Talking Footy

Terry wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2017 3:27 pm

The_Wookie wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:48 pm

there'll be at least two broadcast games for the AFL during the bye round - the legends game and the AFLW Origin game

So here we go - this is becoming a joke!!! So you're going to add the ratings of old men and a low standard women's game? Aren't we supposed to be comparing ratings for the elite levels of the games?

You have already added millions of ratings for preseason games and women's rubbish and now you want more rubbish. If you're gonna play that game you had better start adding ratings for all Holden Cup, Qld cup, Super League, World Club Challenge, Intrust Super cup and anything other RL games that are broadcast in Australia. That might go somewhere to bridging the 49 game advantage you fumblers already have.

And yes add your fumbling state games that are broadcast and anything else just to make more work for Wookie.

This is becoming farcial.

The RL folk here have always argued around RL being most watched - focusing on the code on TV not the NRL - therefore including Origin and internationals and AllStar games.

AFLW is Origin for Women - happy for that to be included.

I do see Terry's point re: the Legends game - but also if we are just talking about code and not competition it is an aussie rules game being shown on TV.

I think putting state leagues in is a good idea too - I know the SANFL and VFL rate okay in their states. Not sure re: WAFL or TAFL? Then you have the NEAFL shown on SBS I think (indigenous channel). The thing is you have to draw the lines - either compare competitions or compare codes. You can't pick and choose which game is okay and which is not if your argument is most watched code on TV just to suite your agenda.

Fred wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:29 pm

Yes, if the average for each game was indeed 180000, that is exactly what it is - an average. They would have arrived at the 180000 average by totalling to total viewers and dividing by number of games. I'm happy with that. If that puts RL in front then fine, I'm happy with that too. Just want correct figures.

Fred , I the posted the figure a few posts back, 5.4m. Well done Fred, I new you were a leaguie at heart. Thanks for that Fred that's a great win you gotten for us, it looked like going right down to the wire but your persistence has paid off big time.

pussycat wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:59 pm

Fred wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:29 pm

Yes, if the average for each game was indeed 180000, that is exactly what it is - an average. They would have arrived at the 180000 average by totalling to total viewers and dividing by number of games. I'm happy with that. If that puts RL in front then fine, I'm happy with that too. Just want correct figures.

Fred , I the posted the figure a few posts back, 5.4m. Well done Fred, I new you were a leaguie at heart. Thanks for that Fred that's a great win you gotten for us, it looked like going right down to the wire but your persistence has paid off big time. =D>

Oh my. Yes... 5 and a half million watched the 9s.

Or.... was it that fox just gave the average viewership for the event that day ....... as Leroy pointed out maybe low in morning and high during the day? Hmmmmm interesting.

1st match had 100k viewers, ,2nd match 300k, 3rd match may have been 200k viewers...................But in the end the match average was 180.

So was there 30 matches as your earlier posts said or just 1event as your last post said?

Fred is tying himself up in knots to try and manufacture a FB win in any way he can. His idiocy is making this thread irrelevant. We may as well forget about ratings - Fred has turned it into a joke.

Terry wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 11:14 am

Fred is tying himself up in knots to try and manufacture a FB win in any way he can. His idiocy is making this thread irrelevant. We may as well forget about ratings - Fred has turned it into a joke.

And LOL who only wants to count Friday nights. These AFL followers are a desperate lot, though I suppose that's what happens when you lose all the time.

Terry wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 11:14 am

Fred is tying himself up in knots to try and manufacture a FB win in any way he can. His idiocy is making this thread irrelevant. We may as well forget about ratings - Fred has turned it into a joke.

Mwah .

pussycat wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:05 pm

Terry wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 11:14 am

Fred is tying himself up in knots to try and manufacture a FB win in any way he can. His idiocy is making this thread irrelevant. We may as well forget about ratings - Fred has turned it into a joke.

And LOL who only wants to count Friday nights. These AFL followers are a desperate lot, though I suppose that's what happens when you lose all the time.

Wrong. My comparison is every single game v single game which includes Thursdays Fridays and public holidays

Another NRL game failed to hit 1mil last night despite involving the broncos

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:44 pm

pussycat wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:05 pm

Terry wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 11:14 am

Fred is tying himself up in knots to try and manufacture a FB win in any way he can. His idiocy is making this thread irrelevant. We may as well forget about ratings - Fred has turned it into a joke.

And LOL who only wants to count Friday nights. These AFL followers are a desperate lot, though I suppose that's what happens when you lose all the time.

Wrong. My comparison is every single game v single game which includes Thursdays Fridays and public holidays

Another NRL game failed to hit 1mil last night despite involving the broncos

Though it doesn't Include Wednesday and it does it include tests doesn't include opening matches. Nor does it allow for the fact that were missing our best players 34+ for 10 weeks. It doesn't allow for the fact that your worst rating sides don't get a start in these time slots. So Basically your best matches up against whatever we have on that night.

pussycat wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:16 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:44 pm

pussycat wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:05 pm

And LOL who only wants to count Friday nights. These AFL followers are a desperate lot, though I suppose that's what happens when you lose all the time.

Wrong. My comparison is every single game v single game which includes Thursdays Fridays and public holidays

Another NRL game failed to hit 1mil last night despite involving the broncos

Though it doesn't Include Wednesday and it does it include tests doesn't include opening matches. Nor does it allow for the fact that were missing our best players 34+ for 10 weeks. It doesn't allow for the fact that your worst rating sides don't get a start in these time slots. So Basically your best matches up against whatever we have on that night.

it's a comparison of games shown against each other so how in the fuck can we include SOO or your early season games prior to the AFL's season starting?

As for your 34 players missing for 10 weeks, I call bullshit! If that's the case your best players miss almost half the season to play 3 games of SOO. You honestly expect us to believe that shit?

For the last 5 rounds the Broncos again play in 3 FN's, all to maximise ratings. Dont give me this BS that the NRL dont put their best teams on FN more often.

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:24 pm

pussycat wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:16 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:44 pm

Wrong. My comparison is every single game v single game which includes Thursdays Fridays and public holidays

Another NRL game failed to hit 1mil last night despite involving the broncos

Though it doesn't Include Wednesday and it does it include tests doesn't include opening matches. Nor does it allow for the fact that were missing our best players 34+ for 10 weeks. It doesn't allow for the fact that your worst rating sides don't get a start in these time slots. So Basically your best matches up against whatever we have on that night.

it's a comparison of games shown against each other so how in the fuck can we include SOO or your early season games prior to the AFL's season starting?

As for your 34 players missing for 10 weeks, I call bullshit! If that's the case your best players miss almost half the season to play 3 games of SOO. You honestly expect us to believe that shit?

For the last 5 rounds the Broncos again play in 3 FN's, all to maximise ratings. Dont give me this BS that the NRL dont put their best teams on FN more often.

lol got nothing, typical =D>

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:24 pm

pussycat wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:16 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:44 pm

Wrong. My comparison is every single game v single game which includes Thursdays Fridays and public holidays

Another NRL game failed to hit 1mil last night despite involving the broncos

Though it doesn't Include Wednesday and it does it include tests doesn't include opening matches. Nor does it allow for the fact that were missing our best players 34+ for 10 weeks. It doesn't allow for the fact that your worst rating sides don't get a start in these time slots. So Basically your best matches up against whatever we have on that night.

it's a comparison of games shown against each other so how in the fuck can we include SOO or your early season games prior to the AFL's season starting?

As for your 34 players missing for 10 weeks, I call bullshit! If that's the case your best players miss almost half the season to play 3 games of SOO. You honestly expect us to believe that shit?

For the last 5 rounds the Broncos again play in 3 FN's, all to maximise ratings. Dont give me this BS that the NRL dont put their best teams on FN more often.

Stop saying NRL

The networks choose the games to be aired in the timeslots.
changes 2018

the scheduling is $hithouse...

any NRL FAN will tell you that..

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:37 pm

NlolRL wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:24 pm

pussycat wrote: Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:16 pm

Though it doesn't Include Wednesday and it does it include tests doesn't include opening matches. Nor does it allow for the fact that were missing our best players 34+ for 10 weeks. It doesn't allow for the fact that your worst rating sides don't get a start in these time slots. So Basically your best matches up against whatever we have on that night.

it's a comparison of games shown against each other so how in the fuck can we include SOO or your early season games prior to the AFL's season starting?

As for your 34 players missing for 10 weeks, I call bullshit! If that's the case your best players miss almost half the season to play 3 games of SOO. You honestly expect us to believe that shit?

For the last 5 rounds the Broncos again play in 3 FN's, all to maximise ratings. Dont give me this BS that the NRL dont put their best teams on FN more often.

Stop saying NRL

The networks choose the games to be aired in the timeslots.
changes 2018

the scheduling is $hithouse...

any NRL FAN will tell you that..

well it is the NRL because they gave control of the scheduling to 9 for more money. Thats why 9 schedule the Broncos on FTA prime time almost every single week. Yet pussy tells me your FTA games arent your best games. Well they are designed that way for ratings anyway.

Do you agree with pussy that 10 of your rounds are destroyed by SOO? If so, that's completely farcical