this is what exhibition games are
So Wookie has said that SOO is NOT an Exhibition game.
Yet you are still trying to spin it as true.
YOu lied ,You failed to post any proof.
& now you fail to admit it.
I would expect lies are now allowed .
Or is that just a rule for you.
So is SOO NRL or not?
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:02 pm
by pussycat
Soo is the pick of NRL players playing representative football . Something the AFL tried to do but failed.
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:10 pm
by Xman
pussycat wrote:Soo is the pick of NRL players playing representative football . Something the AFL tried to do but failed.
Incorrect. AUssie Rules SOO was very successful but was superseded by a national competition.
The ARU SOO is 2 Australian states only, so how is it the pick of the NRLs best? Who do kiwis or players from other states play for?
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 11:57 am
by pussycat
But But But - cut out the XMan impersonations - It failed.
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:28 pm
by Xman
pussycat wrote:But But But - cut out the XMan impersonations - It failed.
The only reason the RL SOO continues to succeed is the epic failure of the NRL to expand outside 2 states
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:41 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:pussycat wrote:But But But - cut out the XMan impersonations - It failed.
The only reason the RL SOO continues to succeed is the epic failure of the NRL to expand outside 2 states
We only need the 2 we have to the biggest in the land

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:45 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:pussycat wrote:But But But - cut out the XMan impersonations - It failed.
The only reason the RL SOO continues to succeed is the epic failure of the NRL to expand outside 2 states
We only need the 2 we have to the biggest in the land

At tv audience only, and only because the AFL GF is played out of prime time, and SOO fans are massive bandwagoners
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:46 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:pussycat wrote:Soo is the pick of NRL players playing representative football . Something the AFL tried to do but failed.
Incorrect. AUssie Rules SOO was very successful but?

>

:_<>
But....
Indeed

:_<>
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:49 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:pussycat wrote:But But But - cut out the XMan impersonations - It failed.
The only reason the RL SOO continues to succeed is the epic failure of the NRL to expand outside 2 states
We only need the 2 we have to the biggest in the land

At tv audience only, and only because the AFL GF is played out of peak hour
But but but

:_<>
1
2
3
& if the bunnies can make the big one
4
your bumbling abortion of a sport is 2nd
The proof is now irrefutable

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:46 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:pussycat wrote:But But But - cut out the XMan impersonations - It failed.
The only reason the RL SOO continues to succeed is the epic failure of the NRL to expand outside 2 states
We only need the 2 we have to the biggest in the land

At tv audience only, and only because the AFL GF is played out of peak hour
But but but

:_<>
1
2
3
& if the bunnies can make the big one
4
your bumbling abortion of a sport is 2nd
The proof is now irrefutable

AFL beats NRL fair and square. You guys need to include a separate RL series to claim victory, and even then it's due to scheduling
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 10:43 am
by pussycat
Im not sure how you work that out:?> Even if we only compare the part ARL Commission know as the regular NRL competition - Our free to air matches (head to head) beat yours , our PayTV matches outrate yours.
Maybe you could tell me (in your mind) how you actually beat us.
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 8:21 pm
by Xman
pussycat wrote:Im not sure how you work that out:?> Even if we only compare the part ARL Commission know as the regular NRL competition - Our free to air matches (head to head) beat yours , our PayTV matches outrate yours.
Maybe you could tell me (in your mind) how you actually beat us.
No they don't. Your combined live matches on FN beat our Single matches. For the rest of the weekend you get smashed
Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 10:18 am
by eelofwest
2013 Live 730pm 19/04/13 NZ VS AUS
1.339m + NZ Sky
164,550k
2014 Live 730pm 02/05/14 NZ vs AUS 926kMetro + 650 Regionals + NZ Sky 200k Huge improvement to a Test match that the media say know one cares about.....Media are so full of shit.... :_<>

Re: Fight Club - Football TV Ratings Thread
Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 10:19 am
by pussycat
Ouch,,,,I feel your pain.
Fri TV #NRL Test Match #RoosKiwis Nine 854k (Syd 530k Bri 324k) GEM 72k (Mel 46k Ade 4k Per 22k)
Fri NZ TV: #NRL Test Match #RoosKiwis SkySport2 200k (10pm start in NZ)
Fri TV #AFL #AFLBluesPies Seven 582k (Mel 476k Ade 106k) 7mate 147k (Syd 35k Bri 23k Per 88k)