Page 32 of 70
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:27 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I'll get some more, I know there was a world record transfer fee paid to a RL player years ago that squashed anything Soccer had at the time.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:30 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:NSWAFL wrote:Still nothing from the 19th century! It's all 20th century!
1900 is the last year of the 19th century F wit
you have been proven wrong.................. again
Xman
I suggest people who call out posters .. that then prove their claim as Parra has
need to be given a 24 hr ban as
A) punishment for suggestions a poster is lying
B) incentive for a poster to provide evidence .. at the moment there is none , why should we prove what we claim when mongs like NSWAFL then just do these ...
this needs to be put in to place
ASAP
lets go.........
Ahhhh, no.
If you make a claim as fact be prepared to back it up. That's your duty for claiming it.
oh really ... rod for ones back much
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:38 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:
1900 is the last year of the 19th century F wit
you have been proven wrong.................. again
Xman
I suggest people who call out posters .. that then prove their claim as Parra has
need to be given a 24 hr ban as
A) punishment for suggestions a poster is lying
B) incentive for a poster to provide evidence .. at the moment there is none , why should we prove what we claim when mongs like NSWAFL then just do these ...
this needs to be put in to place
ASAP
lets go.........
Ahhhh, no.
If you make a claim as fact be prepared to back it up. That's your duty for claiming it.
oh really ... rod for ones back much
I can take it. I know you'll struggle!
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:51 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
1921 - Harold Buck becomes the game’s first £1,000 transfer when he moves from Hunslet to Leeds. Featherstone Rovers become a professional team.
http://www.napit.co.uk/viewus/infobank/ ... istory.php
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:26 pm
by Raiderdave
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Bahahahaha, I'm going to make xwoman eat his words, I just fired off an email. I will post the proof when I get a reply or if I find it sooner.
So get ******.
Oh, and read this, you'll like it as it shows RL is and never was as racist as AR.
http://makingthenut.com/content/class-betrayal
what a great Read Parra
it typifies why we are proud of our game .. its heritage .. its history
great stuff. =D> =D> =D>
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:34 pm
by NSWAFL
Still nothing from the 19th century, Parra?
You're in big trouble, mister!
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:59 pm
by cos789
Why worry NSWAFL, parafeel is totally living in the past .
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:11 pm
by NSWAFL
Scroll down the page and you'll see 1800 mentioned in the details, and no sign of 1900.
I've added a fact tag to the claim, and I expect it to be changed to 1800 to 1899 unless a citation is added.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:23 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:
Still nothing from the 19th century, Parra?
You're in big trouble, mister!
Am I
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:24 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
cos789 wrote:Why worry NSWAFL, parafeel is totally living in the past .
Yes yes, that's why I put in last weekends results from one of our many comps, but you still can't do it.
Poor poor peeping tom, still looking in windows for ratings boxes?
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:00 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:NSWAFL wrote:
Still nothing from the 19th century, Parra?
You're in big trouble, mister!
Am I
Yep. You made a claim about Rugby League players being professional in the 19th century and you haven't produced any evidence of it when challenged.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:51 am
by ParraEelsNRL
18th century?
Post what I said and stop lying.
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:56 am
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:
No one was being paid to play sport in the 19th century you goose! Prove they were!
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Derp, in the early days, guys made more money playing RL than soccer.
Where did I mention the 18th century fella?
As you can see, I said in the early days of Rugby League, Rugby League didn't start till 1895, so how in the hell can you think I meant some time before it existed, answer that one?
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:58 am
by ParraEelsNRL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:NSWAFL wrote:No one was being paid to play sport in the 19th century you goose! Prove they were!
Derp, in the early days, guys made more money playing RL than soccer.
Just in case you think I'm lying
Re: International AFL vs International RL
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 8:35 am
by NSWAFL
1895 is the 19th century. Prove they were paid then. That is what I meant, and deep down you know it.