




As for your second point, I already said that before
Please come up with something substantial in ur next post docker or I'll be asking that wookie reprimand you!King-Eliagh wrote:Look I'm not saying maddi is some innocent angel in all this



Please come up with something substantial in ur next post docker or I'll be asking that wookie reprimand you!King-Eliagh wrote:Look I'm not saying maddi is some innocent angel in all this
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Don't twist what you said and go on about her, you said "if these senior execs were so innocent" first, I was just pointing out your bullshit.King-Eliagh wrote: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:27 pmyeah riiiiiiight you see middle aged office clarks with hot young uns everywhere!
![]()
![]()
common now docker, surely you got more than that?
![]()
As for your second point, I already said that before
Please come up with something substantial in ur next post docker or I'll be asking that wookie reprimand you!King-Eliagh wrote:Look I'm not saying maddi is some innocent angel in all this
![]()
![]()
![]()
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
In other words Ol dock for brains is trying to say "move along now, nothing to see here"docker24 wrote: Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:27 amKE you suck at trolling...really.
And this is another pointless thread created by you. How many is that now?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Ah wookster, finally you post something worthy of debate. Well done!The_Wookie wrote: Wed Jul 19, 2017 12:34 amNowhere is this even inferred. Its notable that there has been no complaint or suggestion of any such allegation. This the AFL taking a moral stance, and at most, sacking people for breach of workplace relations.King-Eliagh wrote: Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:17 pmSo without further ado I think as a forum of members we can all comfortably say the two AFL staffers are guilty of abusing their status in the organisation for sexual gains. Disgraceful stuff really.
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
not even you could believe the shit you postKing-Eliagh wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:26 pmMy suggestion is that it's highly likely there were complaints which the AFL have intentionally kept unrevealed to the public. There's s hot chance the ladies involved may have been provided with some hush money also.
Again as I suggested in my previous post, if this is not at all the case, which seems to be what wookster and co are suggesting, then we have the AFL acting in an unlawful manner pressing two 'great'exec staffers to leave their jobs
![]()
![]()
But I mean one look at the women and middle aged creepy sleazy looking men involved and we can put our money on betting that a very dodgy unethical situation has occurred![]()
Either way we must all now come together and say on this one, the AFL is fuukkked!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the NRL know about hush hush tooAFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:42 pmAFL has a history of paying hush money .
Sweep sweep
Hush hush
Oh my
HOw about trying to address the issue king of the basement dwellers ElighKing-Eliagh wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:13 pmIn other words Ol dock for brains is trying to say "move along now, nothing to see here"docker24 wrote: Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:27 amKE you suck at trolling...really.
And this is another pointless thread created by you. How many is that now?
![]()
How's about you grow a set and actually try challenge the case against the AFL here ya pathetic time wasting turd![]()
Even Ol cranky pants wook is finally beginning to post on-topic semi intelligent responses. Do try at least follow his slow feeble lead docker. Otherwise, if you have nothing, you can simply refrain from posting rather than revealing ur self as a limp lamo whinging " you got nothing waaa waa waa" style poster.
K?
Thanks bro
![]()