Talking Footy

Posted: **Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:53 am**

pussycat wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:46 am

NlolRL wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:28 am

pussycat wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:56 am
Maybe not the Thriller from Manila but a real nail bitter at the MCG last night.
What do expect for a top 3 team vs last?

It rated it's socks off though, plus 85k at the ground
The same old shit pile in the end though - followed by a silver medal presentation

When you get over 1.2mil rating and 85k at a home and away game come back to me $:\:$

Posted: **Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:08 am**

Haha, I thought you were talking about the brawl last night when you said the thriller from Manilla.

Posted: **Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:19 pm**

pussycat wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:46 am

NlolRL wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:28 am

pussycat wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:56 am
Maybe not the Thriller from Manila but a real nail bitter at the MCG last night.
What do expect for a top 3 team vs last?

It rated it's socks off though, plus 85k at the ground
The same old shit pile in the end though - followed by a silver medal presentation

In your little world pissy cat
When your own little code is being flogged rating & 70k morenpeople turn up to the game after paying a premium for a seat as to the nrlol bargain bin prices!

Pat your self on the back and collect the fools gold
Medal and go and pin it on the wall! But be careful not to tear the tin foil as it will let reality in!

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:50 am**

Rant .
Repeat
Rant
Repeat
Rant
Repeat
Rant
Repeat

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 4:14 am**

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:50 am
Rant .
Repeat
Rant
Repeat
Rant
Repeat
Rant
Repeat

But nrlol is more popular and most watched is the usual cry from you loons

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:02 am**

Oh dear .
RL was the most watched sport last year . Had more viewers by a long way than afl..
That's reality .
In your strange little world you live in that's not real .
Gold medal ..

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:39 am**

Crap, that's not reality.
Please, prove the Oztam extrapolation is real.

Reality is, all those "viewers" for the year is really about 40000 logs on oztam box's from a national panel of 8500.

It's that not the reality of it crap?

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:23 am**

Media companies outlay billions $$$$ on these rating results so yeh that's enough for me .

Poor sporty ...but but but but but

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:24 am**

SportCapital wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:39 am
Crap, that's not reality.
Please, prove the Oztam extrapolation is real.

Reality is, all those "viewers" for the year is really about 40000 logs on oztam box's from a national panel of 8500.

It's that not the reality of it crap?

Typical, Lone voice in the jungle. Proof , Proof, Proof

. Did you pick that up from Lol ? When faced with reality he usually asks for proof.

The sun come up in the East this morning

prove it. Ooh its hot ...Prove it

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:13 am**

pussycat wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:24 am

SportCapital wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:39 am
Crap, that's not reality.
Please, prove the Oztam extrapolation is real.

Reality is, all those "viewers" for the year is really about 40000 logs on oztam box's from a national panel of 8500.

It's that not the reality of it crap?

Typical, Lone voice in the jungle. Proof , Proof, Proof . Did you pick that up from Lol ? When faced with reality he usually asks for proof.

The sun come up in the East this morning prove it. Ooh its hot ...Prove it

which is funny because when you make claims they always lack proof....

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:42 am**

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:23 am
Media companies outlay billions $$$$ on these rating results so yeh that's enough for me .

Poor sporty ...but but but but but

So, no. There's no actual proof.

But when you break it down further.
The reality of it is even less convincing as a credible source due to its inherent margin for error.

This is the reality crap.

Of a million "views" for a night it's really about 330 logs on an Oztam box.
So of the 8500 national panel 330 tuned in to the NRL for the night.
I'm going to say it's probably those same 330 or there abouts tuning in to the NRL most of the time.
All year.

I truely pity you lot, having to hang your hat on the viewing habits of a few hundred households.

So, moving forward, I'm very happy to continue to remind everyone here the reality.

Hope you don't mind.
After all, it's the truth of the matter crap. Is it not?

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:27 pm**

Nope
Ratings are the most accurate measure of tv viewing that we have .
Just because fumbles comes a poor second ...you turn into the usual afl nutjob .
You just can't accept reality ....so you try to but but but ...or explain it away .

Please tell me why mediacompanies outlay so much money if the ratings are inaccurate or are not convincing .
Lol
Thisll be good .

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:28 pm**

NlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:13 am

pussycat wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:24 am

SportCapital wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:39 am
Crap, that's not reality.
Please, prove the Oztam extrapolation is real.

Reality is, all those "viewers" for the year is really about 40000 logs on oztam box's from a national panel of 8500.

It's that not the reality of it crap?

Typical, Lone voice in the jungle. Proof , Proof, Proof . Did you pick that up from Lol ? When faced with reality he usually asks for proof.

The sun come up in the East this morning prove it. Ooh its hot ...Prove it
which is funny because when you make claims they always lack proof....

hey rat boy. You found out who tamblings parents are yet?

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:30 pm**

SportCapital wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:42 am

AFLcrap1 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:23 am
Media companies outlay billions $$$$ on these rating results so yeh that's enough for me .

Poor sporty ...but but but but but
So, no. There's no actual proof.

But when you break it down further.
The reality of it is even less convincing as a credible source due to its inherent margin for error.

This is the reality crap.

Of a million "views" for a night it's really about 330 logs on an Oztam box.
So of the 8500 national panel 330 tuned in to the NRL for the night.
I'm going to say it's probably those same 330 or there abouts tuning in to the NRL most of the time.
All year.

I truely pity you lot, having to hang your hat on the viewing habits of a few hundred households.

So, moving forward, I'm very happy to continue to remind everyone here the reality.

Hope you don't mind.
After all, it's the truth of the matter crap. Is it not?

I haven’t been following this discussion but are you actually trying to suggest there’s little statistical significance in the OzTAM box ratings?

Posted: **Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:36 pm**

King-Eliagh wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:28 pm

NlolRL wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:13 am

pussycat wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:24 am

Typical, Lone voice in the jungle. Proof , Proof, Proof . Did you pick that up from Lol ? When faced with reality he usually asks for proof.

The sun come up in the East this morning prove it. Ooh its hot ...Prove it
which is funny because when you make claims they always lack proof....
hey rat boy. You found out who tamblings parents are yet?

Dad was an Eskimo and Mum was a fluffy rabbit

Talking Footy

Afl Friday night FIZZER!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!

Re: Afl Friday night Fizzer!