Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Oh I would judge success on
How much he is paid ..is he in the top $$$$ bracket.
Lol no ...not like izzy & hunt

Will he play at NRL level ..
Probably not ...
The other 2 did in AFLOL

Will he be acclaimed by coaches & media .
Lol prob not .
The other 2 were .

So yeh they were very successful in derpball

So your judging success on how much an individual earns not on results, in that case I'll concede they were a great success in driving millions of dollars of extra revenue and free advertising for the AFL and from all accounts both were fantastic in helping gain greater awareness of Australia's game in the northern markets. On these points we both agree, as for their on field endeavours both league internationals were abject failures, lacking skill, athleticism, vision and endurance this is without question.

Hypothetically if South Sydney signed Nat Fyfe tomorrow to a 5 year 10 million dollar contract would that make him an instant success or would he have to play 1 game first?

Lol you ignored the rest of what I posted .
Why ?
Lol

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol you ignored the rest of what I posted .
Why ?
Lol

Your making statements not asking questions, I've already agreed with you that off field they were tremendous successes generating millions of extra dollars and column inches for the AFL and raising the profile of the game in the northern states, and they certainly were extraordinarily well paid for their time, on this we both are in unison.

The questions I have asked you and which you have not answered, deflected if you will are as follows.

How many games does an individual need to play for you to consider they have had a successful career?
At the moment it would appear that your argument is that 1 game will suffice.

How many games would Nat Fyfe need to play in the NRL for you to consider him a success?
A simple figure will do, i.e 1 game

If South Sydney were to sign Nat Fyfe to a 5 year 10million dollar contract would you consider him to be a success without ever taking the field?
A yes or no will suffice.

If you have any questions for my good self feel free to raise them, I'm always happy to help out.

By the way have you had a chance to have a look at the thread I bumped, it's the one were you slink away?

Lol still ignoring the other two points I raised .
Run Axey run .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Oh I would judge success on
How much he is paid ..is he in the top $$$$ bracket.
Lol no ...not like izzy & hunt

Will he play at NRL level ..
Probably not ...
The other 2 did in AFLOL

Will he be acclaimed by coaches & media .
Lol prob not .
The other 2 were .

So yeh they were very successful in derpball

Lol they were picked as marketing tools and failed!
Found out to be to dumb, slow, stupid & unskilled for AFL!
Now off in the union and starring for their teams!

Face the fact is fact spazza no way you want to spin it! Hunt and Folau were duds and proved the difference between the two games

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol still ignoring the other two points I raised .
Run Axey run .

How's this sound, you answer the questions I asked first and I'll do my best to address your non existent points after that, you do have an incredibly tough time answering the simplest of questions.

Once more for the terminally ******** .
I gave my answer on what I considered a success .
You chose to ignore some of my points .
Why is that .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Once more for the terminally ******** .
I gave my answer on what I considered a success .
You chose to ignore some of my points .
Why is that .

Out line your so called points for me champ and I'll be happy to address them, but you must promise to answer my questions after that. We don't want a repeat of what happened to you last time you refused to answer simple questions.

Lol .
You expect answers yet ignore mine .

Until you play the game

Stick your questions .

As for my points
Learn to read my posts .
I have repeated the same points several times .
Not my fault you can't answer.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol .
You expect answers yet ignore mine .

Until you play the game

Stick your questions .

As for my points
Learn to read my posts .
I have repeated the same points several times .
Not my fault you can't answer.

Come on champ I asked first and your just avoiding them, and the only thing you have repeated is that you have repeated yourself. You do have a habit of repeating yourself and running around in circles slinky.

Lol .
I answered .
You just can't seem to argue against what I posted .
1 point for being unco .

The axe wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

So you have worked out the quote function

=D> =D> =D>


Now when you think of a smart reply you can post it .

See you in about a week .

Goddamn it, still the question remains what do you consider to be a successful career, 1 game 10 games is there a figure or does it depend on the position you've taken? Hypothetically how many games would Nat Fyfe have to play in the NRL for you to coincide him a success?

Here's my question again champ, in what way did you answer it in your response, you as usual gave opinion and nothing else.
How many games would he need to play for you to consider him a success?

You asked what I considered to be a successful career .
I posted what I thought .
You are entering dumbo levels of comprehension fail .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

You asked what I considered to be a successful career .
I posted what I thought .
You are entering dumbo levels of comprehension fail .

Read my question again, I asked you how many games Nat Fyfe would need to play for you to consider him to have had a successful career, it's right there big guy I even bumped the original post. So what is it 1, 10, 50 all I need is a figure and we can move on to the next question I posed.

once again for the terminally stupid .
They played at the highest level .
Amongst the highest paid .
Lauded by media coaches etc ..
To me That's successful .
When this fumble reject can get maybe 2 of the. Above we could call him moderately successful .

But I can't see it happening