Talking Footy

The_Wookie wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:37 pm

Actually I post ANY Industry related - that is specifically crowds, memberships, sponsorship, financials, CBA's, expansions, participation figures, tv ratings - stories from ALL codes. Its in the title of the fucking website you half wit. - its what happens OFF the field in australian football.

And on the rare occasion i do write, its on these subjects. See this week

- I wrote about AFLX and its brief history - relevant to the news of the day.
- I noted State of Origin crowds and ratings and compared them solely to previous ones.
- I wrote about AFL CBA as a summary of everything else written about the AFL CBA. Ill do the same if the NRL is ever signed.
- and two general news posts with headlines for all codes about various industry matters.


I dont write or post about the on field events, nor do i write about medical shit.

And thats why there was fucking silence.

Further proof you have no fucking idea what you are on about. You arent the man to help, you're the man who needs a fucking lobotomy.


"you're the man who needs a fucking lobotomy." This from the site administrator........incredible. By the sounds of this and past post's you've already had one.....lolololololololo.o.oollllolololol. Half a brain Wookie.....makes sense.....lolololololololololol.

Fred wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:55 am

So Australian rules so far the most watched sport in Australia. With 1 origin to come should be a close season.

Terry wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 10:01 am

Fred wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:55 am

So Australian rules so far the most watched sport in Australia. With 1 origin to come should be a close season.

So you strike out NZ ratings to get your manufactured result and don't mention the number of games the numbers come from. So again - FB is counting 40 more games, yep 40. Once RL catches up on this number the result will be inevitable. RL again!!!!!!

pussycat wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:12 pm

NlolRL There is a big difference between reasonable facts and your laughable excuses.

Doesn't it make sense to you that to determine who has the most ratings you have to count all ratings? Not just the ones that you would like to count.???

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:47 pm

pussycat wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:12 pm

NlolRL There is a big difference between reasonable facts and your laughable excuses.

Doesn't it make sense to you that to determine who has the most ratings you have to count all ratings? Not just the ones that you would like to count.???

That would make perfect sense IF all games were shown in the same way, but they aren't. The best we have is one game v one game shown at the same time. Over a whole season there'd be close to 30 of these, which is more that enough to show which code has the bigger audience

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:52 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:47 pm

pussycat wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:12 pm

NlolRL There is a big difference between reasonable facts and your laughable excuses.

Doesn't it make sense to you that to determine who has the most ratings you have to count all ratings? Not just the ones that you would like to count.???

That would make perfect sense IF all games were shown in the same way, but they aren't. The best we have is one game v one game shown at the same time. Over a whole season there'd be close to 30 of these, which is more that enough to show which code has the bigger audience

the AFL schedule this way for a reason, they find it is the best way to MAXIMISE there figures..
maybe you should Email the AFL and get them to not show games that overlap

like to see there reply and reasoning behind it.

cannot do just 1 game v 1 game on a particular night, to find the outcome of who is more popular..

pussycat wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 7:34 pm

We are talking about two different organisations each trying to get as many viewers /ratings as possible. All you have NlolRL is club football. That is your season. That's not the case with a Rugby League Season. The past two weeks have been a perfect example. Last Friday our bottom teams played. That's never going to happen in the AFL of a Friday night. The week before, a game shown in title isolation 3.5m but the screams and squeals I got when I tried to compare it to your Thursday game played under the exact same conditions.

The AFL sell 4 matches for broadcast to Ch7 each round. Saturday night is one of those matches. Although the match might be split into 2 and shown into different regions to maximise its ratings it is just 1 match. The AFL may lose a few ratings from PTV viewers by doing it this way (maybe) but they more then make up for it by maximising there ratings from FTA viewers.

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 4:54 pm

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:52 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:47 pm

That would make perfect sense IF all games were shown in the same way, but they aren't. The best we have is one game v one game shown at the same time. Over a whole season there'd be close to 30 of these, which is more that enough to show which code has the bigger audience

the AFL schedule this way for a reason, they find it is the best way to MAXIMISE there figures..
maybe you should Email the AFL and get them to not show games that overlap

like to see there reply and reasoning behind it.

cannot do just 1 game v 1 game on a particular night, to find the outcome of who is more popular..

Of course they do it for a reason. But that reason is to maximise viewers per time slot, not per game. For example even a poor AFL game shown in isolation on saturday night wpuld get 800k, yet two cracking games shown concurrently would only get 1200 max. Per game it loses, but per time slot its a winner.

Yet on here people only want to compare per game which clealy doesnt do the AFLs scheduling any favours.

Tell me why a game v game comparison doesnt work when in also includes some Thursday, Monday and anzac day games?

Terry wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:11 pm

Oh dear!!!! Pal, please don't do this to yourself. This argument has also been won and lost and you were on the wrong side of that ledger as well. Please move on. You have plenty to crow about just not last years ratings and your 1 V 1 and isolation theories.......they are flawed and have been debunked by everyone.

For your own health please move on to your strengths.

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:21 pm

Terry wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:11 pm

Oh dear!!!! Pal, please don't do this to yourself. This argument has also been won and lost and you were on the wrong side of that ledger as well. Please move on. You have plenty to crow about just not last years ratings and your 1 V 1 and isolation theories.......they are flawed and have been debunked by everyone.

For your own health please move on to your strengths.

either put up an opposing argument or STFU dickhead

Terry wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:47 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:21 pm

Terry wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:11 pm

Oh dear!!!! Pal, please don't do this to yourself. This argument has also been won and lost and you were on the wrong side of that ledger as well. Please move on. You have plenty to crow about just not last years ratings and your 1 V 1 and isolation theories.......they are flawed and have been debunked by everyone.

For your own health please move on to your strengths.

either put up an opposing argument or STFU dickhead

Dear oh dear!!! This argument has been around the goldfish bowl and in and out of the jungle so many times it's pointless going around again. Wow!!!!! You must love the jungle.....lolololololol.

Please refer to the many, many, many previous post's by multiple posters refuting, debunking and dismissing your 'stuff' my good man. I wish you no ill will. All the best to you and yours and Gods speed.

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:53 pm

Terry wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:47 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:21 pm

either put up an opposing argument or STFU dickhead

Dear oh dear!!! This argument has been around the goldfish bowl and in and out of the jungle so many times it's pointless going around again. Wow!!!!! You must love the jungle.....lolololololol.

Please refer to the many, many, many previous post's by multiple posters refuting, debunking and dismissing your 'stuff' my good man. I wish you no ill will. All the best to you and yours and Gods speed.

I dont think youve made a single constructive argument on this forum