Talking Footy

post_hoc wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

wow, you guys rush to lyingdaves defense all the time, amazing. At some point in time you are going to have to let him walk on his own LOL.

So I have offered my 'evidence' and all this deflecting by the fanboys just highlights how lyingdave continues to lie

Im not defending Raider - would be the last person here to - but im still waiting for your evidence, and "simple deduction" isnt proof of anything - and you havent established "pet membership numbers" AT ALL.

I made a statement, I have backed it up with with my reason, lyingdave has done none of it

Actually really surprised by your comment wookie. I looked at dogs average crowds from last year for non Sydney based teams, which would indicate the rough ticketed member numbers, as they are there week in week out, without the away team adding to the numbers. This hovered around the 13-14k mark. This is similar to the numbers of eels fans at parramatta. Rather simple to deduce that 28k is made up by memberships of each club. Now it might not be exactly 50% but wouldn't be far off.

Now where is the question on lyingdaves 7k?

:_<>

The proof u wanker
Not some dick pulling summation

A gutless lying flea
Thats wot u are .. :_<>

post_hoc wrote:

And lyingdave is exempt from providing evidence? I gave reasoning and stop bullshitting about the pet membership I backed it up with an article from the newspaper, just because you don't like the data doesn't mean it wasn't published.

Now where are your demands for lyingdaves evidence or bring a hypocrite is ok for you? Lol

When did you back it up with an article .
I certainly haven't seen it .
& I don't think Wookie has either .
He is still asking for proof .

Post it again
I'll concede I was wrong & apologise if it says that there are 8 k pet memberships for Parra .
That is what you claimed

Porky porky porky .
You just keep digging a bigger hole for yourself .
Telling a lie to cover another lie just compounds the problem .

Be a good chap & admit you posted crap

Wow, fucking amazing. Lyingdave can claim the sky is green and everyone just ignores it. I say that the difference between proper season ticket holders and the numbers posted ie the 8000 are not members they are not season ticket holders they are jokes.

The 14,000 are season ticket holders that is the estimates I used.

Now I have explained this fucking countless times. Now lyingdave where are your facts.

post_hoc wrote:

Wow, fucking amazing. Lyingdave can claim the sky is green and everyone just ignores it. I say that the difference between proper season ticket holders and the numbers posted ie the 8000 are not members they are not season ticket holders they are jokes.

The 14,000 are season ticket holders that is the estimates I used.

Now I have explained this fucking countless times. Now lyingdave where are your facts.

You can explain it any fucking way you want .
It doesn't change the fact that you said they were PET memberships .
Which they are not .
You fucking lied
Got caught
Deal with it capo.

They are joke memberships ie pet memberships, it is a fucking the same thing.

Now that gas been said countless times, quit protecting your little fan boy.

Lyingdave where are your facts you said 7000 parra fans back it up.

Your mates have tried to deflect away from you but you can't run forever lyingdave

Beep beep .
Now comes the back pedal .
This means that .
I explained this .
This means the same thing .
BLAH blah .

Beep beep .
Back her up
Beep beep .

How many times do I have to fucking say this the pet membership is not a literal comment, ie not a fucking category, I have said that from the fucking start. I have repeated that a number of times.

The term pet membership is a derogatory comment that is used for anything other than full season memberships. I have said that fucking time and time again. You don't like the term I dont fucking care but I have said the same thing from the start. Unlike others I back up what I have said. I have backed it up all the time.

Now lyingdave let's see some fucking evidence

The_Wookie wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

They are joke memberships ie pet memberships, it is a fucking the same thing.

Bullshit. You dont know if they count 5 and 3 game members from out of state or not. You simply have no idea.

Now that gas been said countless times, quit protecting your little fan boy.

Im not a fan of raider, and im not a fan of you, but you started this particular round of shit with no evidence.

Wrong evidence posted, expalined, explained again and fucking explained countless times.

In that time lyingdave zero? So I ask again why no comment on lyingdave? Or is he a fucking protected species

The article that has been posted a few times that showed the number of season passes for the western Sydney based NRL clubs isn't evidence?

So i ask again why doesn't lyingdave have to post evidence? Is he a special pet, you know, not all there so he has to get some dispensation. If that's the case just say it, I'll quit wasting my time asking for evidence, clearly he has trouble knowing what it is.

So I can't reference what other people have posted, I need to repost exactly what has been posted? Seems rather stupid.

I noticed you dodged the question on lyingdave, is he a pet project that has special allowances becuase he has some sort of special needs

The_Wookie wrote:

You need to provide proof, before you can carry on about other peoples assumptions. You arent any better than Raider whatever you might think of yourself. You and he are the same, except he swears more.

Lol

funny guy!

cos789 wrote:

funny guy!

Not in your class .
At least he tries to explain his claims .
You don't .

So are we going back to requiring proof of statements or not.
Verification requirements seem very haphazard atm.