Page 4 of 12
Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:22 pm
by sydneyfc
eelofwest wrote:sydneyfc wrote:oi fellas
so opening friday night of the season
against your biggest rivals
tickets on sale for months
and still couldn't crack 19k
where you at pawwa? the derby was played there only a week ago and got more people than

Actually the biggest rivals for Parra are West tigers which gets over 50k at ANZ.
And Canterbury bulldogs which gets regular crowds of 30k at ANZ.
So yeah you are wrong once more...

:_<> :_<>
Eels took a game upto NT every year which gets about 10k
Eels ave 18.7k
WSW ave 15k
Sydney FC i would be worried about your club, it is already irrelevant compared to the Wanderers. What are you and your FC mates going to do to arrest this momentum the WSW have over you.
WSW 1m+ profit last year and 700k the year before.
Sydney fc -1.5m loss and 3million the year before.
What are you going to do Sydney FC.....

:_<> :_<>
im gonna err...sit here while we're closing in on 1st on the ladder whilst nearly hitting a 19k avg crowd for the season(3rd highest of any code in this entire state) and enjoy reading forecasts of profitability for next season, probably another membership record too.....so yeah....

Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:27 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Parramatta will beat all 4 nsw based sokka teams in averages this season.
Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:33 pm
by sydneyfc
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Parramatta will beat all 4 nsw based sokka teams in averages this season.
we've got 7 months of boofheadball to go but it will be interesting

Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:50 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Not even a contest.
Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:56 pm
by NlolRL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:The_Wookie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.
No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.
Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.
They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.
:>::
not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL
Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:16 pm
by Raiderdave
NlolRL wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:The_Wookie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.
No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.
Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.
They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.
:>::
not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL

:_<>
U are now challenging forrest as this sites biggest wanker
Swines
70k people in Sydney wholl watch them on TV
Parramatta
250K
Bulldogs
250K
Dragons
200k
Souths
200K
Tigers
175K
Manly
150K
Roosters
150K
Penrith
125K
Sharks
125K
so
Is that 1/5 you dribbling ****** :_<>

Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:21 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol
The vicderpian education system is a complete failure .
Look at this brain
Look at dumbo.
Lol
Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:27 pm
by Raiderdave
Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:The_Wookie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.
No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.
Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.
They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.
:>::
not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL

:_<>
U are now challenging forrest as this sites biggest wanker
Swines
70k people in Sydney wholl watch them on TV
Parramatta
250K
Bulldogs
250K
Dragons
200k
Souths
200K
Tigers
175K
Manly
150K
Roosters
150K
Penrith
125K
Sharks
125K
Now add any 2 together for a tv audience with some neutrals added in.
so
Is that 1/5 you dribbling ****** :_<>

Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:30 pm
by Raiderdave
Yeah
1/15 is a closer figure
The Raiders would have more Sydneysiders willing to watch them then the Swines

:_<>

Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:57 pm
by NlolRL
Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:The_Wookie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.
No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.
Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.
They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.
:>::
not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL

:_<>
U are now challenging forrest as this sites biggest wanker
Swines
70k people in Sydney wholl watch them on TV
Parramatta
250K
Bulldogs
250K
Dragons
200k
Souths
200K
Tigers
175K
Manly
150K
Roosters
150K
Penrith
125K
Sharks
125K
so
Is that 1/5 you dribbling ****** :_<>

comprehension fail :_<>
Swans last year rated around 50-80k FTA and 20-30k foxtel in Sydney. Most NRL games rated 330-400k in Sydney.
Therefore on average the Swans were 1/4 to 1/5th the NRL's ratings. Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider chose the Swans on TV over the NRL
Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:31 pm
by Raiderdave
NlolRL wrote:Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:The_Wookie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.
No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.
Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.
They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.
:>::
not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL

:_<>
U are now challenging forrest as this sites biggest wanker
Swines
70k people in Sydney wholl watch them on TV
Parramatta
250K
Bulldogs
250K
Dragons
200k
Souths
200K
Tigers
175K
Manly
150K
Roosters
150K
Penrith
125K
Sharks
125K
so
Is that 1/5 you dribbling ****** :_<>

comprehension fail :_<>
Swans last year rated around 50-80k FTA and 20-30k foxtel in Sydney. Most NRL games rated 330-400k in Sydney.
Therefore on average the Swans were 1/4 to 1/5th the NRL's ratings. Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider chose the Swans on TV over the NRL
the comprehension fail is yours you reta.rded halfwit
you are attempting to say that theres 1 shirt lifting swines fan to every 5 NRL fans in Sydney
that is
well
ridiculous

:_<> :_<>
there are 9 NRL teams in Sydney
& 1 fumblederps team..
heres a simple example for you to follow
I know yr a vic..ta..rd ...so naturally as dumb as pigshit & a fumbler too

... so do yr best
Parra V Bulldogs
500K in Sydney on TV
Roosters V Souths
450K in Sydney on TV
SWines V Collinscat
70K on TV in Sydney
that's
950K .. to 70K
there are thought to be a 1 to 1.2 Million NRL ... " fans " in Sydney
define a fan anyway you want
the bumblederps might have 100K
sooker about the same
yawnion .. the same
& the lesson concludes

Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:39 pm
by NlolRL
Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:The_Wookie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.
No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.
Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.
They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.
:>::
not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL

:_<>
U are now challenging forrest as this sites biggest wanker
Swines
70k people in Sydney wholl watch them on TV
Parramatta
250K
Bulldogs
250K
Dragons
200k
Souths
200K
Tigers
175K
Manly
150K
Roosters
150K
Penrith
125K
Sharks
125K
so
Is that 1/5 you dribbling ****** :_<>

comprehension fail :_<>
Swans last year rated around 50-80k FTA and 20-30k foxtel in Sydney. Most NRL games rated 330-400k in Sydney.
Therefore on average the Swans were 1/4 to 1/5th the NRL's ratings. Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider chose the Swans on TV over the NRL
the comprehension fail is yours you reta.rded halfwit
you are attempting to say that theres 1 shirt lifting swines fan to every 5 NRL fans in Sydney
well no I'm not actually. Read my comment s l o w l y
"Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider choses the Swans
on TV over the NRL"
So, if the swans are playing on a FN against the NRL, for every 5 people watching 1 is choosing to watch the AFL over the NRL. It has nothing to do with the total number of fans in the city you idiot!
Get it yet, or do you want an even simpler explanation???
![With Stupid :[]](./images/smilies/th_iwstupid.gif)
Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:07 pm
by Raiderdave
NlolRL wrote:Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:The_Wookie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.
No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.
Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.
They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.
:>::
not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL

:_<>
U are now challenging forrest as this sites biggest wanker
Swines
70k people in Sydney wholl watch them on TV
Parramatta
250K
Bulldogs
250K
Dragons
200k
Souths
200K
Tigers
175K
Manly
150K
Roosters
150K
Penrith
125K
Sharks
125K
so
Is that 1/5 you dribbling ****** :_<>

comprehension fail :_<>
Swans last year rated around 50-80k FTA and 20-30k foxtel in Sydney. Most NRL games rated 330-400k in Sydney.
Therefore on average the Swans were 1/4 to 1/5th the NRL's ratings. Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider chose the Swans on TV over the NRL
the comprehension fail is yours you reta.rded halfwit
you are attempting to say that theres 1 shirt lifting swines fan to every 5 NRL fans in Sydney
well no I'm not actually. Read my comment s l o w l y
"Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider choses the Swans
on TV over the NRL"
So, if the swans are playing on a FN against the NRL, for every 5 people watching 1 is choosing to watch the AFL over the NRL. It has nothing to do with the total number of fans in the city you idiot!
Get it yet, or do you want an even simpler explanation???
![With Stupid :[]](./images/smilies/th_iwstupid.gif)

:_<>
Vicderpians
Pigshit for brains
The FN NRL game wouldnt have half of Sydneys NRL fans watching it
We have 9 sides as I said
While the fumbles n bumbles has 1 side
So nearly every bumbleball fan Sydney will be watching them
Still going with the 1/5 wanker ?

Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:24 pm
by AFLcrap1
Seriously what is in the water in Vicderpia .
Re: 18,718
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 4:34 pm
by NlolRL
Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:Raiderdave wrote:NlolRL wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:The_Wookie wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.
No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.
Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.
They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.
:>::
not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL

:_<>
U are now challenging forrest as this sites biggest wanker
Swines
70k people in Sydney wholl watch them on TV
Parramatta
250K
Bulldogs
250K
Dragons
200k
Souths
200K
Tigers
175K
Manly
150K
Roosters
150K
Penrith
125K
Sharks
125K
so
Is that 1/5 you dribbling ****** :_<>

comprehension fail :_<>
Swans last year rated around 50-80k FTA and 20-30k foxtel in Sydney. Most NRL games rated 330-400k in Sydney.
Therefore on average the Swans were 1/4 to 1/5th the NRL's ratings. Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider chose the Swans on TV over the NRL
the comprehension fail is yours you reta.rded halfwit
you are attempting to say that theres 1 shirt lifting swines fan to every 5 NRL fans in Sydney
well no I'm not actually. Read my comment s l o w l y
"Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider choses the Swans
on TV over the NRL"
So, if the swans are playing on a FN against the NRL, for every 5 people watching 1 is choosing to watch the AFL over the NRL. It has nothing to do with the total number of fans in the city you idiot!
Get it yet, or do you want an even simpler explanation???
![With Stupid :[]](./images/smilies/th_iwstupid.gif)

:_<>
Vicderpians
Pigshit for brains
The FN NRL game wouldnt have half of Sydneys NRL fans watching it
We have 9 sides as I said
While the fumbles n bumbles has 1 side
So nearly every bumbleball fan Sydney will be watching them
Still going with the 1/5 wanker ?

OMG, I just said
It has nothing to do with the total number of fans in the city you idiot!
Its a comparison of the TV audience at the time both games are on, whcih is totally reasonable given this was a discussion about TV ratings, not total fan numbers
Fuck youre stupid!!
![With Stupid :[]](./images/smilies/th_iwstupid.gif)