2017 - NRL - Rugby League TV Ratings

[Fred]

Once again into the goldfish bowl we go. The 9,s have repeatedly been explained to you and also you have been slapped down by wookie re same.

Please read previous posts. Print them and also put them on the fridge. Then refer back to your fridge. Thanks.

An opinion has been put forth on 9s but I disagree. It was over 30 games. How many times do I have to explain it to you?

the 9's was over 2 days.

was played on Saturday AUS time from 10:30am onwards
and Sunday from 8:30am onwards..

so not ideal timing..
also FOX just AVG out the days of each.
being as they are only 18min games...

Yep... so either you include the nines format and all it entails (30 or so short games) or you leave it off all together.

[leeroy*NRL*]

An opinion has been put forth on 9s but I disagree. It was over 30 games. How many times do I have to explain it to you?

the 9's was over 2 days.

was played on Saturday AUS time from 10:30am onwards
and Sunday from 8:30am onwards..

so not ideal timing..
also FOX just AVG out the days of each.
being as they are only 18min games...

Yep... so either you include the nines format and all it entails (30 or so short games) or you leave it off all together.

well I don't think FOX had averages per game,
as it would of changed throughout the day.
being early morning >> to afternoon...

AVGS would been low during the morning and picked up..
so I am guessing to hold around the 200k per day for the whole day
is pretty good.

either way I don't care if its not added to the list either..

[pussycat]

An opinion has been put forth on 9s but I disagree. It was over 30 games. How many times do I have to explain it to you?

the 9's was over 2 days.

was played on Saturday AUS time from 10:30am onwards
and Sunday from 8:30am onwards..

so not ideal timing..
also FOX just AVG out the days of each.
being as they are only 18min games...

Yep... so either you include the nines format and all it entails (30 or so short games) or you leave it off all together.

If we haven't got rating for 30 teams why would we include 30 teams?

[NlolRL]

Thr AFL have basically won every round's total, and are ahead in Australia even after SOO is finished. With 6 or so rounds to go plus finals I think we'll win quite easily form here. Of course we are cuurently 16 - 4 up in game v game comparisons which is a smashing in anyone's language

I think you are forgetting a few things..

last 5 rounds of NRL
Saturday FTA GAME
meaning there is 4 FTA GAMES each week to round out the year..

AFL win each round mostly because
they have more FTA games
and an extra game..

Yes i did forget about your FTA games on saturday over the last 5 rounds. That'll make it interesting. The reason we have won just about every round is the same reason we are 16-4 up on head to head games, and the reasin we have significantly more games over 1mil. We rate more on a like for like comparison

[Fred]

But you need to divide the ratings by the number of matches that day to get an average audience.

[Fred]

where they get the 15.5 from is

for example.

Collingwood v Hawthorn...

You get supporters from both sides watching the match and neturals as well..

what the disadvantage is with Warriors is..

if Warriors v Canterbury..

you get Canterbury Fans and some neturals..
you miss the other fans support base tuning into that match..

"just wanted to clear that matter up"

Oh my. Explain to me how people watching in nz impacts on how many people are watching on tv in Australia? Sure, there are people watching in nz but they are not in Australia. It's really not that hard. There are 8 games shown on Australian TV and we want to know how many people in Australia are watching. If you want to argue how many people are watching in general that's another discussion.

Oh My indeed...

I'm not arguing how nz impacts on Aus tv audiences.


I am stating the disadvantage by having the warriors..

I don't care if we do not add in NZ FIGURES..

I am just stating the disadvantage..

as stated above...

HAWKS V PIES>> get both fans bases in Australia

Canterbury v Warriors >>> only get 1 fan base in Australia.. (there is the disadvantage.)))


gee FRED you must not of read my comment properly...

I do not like explaining myself twice...

I'm hearing you Leroy. Agreed on point above. This has nothing to do with how many watching in Australia as you state. Two different questions.

[Terry]

Thr AFL have basically won every round's total, and are ahead in Australia even after SOO is finished. With 6 or so rounds to go plus finals I think we'll win quite easily form here. Of course we are cuurently 16 - 4 up in game v game comparisons which is a smashing in anyone's language

I think you are forgetting a few things..

last 5 rounds of NRL
Saturday FTA GAME
meaning there is 4 FTA GAMES each week to round out the year..

AFL win each round mostly because
they have more FTA games
and an extra game..

Yes i did forget about your FTA games on saturday over the last 5 rounds. That'll make it interesting. The reason we have won just about every round is the same reason we are 16-4 up on head to head games, and the reasin we have significantly more games over 1mil. We rate more on a like for like comparison

And what about the bye round before the finals when the fumblers go home to their mammas to rest up after a hard years fumbling. There's another 4 mill. plus for RL and nil for fumbling.

[leeroy*NRL*]

for the sake of the argument

I would be happy for Wookie to just drop the NZ ratings and not count it in the list...

[Terry]

there'll be at least two broadcast games for the AFL during the bye round - the legends game and the AFLW Origin game

So here we go - this is becoming a joke!!! So you're going to add the ratings of old men and a low standard women's game? Aren't we supposed to be comparing ratings for the elite levels of the games?

You have already added millions of ratings for preseason games and women's rubbish and now you want more rubbish. If you're gonna play that game you had better start adding ratings for all Holden Cup, Qld cup, Super League, World Club Challenge, Intrust Super cup and anything other RL games that are broadcast in Australia. That might go somewhere to bridging the 49 game advantage you fumblers already have.

And yes add your fumbling state games that are broadcast and anything else just to make more work for Wookie.

This is becoming farcial.

[pussycat]

But you need to divide the ratings by the number of matches that day to get an average audience.

The average for Saturday was 181k. Therefore the average for each match must of been 181k. You claimed ther was 30 matches played. So that would return ratings of 181 thousand x 30 = 5.4m which would put Rugby League a couple of million in front................ but but but.

[Terry]

But you need to divide the ratings by the number of matches that day to get an average audience.

The average for Saturday was 181k. Therefore the average for each match must of been 181k. You claimed ther was 30 matches played. So that would return ratings of 181 thousand x 30 = 5.4m which would put Rugby League a couple of million in front................ but but but.

Yeah ya right. Better add those 5.4 mill in Wookie. Thanks for pointing that out Fred.

[Fred]

Lol

[leeroy*NRL*]

HAHAHA

[AFLcrap1]

Fred just doesn't get it
If. The average over the 2 days for 30. Games was 180k
That means EACH GAME averaged that .
It's bizarre how thick fumblers can be

[Fred]

Yes, if the average for each game was indeed 180000, that is exactly what it is - an average. They would have arrived at the 180000 average by totalling to total viewers and dividing by number of games. I'm happy with that. If that puts RL in front then fine, I'm happy with that too. Just want correct figures.