Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Its part of the NRL REP season .
So yes you lied.
Unless you can provide proof that they are Exhibition games.

How does it impact the NRL season?

Stop deflecting .
You claimed SOO is an exhibition game .
Provide proof please.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman .
You lied.
Show me proof that the yearlySOO games are exhibition games .
.
Proof please.

You have to excuse him, hes got a very saw butt at the moment :_<>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Its part of the NRL REP season .
So yes you lied.
Unless you can provide proof that they are Exhibition games.

How does it impact the NRL season?

Stop deflecting .
You claimed SOO is an exhibition game .
Provide proof please.

If its part of the NRL then it is

@MediaweekAUS: Sun STV #AFL #AFLPowerCats 251k #AFLDogsCrows 168k #AFLTigersHawks 118k #FoxFooty #FoxSports

@MediaweekAUS: Sun STV #NRL #NRLManCan 186k #FoxSports

Ouch for the NRL. A game in isolation smashed by the AFLs concurrent games

@MediaweekAUS: Sun TV #AFL Arvo Seven 475k (Mel 264k Ade 152k Per 60k) 7mate 58k (Syd 31k Bri 27k)

@MediaweekAUS: Sun TV #NRL Nine 436k (Syd 285k Bri 151k) GEM 11k (Mel 5k Per 6k) + Ade late 1k

Another easy win to the AFL on Sunday.

Woahhhh, 5k for Melbourne!

NRL regionals are another 75% on top of the Metro ratings on Sunday over the course of the year. AFL ratings are about 20% - and even then we only know that from two blockbuster games. Celebrating stuff like this is borederline ********.

Actual ratings


Estimated ratings (+75% for NRL Sunday, sky ratings, +20% for AFL games, +55k for Tasmania)


What is worth celebrating is that the ANZAC Day game between Essendon and Collingwood was the highest rating game of the season in either code - and by a fair margin when both codes regionals are counted.

Actual ratings


All ratings including above estimates

Im very impressed - youve beat a 1 hour delayed game by 100k =D> =D> =D>

pussycat wrote:

Im very impressed - youve beat a 1 hour delayed game by 100k =D> =D> =D>

And against another game rating over 100k on foxtel :>::

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Its part of the NRL REP season .
So yes you lied.
Unless you can provide proof that they are Exhibition games.

How does it impact the NRL season?

Stop deflecting .
You claimed SOO is an exhibition game .
Provide proof please.

If its part of the NRL then it is

Prove what you claimed..
Its a simple rule all posters have to abide by.
You made a claim & have so far not shown one bit of evidence to back it up .
Makes you a liar.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Its part of the NRL REP season .
So yes you lied.
Unless you can provide proof that they are Exhibition games.

How does it impact the NRL season?

Stop deflecting .
You claimed SOO is an exhibition game .
Provide proof please.

If its part of the NRL then it is

Prove what you claimed..
Its a simple rule all posters have to abide by.
You made a claim & have so far not shown one bit of evidence to back it up .
Makes you a liar.

As I have said, the definition of an exhibition game is one that has no baring on the actual competition. So, if you claim its an NRL game then by definition its an exhibition

Say whatever you like.
That is not proof.

Now off you go & show some proof that SOO is an exhibition game.

The_Wookie wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Say whatever you like.
That is not proof.

Now off you go & show some proof that SOO is an exhibition game.

Origin is not an exhibition game. Exhibition games are like soccer friendlies, pointless and with nothing hanging on the result. Origin is linked to state and national selection, and is part of the representative calendar.

Whether its part of the NRL is another question. Origin was previously run by the ARL, now the ARLC and is budgeted separately according to the annual report for the NRL. However the TV rights sold to the ARLC are all inclusive and are not sold to the NRL, and thus origin cant be excluded from tv rights or ratings discussion.

Which is eactly my point. NRL fans claim SOO is NRL. If it is then why doesnt it affect the NRL competition? By definition it must be an NRL exhibition game then, since this is what exhibition games are

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Im very impressed - youve beat a 1 hour delayed game by 100k =D> =D> =D>

And against another game rating over 100k on foxtel :>::

Another But But excuse. If you look at the NRL guide you will see that the1 hour delayed game is overlapped by the Fox game that rated almost 200k. but but but.

AFL still kicks nrl butt in the ratings ... No matter how you try and spin it or manipulate it

Phelpsy wrote:

AFL still kicks nrl butt in the ratings ... No matter how you try and spin it or manipulate it

I've noticed

pussycat wrote:

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Im very impressed - youve beat a 1 hour delayed game by 100k =D> =D> =D>

And against another game rating over 100k on foxtel :>::

Another But But excuse. If you look at the NRL guide you will see that the1 hour delayed game is overlapped by the Fox game that rated almost 200k. but but but.

I highly doubt it. They make every effort to ensure their telecasts are isolated

http://www.nrl.com/DrawResults/TelstraP ... fault.aspx
Actually you're wrong. The 2pm live game didn't overlap the 3pm game shown on FTA at 4pm